Cargando…

Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse

Leadership is commonly invoked when accounting for the coordination of group movements in animals, yet it remains loosely defined. In parallel, there is increased evidence of the sharing of group decisions by animals on the move. How leadership integrates within this recent framework on collective d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourjade, Marie, Thierry, Bernard, Hausberger, Martine, Petit, Odile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26010442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126344
_version_ 1782373099715428352
author Bourjade, Marie
Thierry, Bernard
Hausberger, Martine
Petit, Odile
author_facet Bourjade, Marie
Thierry, Bernard
Hausberger, Martine
Petit, Odile
author_sort Bourjade, Marie
collection PubMed
description Leadership is commonly invoked when accounting for the coordination of group movements in animals, yet it remains loosely defined. In parallel, there is increased evidence of the sharing of group decisions by animals on the move. How leadership integrates within this recent framework on collective decision-making is unclear. Here, we question the occurrence of leadership in horses, a species in which this concept is of prevalent use. The relevance of the three main definitions of leadership – departing first, walking in front travel position, and eliciting the joining of mates – was tested on the collective movements of two semi-free ranging groups of Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii). We did not find any leader capable of driving most group movements or recruiting mates more quickly than others. Several group members often displayed pre-departure behaviours at the same time, and the simultaneous departure of several individuals was common. We conclude that the decision-making process was shared by several group members a group movement (i.e., partially shared consensus) and that the leadership concept did not help to depict individual departure and leading behaviour across movements in both study groups. Rather, the different proxies of leadership produced conflicting information about individual contributions to group coordination. This study discusses the implications of these findings for the field of coordination and decision-making research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4444174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44441742015-06-16 Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse Bourjade, Marie Thierry, Bernard Hausberger, Martine Petit, Odile PLoS One Research Article Leadership is commonly invoked when accounting for the coordination of group movements in animals, yet it remains loosely defined. In parallel, there is increased evidence of the sharing of group decisions by animals on the move. How leadership integrates within this recent framework on collective decision-making is unclear. Here, we question the occurrence of leadership in horses, a species in which this concept is of prevalent use. The relevance of the three main definitions of leadership – departing first, walking in front travel position, and eliciting the joining of mates – was tested on the collective movements of two semi-free ranging groups of Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii). We did not find any leader capable of driving most group movements or recruiting mates more quickly than others. Several group members often displayed pre-departure behaviours at the same time, and the simultaneous departure of several individuals was common. We conclude that the decision-making process was shared by several group members a group movement (i.e., partially shared consensus) and that the leadership concept did not help to depict individual departure and leading behaviour across movements in both study groups. Rather, the different proxies of leadership produced conflicting information about individual contributions to group coordination. This study discusses the implications of these findings for the field of coordination and decision-making research. Public Library of Science 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4444174/ /pubmed/26010442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126344 Text en © 2015 Bourjade et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bourjade, Marie
Thierry, Bernard
Hausberger, Martine
Petit, Odile
Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title_full Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title_fullStr Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title_full_unstemmed Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title_short Is Leadership a Reliable Concept in Animals? An Empirical Study in the Horse
title_sort is leadership a reliable concept in animals? an empirical study in the horse
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26010442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126344
work_keys_str_mv AT bourjademarie isleadershipareliableconceptinanimalsanempiricalstudyinthehorse
AT thierrybernard isleadershipareliableconceptinanimalsanempiricalstudyinthehorse
AT hausbergermartine isleadershipareliableconceptinanimalsanempiricalstudyinthehorse
AT petitodile isleadershipareliableconceptinanimalsanempiricalstudyinthehorse