Cargando…

Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study

BACKGROUND: The British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR) contains individual-level obstetrical and neonatal medical chart data for virtually all births occurring in British Columbia, Canada. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of information in the BCPDR by performing a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frosst, Gillian, Hutcheon, Jennifer, Joseph, KS, Kinniburgh, Brooke, Johnson, Cathe, Lee, Lily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7
_version_ 1782373266752536576
author Frosst, Gillian
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Joseph, KS
Kinniburgh, Brooke
Johnson, Cathe
Lee, Lily
author_facet Frosst, Gillian
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Joseph, KS
Kinniburgh, Brooke
Johnson, Cathe
Lee, Lily
author_sort Frosst, Gillian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR) contains individual-level obstetrical and neonatal medical chart data for virtually all births occurring in British Columbia, Canada. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of information in the BCPDR by performing a provincial chart re-abstraction study. METHODS: A two-stage stratified clustered sampling design was employed. Obstetrical facilities were stratified based on geographic location and obstetrical volume. Charts of mothers and newborns with a length of stay of five or more days or transfer to another facility following the delivery were oversampled. A total of 85 maternal and 32 newborn variables were assessed for completeness (percent completion) and validity (sensitivity and specificity for categorical variables, intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] for continuous variables). RESULTS: 1,084 maternal and 1,142 newborn charts were abstracted. Mandatory variables such as primary indication for induction and primary indication for cesarean delivery were 100 % complete. Some variables such as pre-pregnancy weight were relatively more complete in the re-abstraction as compared with the BCPDR (83.0 % vs 76.8 %; p < 0.001). The validity of key surveillance variables was high (e.g., HIV screening completed [sensitivity 98.0 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 97.0–98.8 %; specificity 72.3 %, 95 % CI 60.8–81.9 %], induction of labour [sensitivity 93.9 %, 95 % CI 90.2–96.5 %; specificity 98.7 %, 95 % CI 97.7–99.3 %], primary elective cesarean delivery [sensitivity 96.0 %, 95 % CI 83.8–99.7 %; specificity 99.8 %, 95 % CI 99.4–100.0 %], gestational age from newborn examination [ICC 0.99, 95 % CI 0.99–0.99]). Examples of variables with lower validity included total admissions prior to delivery episode, maternal smoking status, and timing of breastfeeding initiation. CONCLUSION: Many important clinical and population health variables in the BCPDR had excellent validity. Some key variables warrant strengthening through improved definitions, system changes, and abstractor training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44452962015-05-28 Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study Frosst, Gillian Hutcheon, Jennifer Joseph, KS Kinniburgh, Brooke Johnson, Cathe Lee, Lily BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry (BCPDR) contains individual-level obstetrical and neonatal medical chart data for virtually all births occurring in British Columbia, Canada. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of information in the BCPDR by performing a provincial chart re-abstraction study. METHODS: A two-stage stratified clustered sampling design was employed. Obstetrical facilities were stratified based on geographic location and obstetrical volume. Charts of mothers and newborns with a length of stay of five or more days or transfer to another facility following the delivery were oversampled. A total of 85 maternal and 32 newborn variables were assessed for completeness (percent completion) and validity (sensitivity and specificity for categorical variables, intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] for continuous variables). RESULTS: 1,084 maternal and 1,142 newborn charts were abstracted. Mandatory variables such as primary indication for induction and primary indication for cesarean delivery were 100 % complete. Some variables such as pre-pregnancy weight were relatively more complete in the re-abstraction as compared with the BCPDR (83.0 % vs 76.8 %; p < 0.001). The validity of key surveillance variables was high (e.g., HIV screening completed [sensitivity 98.0 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 97.0–98.8 %; specificity 72.3 %, 95 % CI 60.8–81.9 %], induction of labour [sensitivity 93.9 %, 95 % CI 90.2–96.5 %; specificity 98.7 %, 95 % CI 97.7–99.3 %], primary elective cesarean delivery [sensitivity 96.0 %, 95 % CI 83.8–99.7 %; specificity 99.8 %, 95 % CI 99.4–100.0 %], gestational age from newborn examination [ICC 0.99, 95 % CI 0.99–0.99]). Examples of variables with lower validity included total admissions prior to delivery episode, maternal smoking status, and timing of breastfeeding initiation. CONCLUSION: Many important clinical and population health variables in the BCPDR had excellent validity. Some key variables warrant strengthening through improved definitions, system changes, and abstractor training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4445296/ /pubmed/26013663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7 Text en © Frosst et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Frosst, Gillian
Hutcheon, Jennifer
Joseph, KS
Kinniburgh, Brooke
Johnson, Cathe
Lee, Lily
Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title_full Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title_fullStr Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title_full_unstemmed Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title_short Validating the British Columbia Perinatal Data Registry: a chart re-abstraction study
title_sort validating the british columbia perinatal data registry: a chart re-abstraction study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0563-7
work_keys_str_mv AT frosstgillian validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy
AT hutcheonjennifer validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy
AT josephks validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy
AT kinniburghbrooke validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy
AT johnsoncathe validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy
AT leelily validatingthebritishcolumbiaperinataldataregistryachartreabstractionstudy