Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy after Regional Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia - A Retrospective Study Using Two Independent Databases

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is effective in reducing stroke risk in selected patient groups. The ideal anesthetic technique remains controversial in light of literature between general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) for CEA. METHODS: We studied the NSQIP data from 2005 to 2012. There were 32,718 patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) and 5,384 patients receiving regional anesthesia, local anesthesia, or monitored anesthesia care (RA). The outcome measurements of 30 days postoperative complications were death, stroke, coma, unplanned intubation, on ventilator > 48 hours, cardiac arrest, and myocardial infarction. We next studied NY-SID data from 2007 to 2011. There were 13,913 patients receiving GA and 3,145 patients receiving RA. The outcome measurements by discharge time were death, stroke, paraplegia, new neurological disorder, aspiration, respiratory failure, pulmonary resuscitation procedure (include intubation), cardiac arrest, cardiac resuscitation procedure, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure. All analyses were risk adjusted with propensity score matching algorithm. RESULTS: There were significant differences in incidences of un-expected intubation (1.21% vs. 0.55%, P=0.001), and myocardial infarction (0.80% vs. 0.35%, P=0.039) between GA and RA respectively in NSQIP data. GA group had significant higher incidences of aspiration (0.61% vs. 0.19%, P=0.014), and pulmonary resuscitation procedure (including intubation) (1.02% vs. 0.54%, P=0.044) than RA group in NY-SID data. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to GA, patients receiving RA had significant lower risks of postoperative unplanned intubation and/or pulmonary resuscitation procedure after carotid endarterectomy.