Cargando…
Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
“Classical peer review” has been subject to intense criticism for slowing down the publication process, bias against specific categories of paper and author, unreliability, inability to detect errors and fraud, unethical practices, and the lack of recognition for unpaid reviewers. This paper surveys...
Autores principales: | Walker, Richard, Rocha da Silva, Pascal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26074753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00169 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
por: Florian, Răzvan V.
Publicado: (2012) -
Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
por: Lee, Christopher
Publicado: (2012) -
Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation
por: Pöschl, Ulrich
Publicado: (2012) -
Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
por: Birukou, Aliaksandr, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
por: Sandewall, Erik
Publicado: (2012)