Cargando…

Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush

The shape and, therefore, the architecture of the plant are dependent on genetic and environmental factors such as water supply. The architecture determines the visual quality, a key criterion underlying the decision to purchase an ornamental potted plant. The aim of this study was to analyze genoty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li-Marchetti, Camille, Le Bras, Camille, Relion, Daniel, Citerne, Sylvie, Huché-Thélier, Lydie, Sakr, Soulaiman, Morel, Philippe, Crespel, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26074929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00355
_version_ 1782372965550129152
author Li-Marchetti, Camille
Le Bras, Camille
Relion, Daniel
Citerne, Sylvie
Huché-Thélier, Lydie
Sakr, Soulaiman
Morel, Philippe
Crespel, Laurent
author_facet Li-Marchetti, Camille
Le Bras, Camille
Relion, Daniel
Citerne, Sylvie
Huché-Thélier, Lydie
Sakr, Soulaiman
Morel, Philippe
Crespel, Laurent
author_sort Li-Marchetti, Camille
collection PubMed
description The shape and, therefore, the architecture of the plant are dependent on genetic and environmental factors such as water supply. The architecture determines the visual quality, a key criterion underlying the decision to purchase an ornamental potted plant. The aim of this study was to analyze genotypic responses of eight rose bush cultivars to alternation of water restriction and re-watering periods, with soil water potential of -20 and -10 kPa respectively. Responses were evaluated at the architectural level through 3D digitalization using six architectural variables and at the physiological level by measuring stomatal conductance, water content, hormones [abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, cytokinins, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid (SA)], sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose), and proline. Highly significant genotype and watering effects were revealed for all the architectural variables measured, as well as genotype × watering interaction, with three distinct genotypic architectural responses to water restriction – weak, moderate and strong – represented by Hw336, ‘Baipome’ and ‘The Fairy,’ respectively. The physiological analysis explained, at least in part, the more moderate architectural response of ‘Baipome’ compared to ‘The Fairy,’ but not that of Hw336 which is an interspecific hybrid. Such physiological responses in ‘Baipome’ could be related to: (i) the maintenance of the stimulation of budbreak and photosynthetic activity during water restriction periods due to a higher concentration in conjugated cytokinins (cCK) and to a lower concentration in SA; (ii) a better resumption of budbreak during the re-watering periods due to a lower concentration in ABA during this period. When associated with the six architectural descriptors, cCK, SA and ABA, which explained the genotypic differences in this study, could be used as selection criteria for breeding programs aimed at improving plant shape and tolerance to water restriction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4443023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44430232015-06-12 Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush Li-Marchetti, Camille Le Bras, Camille Relion, Daniel Citerne, Sylvie Huché-Thélier, Lydie Sakr, Soulaiman Morel, Philippe Crespel, Laurent Front Plant Sci Plant Science The shape and, therefore, the architecture of the plant are dependent on genetic and environmental factors such as water supply. The architecture determines the visual quality, a key criterion underlying the decision to purchase an ornamental potted plant. The aim of this study was to analyze genotypic responses of eight rose bush cultivars to alternation of water restriction and re-watering periods, with soil water potential of -20 and -10 kPa respectively. Responses were evaluated at the architectural level through 3D digitalization using six architectural variables and at the physiological level by measuring stomatal conductance, water content, hormones [abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, cytokinins, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid (SA)], sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose), and proline. Highly significant genotype and watering effects were revealed for all the architectural variables measured, as well as genotype × watering interaction, with three distinct genotypic architectural responses to water restriction – weak, moderate and strong – represented by Hw336, ‘Baipome’ and ‘The Fairy,’ respectively. The physiological analysis explained, at least in part, the more moderate architectural response of ‘Baipome’ compared to ‘The Fairy,’ but not that of Hw336 which is an interspecific hybrid. Such physiological responses in ‘Baipome’ could be related to: (i) the maintenance of the stimulation of budbreak and photosynthetic activity during water restriction periods due to a higher concentration in conjugated cytokinins (cCK) and to a lower concentration in SA; (ii) a better resumption of budbreak during the re-watering periods due to a lower concentration in ABA during this period. When associated with the six architectural descriptors, cCK, SA and ABA, which explained the genotypic differences in this study, could be used as selection criteria for breeding programs aimed at improving plant shape and tolerance to water restriction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4443023/ /pubmed/26074929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00355 Text en Copyright © 2015 Li-Marchetti, Le Bras, Relion, Citerne, Huché-Thélier, Sakr, Morel and Crespel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Li-Marchetti, Camille
Le Bras, Camille
Relion, Daniel
Citerne, Sylvie
Huché-Thélier, Lydie
Sakr, Soulaiman
Morel, Philippe
Crespel, Laurent
Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title_full Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title_fullStr Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title_full_unstemmed Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title_short Genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
title_sort genotypic differences in architectural and physiological responses to water restriction in rose bush
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26074929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00355
work_keys_str_mv AT limarchetticamille genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT lebrascamille genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT reliondaniel genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT citernesylvie genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT huchethelierlydie genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT sakrsoulaiman genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT morelphilippe genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush
AT crespellaurent genotypicdifferencesinarchitecturalandphysiologicalresponsestowaterrestrictioninrosebush