Cargando…

Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data

BACKGROUND: Administrative data are increasingly being used to assess outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of transplant data in healthcare administrative databases compared to the reference standard of information collected directly from transplant centres. DE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Ngan N, McArthur, Eric, Kim, S Joseph, Knoll, Gregory A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0054-9
_version_ 1782373293883392000
author Lam, Ngan N
McArthur, Eric
Kim, S Joseph
Knoll, Gregory A
author_facet Lam, Ngan N
McArthur, Eric
Kim, S Joseph
Knoll, Gregory A
author_sort Lam, Ngan N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Administrative data are increasingly being used to assess outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of transplant data in healthcare administrative databases compared to the reference standard of information collected directly from transplant centres. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One of three major transplant centres in Ontario (Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital – London, and Ottawa Hospital). PATIENTS: Recipients who received a kidney-only transplant between 2008 and 2011. MEASUREMENTS: For each data source, we identified kidney transplants performed. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the administrative data for the reference standard data. METHODS: The data collected from transplant centres were compared with data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) database, a hospital procedural code from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD), and provincial physician billing claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) database. RESULTS: During the study period, the three centres reported a total of 1112 kidney transplants performed. The probability of identifying kidney transplant recipients in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP, given they were identified by the transplant centres (sensitivity), was 96%, 98%, and 98% respectively. The probability that the database code correctly identified a transplant recipient (positive predictive value) in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP was 98%, 98%, and 96% respectively. LIMITATIONS: We validated the information from 2008 to 2011 and cannot attest to the reliability of the data beyond the study period. Specifically, we would not regard this as evidence that applies to the earlier years, shortly after the inception of the databases. Secondly, we were unable to distinguish between first and repeat transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Codes in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP each operate well in the detection of kidney transplant recipients. These data sources can be used to efficiently identify and follow kidney transplant recipients for post-transplant outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4445504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44455042015-05-28 Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data Lam, Ngan N McArthur, Eric Kim, S Joseph Knoll, Gregory A Can J Kidney Health Dis Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Administrative data are increasingly being used to assess outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of transplant data in healthcare administrative databases compared to the reference standard of information collected directly from transplant centres. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One of three major transplant centres in Ontario (Toronto General Hospital, University Hospital – London, and Ottawa Hospital). PATIENTS: Recipients who received a kidney-only transplant between 2008 and 2011. MEASUREMENTS: For each data source, we identified kidney transplants performed. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the administrative data for the reference standard data. METHODS: The data collected from transplant centres were compared with data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) database, a hospital procedural code from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD), and provincial physician billing claims from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) database. RESULTS: During the study period, the three centres reported a total of 1112 kidney transplants performed. The probability of identifying kidney transplant recipients in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP, given they were identified by the transplant centres (sensitivity), was 96%, 98%, and 98% respectively. The probability that the database code correctly identified a transplant recipient (positive predictive value) in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP was 98%, 98%, and 96% respectively. LIMITATIONS: We validated the information from 2008 to 2011 and cannot attest to the reliability of the data beyond the study period. Specifically, we would not regard this as evidence that applies to the earlier years, shortly after the inception of the databases. Secondly, we were unable to distinguish between first and repeat transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Codes in CORR, CIHI, and OHIP each operate well in the detection of kidney transplant recipients. These data sources can be used to efficiently identify and follow kidney transplant recipients for post-transplant outcomes. BioMed Central 2015-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4445504/ /pubmed/26019887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0054-9 Text en © Lam et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lam, Ngan N
McArthur, Eric
Kim, S Joseph
Knoll, Gregory A
Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title_full Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title_fullStr Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title_short Validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
title_sort validation of kidney transplantation using administrative data
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4445504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0054-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lamngann validationofkidneytransplantationusingadministrativedata
AT mcarthureric validationofkidneytransplantationusingadministrativedata
AT kimsjoseph validationofkidneytransplantationusingadministrativedata
AT knollgregorya validationofkidneytransplantationusingadministrativedata