Cargando…

Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis

This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Chao, Wei, Jie, Li, Hui, Yang, Tuo, Gao, Shu-guang, Li, Yu-sheng, Xiong, Yi-lin, Xiao, Wen-feng, Luo, Wei, Yang, Tu-bao, Lei, Guang-hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26012738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593
_version_ 1782373226771382272
author Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Gao, Shu-guang
Li, Yu-sheng
Xiong, Yi-lin
Xiao, Wen-feng
Luo, Wei
Yang, Tu-bao
Lei, Guang-hua
author_facet Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Gao, Shu-guang
Li, Yu-sheng
Xiong, Yi-lin
Xiao, Wen-feng
Luo, Wei
Yang, Tu-bao
Lei, Guang-hua
author_sort Zeng, Chao
collection PubMed
description This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidences on treatment effectiveness and safety. A total of 24 RCTs covering 11696 patients were included. For the comparison in between the two dosage regimens, 100 mg BID oral celecoxib exhibited a greater probability to be the preferred one either in terms of pain intensity or function at the last follow-up time point. For total gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), both of the two dosage regimens demonstrated a higher incidence compared to the placebo group. Further analyses of GI AEs revealed that only 200 mg QD was associated with a significantly higher risk of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Furthermore, 100 mg BID showed a significantly lower incidence of skin AEs when compared with 200 mg QD and placebo. Maybe 100 mg BID should be considered as the preferred dosage regimen in the treatment of knee or hip OA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44450372015-06-01 Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Gao, Shu-guang Li, Yu-sheng Xiong, Yi-lin Xiao, Wen-feng Luo, Wei Yang, Tu-bao Lei, Guang-hua Sci Rep Article This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidences on treatment effectiveness and safety. A total of 24 RCTs covering 11696 patients were included. For the comparison in between the two dosage regimens, 100 mg BID oral celecoxib exhibited a greater probability to be the preferred one either in terms of pain intensity or function at the last follow-up time point. For total gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), both of the two dosage regimens demonstrated a higher incidence compared to the placebo group. Further analyses of GI AEs revealed that only 200 mg QD was associated with a significantly higher risk of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Furthermore, 100 mg BID showed a significantly lower incidence of skin AEs when compared with 200 mg QD and placebo. Maybe 100 mg BID should be considered as the preferred dosage regimen in the treatment of knee or hip OA. Nature Publishing Group 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4445037/ /pubmed/26012738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zeng, Chao
Wei, Jie
Li, Hui
Yang, Tuo
Gao, Shu-guang
Li, Yu-sheng
Xiong, Yi-lin
Xiao, Wen-feng
Luo, Wei
Yang, Tu-bao
Lei, Guang-hua
Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title_full Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title_short Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
title_sort comparison between 200 mg qd and 100 mg bid oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26012738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593
work_keys_str_mv AT zengchao comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT weijie comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT lihui comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT yangtuo comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT gaoshuguang comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT liyusheng comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT xiongyilin comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT xiaowenfeng comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT luowei comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT yangtubao comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis
AT leiguanghua comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis