Cargando…

Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarz, Theresa M., Kolben, Thomas, Gallwas, Julia, Crispin, Alexander, Dannecker, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8
_version_ 1782372998840320000
author Schwarz, Theresa M.
Kolben, Thomas
Gallwas, Julia
Crispin, Alexander
Dannecker, Christian
author_facet Schwarz, Theresa M.
Kolben, Thomas
Gallwas, Julia
Crispin, Alexander
Dannecker, Christian
author_sort Schwarz, Theresa M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to be resected, including the transformation zone. It is well known from the literature that the cone size directly correlates with the risk of preterm delivery in the course of a future pregnancy. Thus, it would be highly desirable to keep the cone dimension as small as possible while maintaining the same level of oncological safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to analyze whether resection of the lesion only, without additional excision of the transformation zone, is equally as effective as the classical LLETZ operation regarding oncological outcome. We are performing this prospective, patient-blinded multicenter trial by randomly assigning women who need to undergo a LLETZ operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 to either of the following two groups at a ratio of 1:1: (1) additional resection of the transformation zone or (2) resection of the lesion only. To evaluate equal oncological outcome, we are performing human papillomavirus (HPV) tests 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The study is designed to consider the lesion-only operation as oncologically not inferior if the rate of HPV high-risk test results is not higher than 5 % compared with the HPV high-risk rate of women undergoing the classical LLETZ operation. DISCUSSION: In case that non-inferiority of the “lesion-only” method can be demonstrated, this operation should eventually become standard treatment for all women at childbearing age due to the reduction in risk of preterm delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) Identifier: DRKS00006169. Date of registration: 30 July 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4443515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44435152015-05-27 Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Schwarz, Theresa M. Kolben, Thomas Gallwas, Julia Crispin, Alexander Dannecker, Christian Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to be resected, including the transformation zone. It is well known from the literature that the cone size directly correlates with the risk of preterm delivery in the course of a future pregnancy. Thus, it would be highly desirable to keep the cone dimension as small as possible while maintaining the same level of oncological safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this study is to analyze whether resection of the lesion only, without additional excision of the transformation zone, is equally as effective as the classical LLETZ operation regarding oncological outcome. We are performing this prospective, patient-blinded multicenter trial by randomly assigning women who need to undergo a LLETZ operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 to either of the following two groups at a ratio of 1:1: (1) additional resection of the transformation zone or (2) resection of the lesion only. To evaluate equal oncological outcome, we are performing human papillomavirus (HPV) tests 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The study is designed to consider the lesion-only operation as oncologically not inferior if the rate of HPV high-risk test results is not higher than 5 % compared with the HPV high-risk rate of women undergoing the classical LLETZ operation. DISCUSSION: In case that non-inferiority of the “lesion-only” method can be demonstrated, this operation should eventually become standard treatment for all women at childbearing age due to the reduction in risk of preterm delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) Identifier: DRKS00006169. Date of registration: 30 July 2014. BioMed Central 2015-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4443515/ /pubmed/26002493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8 Text en © Schwarz et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schwarz, Theresa M.
Kolben, Thomas
Gallwas, Julia
Crispin, Alexander
Dannecker, Christian
Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of cin: classical lletz (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26002493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarztheresam comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kolbenthomas comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gallwasjulia comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crispinalexander comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danneckerchristian comparisonoftwosurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofcinclassicallletzlargeloopexcisionofthetransformationzoneversusisolatedresectionofthecolposcopicapparentlesionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial