Cargando…

Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT

This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Yeong Yi, Kim, Sung Hun, Kang, Bong Joo, Lee, Ah Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028936
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.808
_version_ 1782373156630036480
author An, Yeong Yi
Kim, Sung Hun
Kang, Bong Joo
Lee, Ah Won
author_facet An, Yeong Yi
Kim, Sung Hun
Kang, Bong Joo
Lee, Ah Won
author_sort An, Yeong Yi
collection PubMed
description This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In 20 patients with breast cancer, DCE-MRI and DWI using a 3 T scanner and PET/CT were performed before and after NAC. DCE-MRI was analyzed using an automatic computer-aided detection program (MR-CAD). The response imaging parameters were compared with the pathologic response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for DCE-MRI using MR-CAD analysis, DWI and PET/CT were 0.77, 0.59 and 0.76, respectively. The combination of all parameters measured by MR-CAD showed the highest diagnostic performance and accuracy (AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 90%). The combined use of the parameters of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI showed a trend toward improved specificity and negative predictive value (100%, 100%, accuracy = 87.5%). The use of DCE-MRI using MR-CAD parameters indicated better diagnostic performance in predicting the final pathological response compared with DWI and PET/CT, although no statistically significant difference was observed. The combined use of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI may improve the specificity for predicting a pathological response. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4444484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44444842015-06-01 Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT An, Yeong Yi Kim, Sung Hun Kang, Bong Joo Lee, Ah Won J Korean Med Sci Original Article This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In 20 patients with breast cancer, DCE-MRI and DWI using a 3 T scanner and PET/CT were performed before and after NAC. DCE-MRI was analyzed using an automatic computer-aided detection program (MR-CAD). The response imaging parameters were compared with the pathologic response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for DCE-MRI using MR-CAD analysis, DWI and PET/CT were 0.77, 0.59 and 0.76, respectively. The combination of all parameters measured by MR-CAD showed the highest diagnostic performance and accuracy (AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 90%). The combined use of the parameters of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI showed a trend toward improved specificity and negative predictive value (100%, 100%, accuracy = 87.5%). The use of DCE-MRI using MR-CAD parameters indicated better diagnostic performance in predicting the final pathological response compared with DWI and PET/CT, although no statistically significant difference was observed. The combined use of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI may improve the specificity for predicting a pathological response. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2015-06 2015-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4444484/ /pubmed/26028936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.808 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
An, Yeong Yi
Kim, Sung Hun
Kang, Bong Joo
Lee, Ah Won
Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title_full Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title_fullStr Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title_short Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT
title_sort treatment response evaluation of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and usefulness of the imaging parameters of mri and pet/ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028936
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.808
work_keys_str_mv AT anyeongyi treatmentresponseevaluationofbreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyandusefulnessoftheimagingparametersofmriandpetct
AT kimsunghun treatmentresponseevaluationofbreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyandusefulnessoftheimagingparametersofmriandpetct
AT kangbongjoo treatmentresponseevaluationofbreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyandusefulnessoftheimagingparametersofmriandpetct
AT leeahwon treatmentresponseevaluationofbreastcancerafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyandusefulnessoftheimagingparametersofmriandpetct