Cargando…

Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The anaesthetic challenge of awake craniotomy is to maintain adequate sedation, analgesia, respiratory and haemodynamic stability in an awake patient who should be able to co-operate during intraoperative neurological assessment. The current literature, sharing the experience on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokhal, Navdeep, Rath, Girija Prasad, Chaturvedi, Arvind, Dash, Hari Hara, Bithal, Parmod Kumar, Chandra, P Sarat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019355
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.156878
_version_ 1782373237999534080
author Sokhal, Navdeep
Rath, Girija Prasad
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Dash, Hari Hara
Bithal, Parmod Kumar
Chandra, P Sarat
author_facet Sokhal, Navdeep
Rath, Girija Prasad
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Dash, Hari Hara
Bithal, Parmod Kumar
Chandra, P Sarat
author_sort Sokhal, Navdeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The anaesthetic challenge of awake craniotomy is to maintain adequate sedation, analgesia, respiratory and haemodynamic stability in an awake patient who should be able to co-operate during intraoperative neurological assessment. The current literature, sharing the experience on awake craniotomy, in Indian context, is minimal. Hence, we carried out a retrospective study with the aim to review and analyse the anaesthetic management and perioperative complications in patients undergoing awake craniotomy, at our centre. METHODS: Medical records of 54 patients who underwent awake craniotomy for intracranial lesions over a period of 10 years were reviewed, retrospectively. Data regarding anaesthetic management, intraoperative complications and post-operative course were recorded. RESULTS: Propofol (81.5%) and dexmedetomidine (18.5%) were the main agents used for providing conscious sedation to facilitate awake craniotomy. Hypertension (16.7%) was the most commonly encountered complication during intraoperative period, followed by seizures (9.3%), desaturation (7.4%), tight brain (7.4%), and shivering (5.6%). The procedure had to be converted to general anaesthesia in one of patients owing to refractory brain bulge. The incidence of respiratory and haemodynamic complications were comparable in the both groups (P > 0.05). There was less incidence of intraoperative seizures in patients who received propofol (P = 0.03). In post-operative period, 20% of patients developed new motor deficit. Mean intensive care unit stay was 2.8 ± 1.9 day (1–14 days) and mean hospital stay was 7.0 ± 5.0 day (3–30 days). CONCLUSIONS: ‘Conscious sedation’ was the technique of choice for awake craniotomy, at our institute. Fentanyl, propofol, and dexmedetomidine were the main agents used for this purpose. Patients receiving propofol had less incidence of intraoperative seizure. Appropriate selection of patients, understanding the procedure of surgery, and judicious use of sedatives or anaesthetic agents are key to the success for awake craniotomy as a procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44451522015-05-27 Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases Sokhal, Navdeep Rath, Girija Prasad Chaturvedi, Arvind Dash, Hari Hara Bithal, Parmod Kumar Chandra, P Sarat Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The anaesthetic challenge of awake craniotomy is to maintain adequate sedation, analgesia, respiratory and haemodynamic stability in an awake patient who should be able to co-operate during intraoperative neurological assessment. The current literature, sharing the experience on awake craniotomy, in Indian context, is minimal. Hence, we carried out a retrospective study with the aim to review and analyse the anaesthetic management and perioperative complications in patients undergoing awake craniotomy, at our centre. METHODS: Medical records of 54 patients who underwent awake craniotomy for intracranial lesions over a period of 10 years were reviewed, retrospectively. Data regarding anaesthetic management, intraoperative complications and post-operative course were recorded. RESULTS: Propofol (81.5%) and dexmedetomidine (18.5%) were the main agents used for providing conscious sedation to facilitate awake craniotomy. Hypertension (16.7%) was the most commonly encountered complication during intraoperative period, followed by seizures (9.3%), desaturation (7.4%), tight brain (7.4%), and shivering (5.6%). The procedure had to be converted to general anaesthesia in one of patients owing to refractory brain bulge. The incidence of respiratory and haemodynamic complications were comparable in the both groups (P > 0.05). There was less incidence of intraoperative seizures in patients who received propofol (P = 0.03). In post-operative period, 20% of patients developed new motor deficit. Mean intensive care unit stay was 2.8 ± 1.9 day (1–14 days) and mean hospital stay was 7.0 ± 5.0 day (3–30 days). CONCLUSIONS: ‘Conscious sedation’ was the technique of choice for awake craniotomy, at our institute. Fentanyl, propofol, and dexmedetomidine were the main agents used for this purpose. Patients receiving propofol had less incidence of intraoperative seizure. Appropriate selection of patients, understanding the procedure of surgery, and judicious use of sedatives or anaesthetic agents are key to the success for awake craniotomy as a procedure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4445152/ /pubmed/26019355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.156878 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Sokhal, Navdeep
Rath, Girija Prasad
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Dash, Hari Hara
Bithal, Parmod Kumar
Chandra, P Sarat
Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title_full Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title_fullStr Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title_full_unstemmed Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title_short Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: A retrospective study of 54 cases
title_sort anaesthesia for awake craniotomy: a retrospective study of 54 cases
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019355
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.156878
work_keys_str_mv AT sokhalnavdeep anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases
AT rathgirijaprasad anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases
AT chaturvediarvind anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases
AT dashharihara anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases
AT bithalparmodkumar anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases
AT chandrapsarat anaesthesiaforawakecraniotomyaretrospectivestudyof54cases