Cargando…

A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition

OBJECTIVE: To assess bone thickness for miniscrew placement in the mandible during mixed dentition by using digital volumetric tomograph (DVT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy patients aged 8-10 years old, with early exfoliated mandibular second deciduous molar, were included. DVT images...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattad, Mayur S., Baliga, Sudhindra, Vibhute, Pavan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.055-060.oar
_version_ 1782373254733758464
author Bhattad, Mayur S.
Baliga, Sudhindra
Vibhute, Pavan
author_facet Bhattad, Mayur S.
Baliga, Sudhindra
Vibhute, Pavan
author_sort Bhattad, Mayur S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess bone thickness for miniscrew placement in the mandible during mixed dentition by using digital volumetric tomograph (DVT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy patients aged 8-10 years old, with early exfoliated mandibular second deciduous molar, were included. DVT images of one quadrant of the mandible were obtained using Kodak extraoral imaging systems and analyzed by Kodak dental imaging software. The error of the method (EM) was calculated using Dahlberg's formula. Mean and standard deviation were calculated at 6 and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ).Paired t-test was used to analyze the measurements. RESULTS: Buccal cortical bone thickness, mesiodistal width and buccolingual bone depth at 6 mm were found to be 1.73 + 0.41, 2.15 + 0.49 and 13.18 + 1.22 mm, respectively; while at 8 mm measurements were 2.42 + 0.34, 2.48 + 0.33 and 13.65 + 1.25 mm, respectively. EM for buccal cortical bone thickness, mesiodistal width and buccolingual bone depth was 0.58, 0.40 and 0.48, respectively. The difference in measurement at 6 and 8 mm for buccal cortical plate thickness (P < 0.05) and buccolingual bone thickness (P < 0.05) was found to be significant, whereas for mesiodistal width it was insignificant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bone thickness measurement has shown promising evidence for safe placement of miniscrews in the mandible during mixed dentition. The use of miniscrew is the best alternative, even in younger patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44452262015-05-28 A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition Bhattad, Mayur S. Baliga, Sudhindra Vibhute, Pavan Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess bone thickness for miniscrew placement in the mandible during mixed dentition by using digital volumetric tomograph (DVT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15 healthy patients aged 8-10 years old, with early exfoliated mandibular second deciduous molar, were included. DVT images of one quadrant of the mandible were obtained using Kodak extraoral imaging systems and analyzed by Kodak dental imaging software. The error of the method (EM) was calculated using Dahlberg's formula. Mean and standard deviation were calculated at 6 and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ).Paired t-test was used to analyze the measurements. RESULTS: Buccal cortical bone thickness, mesiodistal width and buccolingual bone depth at 6 mm were found to be 1.73 + 0.41, 2.15 + 0.49 and 13.18 + 1.22 mm, respectively; while at 8 mm measurements were 2.42 + 0.34, 2.48 + 0.33 and 13.65 + 1.25 mm, respectively. EM for buccal cortical bone thickness, mesiodistal width and buccolingual bone depth was 0.58, 0.40 and 0.48, respectively. The difference in measurement at 6 and 8 mm for buccal cortical plate thickness (P < 0.05) and buccolingual bone thickness (P < 0.05) was found to be significant, whereas for mesiodistal width it was insignificant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bone thickness measurement has shown promising evidence for safe placement of miniscrews in the mandible during mixed dentition. The use of miniscrew is the best alternative, even in younger patients. Dental Press International 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4445226/ /pubmed/25992988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.055-060.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Bhattad, Mayur S.
Baliga, Sudhindra
Vibhute, Pavan
A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title_full A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title_fullStr A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title_full_unstemmed A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title_short A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
title_sort digital volumetric tomography (dvt) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.055-060.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattadmayurs adigitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition
AT baligasudhindra adigitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition
AT vibhutepavan adigitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition
AT bhattadmayurs digitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition
AT baligasudhindra digitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition
AT vibhutepavan digitalvolumetrictomographydvtstudyinthemandibularmolarregionforminiscrewplacementduringmixeddentition