Cargando…
Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109 |
_version_ | 1782373360327458816 |
---|---|
author | Tao, Rong Tu, Shaohua Liu, Chong Yang, Qi Zhu, Min Shen, Jiangfan |
author_facet | Tao, Rong Tu, Shaohua Liu, Chong Yang, Qi Zhu, Min Shen, Jiangfan |
author_sort | Tao, Rong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with lung cancer and 42 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Based on analysis of the detection results, we plotted four standard tumor marker graphs, and compared the results of the highly sensitive nanogold probe and protein chip detection with the results of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) detection used in the clinic. We then analyzed the relationship between the detection results and our clinical data. RESULTS: Four plotted standard protein graphs all had stages with sound linear relationships. It was found in a correlation analysis of the detection results that overall the two methods showed consistency. CONCLUSION: We developed a detection method for ultra-trace protein that can detect four tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragments, neuron-specific enolase, and DKK1 in a highly sensitive way within 1.5 hours by magnifying the signal of nanogold deposition based on protein chips and nanogold probes. By comparing the results from the different detection devices, we have developed an experimental basis for detection of tumor markers in the clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4446013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44460132015-06-08 Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices Tao, Rong Tu, Shaohua Liu, Chong Yang, Qi Zhu, Min Shen, Jiangfan Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with lung cancer and 42 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Based on analysis of the detection results, we plotted four standard tumor marker graphs, and compared the results of the highly sensitive nanogold probe and protein chip detection with the results of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) detection used in the clinic. We then analyzed the relationship between the detection results and our clinical data. RESULTS: Four plotted standard protein graphs all had stages with sound linear relationships. It was found in a correlation analysis of the detection results that overall the two methods showed consistency. CONCLUSION: We developed a detection method for ultra-trace protein that can detect four tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragments, neuron-specific enolase, and DKK1 in a highly sensitive way within 1.5 hours by magnifying the signal of nanogold deposition based on protein chips and nanogold probes. By comparing the results from the different detection devices, we have developed an experimental basis for detection of tumor markers in the clinic. Dove Medical Press 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4446013/ /pubmed/26056472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109 Text en © 2015 Tao et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tao, Rong Tu, Shaohua Liu, Chong Yang, Qi Zhu, Min Shen, Jiangfan Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title | Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title_full | Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title_fullStr | Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title_short | Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
title_sort | comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taorong comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices AT tushaohua comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices AT liuchong comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices AT yangqi comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices AT zhumin comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices AT shenjiangfan comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices |