Cargando…
Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis
This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26012738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593 |
_version_ | 1782373226771382272 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Gao, Shu-guang Li, Yu-sheng Xiong, Yi-lin Xiao, Wen-feng Luo, Wei Yang, Tu-bao Lei, Guang-hua |
author_facet | Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Gao, Shu-guang Li, Yu-sheng Xiong, Yi-lin Xiao, Wen-feng Luo, Wei Yang, Tu-bao Lei, Guang-hua |
author_sort | Zeng, Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidences on treatment effectiveness and safety. A total of 24 RCTs covering 11696 patients were included. For the comparison in between the two dosage regimens, 100 mg BID oral celecoxib exhibited a greater probability to be the preferred one either in terms of pain intensity or function at the last follow-up time point. For total gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), both of the two dosage regimens demonstrated a higher incidence compared to the placebo group. Further analyses of GI AEs revealed that only 200 mg QD was associated with a significantly higher risk of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Furthermore, 100 mg BID showed a significantly lower incidence of skin AEs when compared with 200 mg QD and placebo. Maybe 100 mg BID should be considered as the preferred dosage regimen in the treatment of knee or hip OA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4445037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44450372015-06-01 Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Gao, Shu-guang Li, Yu-sheng Xiong, Yi-lin Xiao, Wen-feng Luo, Wei Yang, Tu-bao Lei, Guang-hua Sci Rep Article This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidences on treatment effectiveness and safety. A total of 24 RCTs covering 11696 patients were included. For the comparison in between the two dosage regimens, 100 mg BID oral celecoxib exhibited a greater probability to be the preferred one either in terms of pain intensity or function at the last follow-up time point. For total gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), both of the two dosage regimens demonstrated a higher incidence compared to the placebo group. Further analyses of GI AEs revealed that only 200 mg QD was associated with a significantly higher risk of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Furthermore, 100 mg BID showed a significantly lower incidence of skin AEs when compared with 200 mg QD and placebo. Maybe 100 mg BID should be considered as the preferred dosage regimen in the treatment of knee or hip OA. Nature Publishing Group 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4445037/ /pubmed/26012738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zeng, Chao Wei, Jie Li, Hui Yang, Tuo Gao, Shu-guang Li, Yu-sheng Xiong, Yi-lin Xiao, Wen-feng Luo, Wei Yang, Tu-bao Lei, Guang-hua Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title | Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title_full | Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title_fullStr | Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title_short | Comparison between 200 mg QD and 100 mg BID oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
title_sort | comparison between 200 mg qd and 100 mg bid oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee or hip osteoarthritis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26012738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengchao comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT weijie comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT lihui comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT yangtuo comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT gaoshuguang comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT liyusheng comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT xiongyilin comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT xiaowenfeng comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT luowei comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT yangtubao comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis AT leiguanghua comparisonbetween200mgqdand100mgbidoralcelecoxibinthetreatmentofkneeorhiposteoarthritis |