Cargando…
Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7 |
_version_ | 1782373003041964032 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Ming-Yue Zhu, Tao Li, Xue-Nan Lan, Xin-Ran Liu, Heng-Yuan Yang, Yu-Fei Niu, Deng-Ke |
author_facet | Ma, Ming-Yue Zhu, Tao Li, Xue-Nan Lan, Xin-Ran Liu, Heng-Yuan Yang, Yu-Fei Niu, Deng-Ke |
author_sort | Ma, Ming-Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Jun Yu and Zhang Zhang. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4443532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44435322015-05-27 Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants Ma, Ming-Yue Zhu, Tao Li, Xue-Nan Lan, Xin-Ran Liu, Heng-Yuan Yang, Yu-Fei Niu, Deng-Ke Biol Direct Discovery Notes ABSTRACT: In this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Jun Yu and Zhang Zhang. For complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4443532/ /pubmed/27392031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7 Text en © Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Discovery Notes Ma, Ming-Yue Zhu, Tao Li, Xue-Nan Lan, Xin-Ran Liu, Heng-Yuan Yang, Yu-Fei Niu, Deng-Ke Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title | Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title_full | Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title_fullStr | Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title_full_unstemmed | Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title_short | Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
title_sort | imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants |
topic | Discovery Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0056-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mamingyue impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT zhutao impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT lixuenan impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT lanxinran impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT liuhengyuan impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT yangyufei impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants AT niudengke impreciseintronlossesarelessfrequentthanpreciseintronlossesbutarenotrareinplants |