Cargando…
Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8 |
_version_ | 1782372998840320000 |
---|---|
author | Schwarz, Theresa M. Kolben, Thomas Gallwas, Julia Crispin, Alexander Dannecker, Christian |
author_facet | Schwarz, Theresa M. Kolben, Thomas Gallwas, Julia Crispin, Alexander Dannecker, Christian |
author_sort | Schwarz, Theresa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to be resected, including the transformation zone. It is well known from the literature that the cone size directly correlates with the risk of preterm delivery in the course of a future pregnancy. Thus, it would be highly desirable to keep the cone dimension as small as possible while maintaining the same level of oncological safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to analyze whether resection of the lesion only, without additional excision of the transformation zone, is equally as effective as the classical LLETZ operation regarding oncological outcome. We are performing this prospective, patient-blinded multicenter trial by randomly assigning women who need to undergo a LLETZ operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 to either of the following two groups at a ratio of 1:1: (1) additional resection of the transformation zone or (2) resection of the lesion only. To evaluate equal oncological outcome, we are performing human papillomavirus (HPV) tests 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The study is designed to consider the lesion-only operation as oncologically not inferior if the rate of HPV high-risk test results is not higher than 5 % compared with the HPV high-risk rate of women undergoing the classical LLETZ operation. DISCUSSION: In case that non-inferiority of the “lesion-only” method can be demonstrated, this operation should eventually become standard treatment for all women at childbearing age due to the reduction in risk of preterm delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) Identifier: DRKS00006169. Date of registration: 30 July 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4443515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44435152015-05-27 Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Schwarz, Theresa M. Kolben, Thomas Gallwas, Julia Crispin, Alexander Dannecker, Christian Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to be resected, including the transformation zone. It is well known from the literature that the cone size directly correlates with the risk of preterm delivery in the course of a future pregnancy. Thus, it would be highly desirable to keep the cone dimension as small as possible while maintaining the same level of oncological safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to analyze whether resection of the lesion only, without additional excision of the transformation zone, is equally as effective as the classical LLETZ operation regarding oncological outcome. We are performing this prospective, patient-blinded multicenter trial by randomly assigning women who need to undergo a LLETZ operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 to either of the following two groups at a ratio of 1:1: (1) additional resection of the transformation zone or (2) resection of the lesion only. To evaluate equal oncological outcome, we are performing human papillomavirus (HPV) tests 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The study is designed to consider the lesion-only operation as oncologically not inferior if the rate of HPV high-risk test results is not higher than 5 % compared with the HPV high-risk rate of women undergoing the classical LLETZ operation. DISCUSSION: In case that non-inferiority of the “lesion-only” method can be demonstrated, this operation should eventually become standard treatment for all women at childbearing age due to the reduction in risk of preterm delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) Identifier: DRKS00006169. Date of registration: 30 July 2014. BioMed Central 2015-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4443515/ /pubmed/26002493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8 Text en © Schwarz et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Schwarz, Theresa M. Kolben, Thomas Gallwas, Julia Crispin, Alexander Dannecker, Christian Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of cin: classical lletz (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarztheresam comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kolbenthomas comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gallwasjulia comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT crispinalexander comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT danneckerchristian comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |