Cargando…

Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kill, Clemens, Galbas, Monika, Neuhaus, Christian, Hahn, Oliver, Wallot, Pascal, Kesper, Karl, Wulf, Hinnerk, Dersch, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26011525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127759
_version_ 1782373105332649984
author Kill, Clemens
Galbas, Monika
Neuhaus, Christian
Hahn, Oliver
Wallot, Pascal
Kesper, Karl
Wulf, Hinnerk
Dersch, Wolfgang
author_facet Kill, Clemens
Galbas, Monika
Neuhaus, Christian
Hahn, Oliver
Wallot, Pascal
Kesper, Karl
Wulf, Hinnerk
Dersch, Wolfgang
author_sort Kill, Clemens
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pig model. METHODS: In 12 pigs (general anaesthesia/intubation) ventricular fibrillation was induced and continuous chest compressions were started after 3min. Pigs were mechanically ventilated in a cross-over setting with 5 ventilation periods of 4min each: Ventilation modes were during the first and last period IPPV (100% O(2), tidalvolumes = 7ml/kgKG, respiratoryrate = 10/min), during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th period CCSV (100% O(2)), a pressure-controlled and with each chest compression synchronized breathing pattern with three different presets in randomized order. Presets: CCSV(A): P(insp) = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 205ms; CCSV(B): P(insp) = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms; CCSV(C): P(insp) = 45mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms. Blood gas samples were drawn for each period, mean arterial (MAP) and centralvenous (CVP) blood pressures were continuously recorded. Results as median (25%/75%percentiles). RESULTS: Ventilation with each CCSV mode resulted in higher PaO(2) than IPPV: PaO(2): IPPV(first): 19.6(13.9/36.2)kPa, IPPV(last): 22.7(5.4/36.9)kPa (p = 0.77 vs IPPV(first)), CCSV(A): 48.9(29.0/58.2)kPa (p = 0.028 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)), CCSV(B): 54.0 (43.8/64.1) (p = 0.001 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)), CCSV(C): 46.0 (20.2/58.4) (p = 0.006 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)). Both the MAP and the difference MAP-CVP did not decrease during twelve minutes CPR with all three presets of CCSV and were higher than the pressures of the last IPPV period. CONCLUSIONS: All patterns of CCSV lead to a higher PaO(2) and avoid an arterial blood pressure drop during resuscitation compared to IPPV in this pig model of cardiac arrest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4444197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44441972015-06-16 Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model Kill, Clemens Galbas, Monika Neuhaus, Christian Hahn, Oliver Wallot, Pascal Kesper, Karl Wulf, Hinnerk Dersch, Wolfgang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend mechanical ventilation with Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) during resuscitation. The influence of the novel ventilator mode Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation (CCSV) on gas exchange and arterial blood pressure compared with IPPV was investigated in a pig model. METHODS: In 12 pigs (general anaesthesia/intubation) ventricular fibrillation was induced and continuous chest compressions were started after 3min. Pigs were mechanically ventilated in a cross-over setting with 5 ventilation periods of 4min each: Ventilation modes were during the first and last period IPPV (100% O(2), tidalvolumes = 7ml/kgKG, respiratoryrate = 10/min), during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th period CCSV (100% O(2)), a pressure-controlled and with each chest compression synchronized breathing pattern with three different presets in randomized order. Presets: CCSV(A): P(insp) = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 205ms; CCSV(B): P(insp) = 60mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms; CCSV(C): P(insp) = 45mbar, inspiratorytime = 265ms. Blood gas samples were drawn for each period, mean arterial (MAP) and centralvenous (CVP) blood pressures were continuously recorded. Results as median (25%/75%percentiles). RESULTS: Ventilation with each CCSV mode resulted in higher PaO(2) than IPPV: PaO(2): IPPV(first): 19.6(13.9/36.2)kPa, IPPV(last): 22.7(5.4/36.9)kPa (p = 0.77 vs IPPV(first)), CCSV(A): 48.9(29.0/58.2)kPa (p = 0.028 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)), CCSV(B): 54.0 (43.8/64.1) (p = 0.001 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)), CCSV(C): 46.0 (20.2/58.4) (p = 0.006 vs IPPV(first), p = 0.0001 vs IPPV(last)). Both the MAP and the difference MAP-CVP did not decrease during twelve minutes CPR with all three presets of CCSV and were higher than the pressures of the last IPPV period. CONCLUSIONS: All patterns of CCSV lead to a higher PaO(2) and avoid an arterial blood pressure drop during resuscitation compared to IPPV in this pig model of cardiac arrest. Public Library of Science 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4444197/ /pubmed/26011525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127759 Text en © 2015 Kill et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kill, Clemens
Galbas, Monika
Neuhaus, Christian
Hahn, Oliver
Wallot, Pascal
Kesper, Karl
Wulf, Hinnerk
Dersch, Wolfgang
Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title_full Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title_fullStr Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title_short Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model
title_sort chest compression synchronized ventilation versus intermitted positive pressure ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pig model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26011525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127759
work_keys_str_mv AT killclemens chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT galbasmonika chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT neuhauschristian chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT hahnoliver chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT wallotpascal chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT kesperkarl chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT wulfhinnerk chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel
AT derschwolfgang chestcompressionsynchronizedventilationversusintermittedpositivepressureventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationinapigmodel