Cargando…

Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants

ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ming-Yue, Zhu, Tao, Li, Xue-Nan, Lan, Xin-Ran, Liu, Heng-Yuan, Yang, Yu-Fei, Niu, Deng-Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7
_version_ 1782373003041964032
author Ma, Ming-Yue
Zhu, Tao
Li, Xue-Nan
Lan, Xin-Ran
Liu, Heng-Yuan
Yang, Yu-Fei
Niu, Deng-Ke
author_facet Ma, Ming-Yue
Zhu, Tao
Li, Xue-Nan
Lan, Xin-Ran
Liu, Heng-Yuan
Yang, Yu-Fei
Niu, Deng-Ke
author_sort Ma, Ming-Yue
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Jun Yu and Zhang Zhang. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4443532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44435322015-05-27 Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants Ma, Ming-Yue Zhu, Tao Li, Xue-Nan Lan, Xin-Ran Liu, Heng-Yuan Yang, Yu-Fei Niu, Deng-Ke Biol Direct Discovery Notes ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Jun Yu and Zhang Zhang. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4443532/ /pubmed/27392031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7 Text en © Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Discovery Notes
Ma, Ming-Yue
Zhu, Tao
Li, Xue-Nan
Lan, Xin-Ran
Liu, Heng-Yuan
Yang, Yu-Fei
Niu, Deng-Ke
Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title_full Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title_fullStr Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title_full_unstemmed Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title_short Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
title_sort imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
topic Discovery Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mamingyue impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT zhutao impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT lixuenan impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT lanxinran impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT liuhengyuan impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT yangyufei impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants
AT niudengke impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants