Cargando…
Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin plus bail-out glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has been shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin plus routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing cardiac ischemic events, but with a lower bleeding risk. It is unknown whether bi...
Autores principales: | Bavry, Anthony A., Elgendy, Islam Y., Mahmoud, Ahmed, Jadhav, Manoj P., Huo, Tianyao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26010682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127832 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
por: Patel, Hiten, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Safety of Routine Invasive Versus Selective Invasive Therapy in Women with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
por: Bavry, Anthony A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Lehman, Sam J, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Heparin Versus Bivalirudin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unfractionated Heparin Monotherapy Elevated to Primary Treatment in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Centurión, Osmar Antonio
Publicado: (2016) -
Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin: a meta-analysis of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes
por: Farag, Mohamed, et al.
Publicado: (2015)