Cargando…

A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones

BACKGROUND: The incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozkan, Korhan, Türkmen, İsmail, Sahin, Adem, Yildiz, Yavuz, Erturk, Selim, Soylemez, Mehmet Salih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015637
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156220
_version_ 1782372985904037888
author Ozkan, Korhan
Türkmen, İsmail
Sahin, Adem
Yildiz, Yavuz
Erturk, Selim
Soylemez, Mehmet Salih
author_facet Ozkan, Korhan
Türkmen, İsmail
Sahin, Adem
Yildiz, Yavuz
Erturk, Selim
Soylemez, Mehmet Salih
author_sort Ozkan, Korhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures still remains controversial. Intramedullary devices such as Gamma nail or proximal femoral nail and proximal anatomic femur plates are in use for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. There are still many investigations to find the optimal implant to treat these fractures with minimum complications. For this reason, we aimed to perform a biomechanical comparison of the proximal femoral nail and the locking proximal anatomic femoral plate in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty synthetic, third generation human femur models, obtained for this purpose, were divided into two groups of 10 bones each. Femurs were provided as a standard representation of AO/Orthopedic Trauma Associationtype 31-A2 unstable fractures. Two types of implantations were inserted: the proximal femoral intramedullary nail in the first group and the locking anatomic femoral plate in the second group. Axial load was applied to the fracture models through the femoral head using a material testing machine, and the biomechanical properties of the implant types were compared. RESULT: Nail and plate models were locked distally at the same level. Axial steady load with a 5 mm/m velocity was applied through the mechanical axis of femur bone models. Axial loading in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail group was 1.78-fold greater compared to the plate group. All bones that had the plate applied were fractured in the portion containing the distal locking screw. CONCLUSION: The proximal femoral intramedullary nail provides more stability and allows for earlier weight bearing than the locking plate when used for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinicians should be cautious for early weight bearing with locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4443419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44434192015-05-26 A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones Ozkan, Korhan Türkmen, İsmail Sahin, Adem Yildiz, Yavuz Erturk, Selim Soylemez, Mehmet Salih Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: The incidence of fractures in the trochanteric area has risen with the increasing numbers of elderly people with osteoporosis. Although dynamic hip screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures, treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures still remains controversial. Intramedullary devices such as Gamma nail or proximal femoral nail and proximal anatomic femur plates are in use for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. There are still many investigations to find the optimal implant to treat these fractures with minimum complications. For this reason, we aimed to perform a biomechanical comparison of the proximal femoral nail and the locking proximal anatomic femoral plate in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty synthetic, third generation human femur models, obtained for this purpose, were divided into two groups of 10 bones each. Femurs were provided as a standard representation of AO/Orthopedic Trauma Associationtype 31-A2 unstable fractures. Two types of implantations were inserted: the proximal femoral intramedullary nail in the first group and the locking anatomic femoral plate in the second group. Axial load was applied to the fracture models through the femoral head using a material testing machine, and the biomechanical properties of the implant types were compared. RESULT: Nail and plate models were locked distally at the same level. Axial steady load with a 5 mm/m velocity was applied through the mechanical axis of femur bone models. Axial loading in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail group was 1.78-fold greater compared to the plate group. All bones that had the plate applied were fractured in the portion containing the distal locking screw. CONCLUSION: The proximal femoral intramedullary nail provides more stability and allows for earlier weight bearing than the locking plate when used for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinicians should be cautious for early weight bearing with locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4443419/ /pubmed/26015637 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156220 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozkan, Korhan
Türkmen, İsmail
Sahin, Adem
Yildiz, Yavuz
Erturk, Selim
Soylemez, Mehmet Salih
A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title_full A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title_fullStr A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title_full_unstemmed A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title_short A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones
title_sort biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: a study on synthetic bones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015637
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.156220
work_keys_str_mv AT ozkankorhan abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT turkmenismail abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT sahinadem abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT yildizyavuz abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT erturkselim abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT soylemezmehmetsalih abiomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT ozkankorhan biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT turkmenismail biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT sahinadem biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT yildizyavuz biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT erturkselim biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones
AT soylemezmehmetsalih biomechanicalcomparisonofproximalfemoralnailsandlockingproximalanatomicfemoralplatesinfemoralfracturefixationastudyonsyntheticbones