Cargando…

The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey

Adults learning to navigate to a hidden goal within an enclosed space have been found to prefer information provided by the distal cues of an environment, as opposed to proximal landmarks within the environment. Studies with children, however, have shown that 5- or 7-year-olds do not display any pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Matthew G., Haselgrove, Mark, Smith, Alastair D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039054
_version_ 1782373279739150336
author Buckley, Matthew G.
Haselgrove, Mark
Smith, Alastair D.
author_facet Buckley, Matthew G.
Haselgrove, Mark
Smith, Alastair D.
author_sort Buckley, Matthew G.
collection PubMed
description Adults learning to navigate to a hidden goal within an enclosed space have been found to prefer information provided by the distal cues of an environment, as opposed to proximal landmarks within the environment. Studies with children, however, have shown that 5- or 7-year-olds do not display any preference toward distal or proximal cues during navigation. This suggests that a bias toward learning about distal cues occurs somewhere between the age of 7 years and adulthood. We recruited 5- to 11-year-old children and an adult sample to explore the developmental profile of this putative change. Across a series of 3 experiments, participants were required to navigate to a hidden goal in a virtual environment, the location of which was signaled by both extramaze and intramaze landmark cues. During testing, these cues were placed into conflict to assess the search preferences of participants. Consistent with previously reported findings, adults were biased toward using extramaze information. However, analysis of the data from children, which incorporated age as a continuous variable, suggested that older children in our sample were, in fact, biased toward using the intramaze landmark in our task. These findings suggest the bias toward using distal cues in spatial navigation, frequently displayed by adults, may be a comparatively late developing trait, and one that could supersede an initial developmental preference for proximal landmarks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44453892015-06-11 The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey Buckley, Matthew G. Haselgrove, Mark Smith, Alastair D. Dev Psychol Cognitive and Perceptual Development Adults learning to navigate to a hidden goal within an enclosed space have been found to prefer information provided by the distal cues of an environment, as opposed to proximal landmarks within the environment. Studies with children, however, have shown that 5- or 7-year-olds do not display any preference toward distal or proximal cues during navigation. This suggests that a bias toward learning about distal cues occurs somewhere between the age of 7 years and adulthood. We recruited 5- to 11-year-old children and an adult sample to explore the developmental profile of this putative change. Across a series of 3 experiments, participants were required to navigate to a hidden goal in a virtual environment, the location of which was signaled by both extramaze and intramaze landmark cues. During testing, these cues were placed into conflict to assess the search preferences of participants. Consistent with previously reported findings, adults were biased toward using extramaze information. However, analysis of the data from children, which incorporated age as a continuous variable, suggested that older children in our sample were, in fact, biased toward using the intramaze landmark in our task. These findings suggest the bias toward using distal cues in spatial navigation, frequently displayed by adults, may be a comparatively late developing trait, and one that could supersede an initial developmental preference for proximal landmarks. American Psychological Association 2015-04-06 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4445389/ /pubmed/25844850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039054 Text en © 2015 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Cognitive and Perceptual Development
Buckley, Matthew G.
Haselgrove, Mark
Smith, Alastair D.
The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title_full The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title_fullStr The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title_full_unstemmed The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title_short The Developmental Trajectory of Intramaze and Extramaze Landmark Biases in Spatial Navigation: An Unexpected Journey
title_sort developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation: an unexpected journey
topic Cognitive and Perceptual Development
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039054
work_keys_str_mv AT buckleymatthewg thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney
AT haselgrovemark thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney
AT smithalastaird thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney
AT buckleymatthewg developmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney
AT haselgrovemark developmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney
AT smithalastaird developmentaltrajectoryofintramazeandextramazelandmarkbiasesinspatialnavigationanunexpectedjourney