Cargando…

Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants

ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ming-Yue, Zhu, Tao, Li, Xue-Nan, Lan, Xin-Ran, Liu, Heng-Yuan, Yang, Yu-Fei, Niu, Deng-Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7
Descripción
Sumario:ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Jun Yu and Zhang Zhang. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.