Cargando…

Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices

BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Rong, Tu, Shaohua, Liu, Chong, Yang, Qi, Zhu, Min, Shen, Jiangfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109
_version_ 1782373360327458816
author Tao, Rong
Tu, Shaohua
Liu, Chong
Yang, Qi
Zhu, Min
Shen, Jiangfan
author_facet Tao, Rong
Tu, Shaohua
Liu, Chong
Yang, Qi
Zhu, Min
Shen, Jiangfan
author_sort Tao, Rong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with lung cancer and 42 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Based on analysis of the detection results, we plotted four standard tumor marker graphs, and compared the results of the highly sensitive nanogold probe and protein chip detection with the results of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) detection used in the clinic. We then analyzed the relationship between the detection results and our clinical data. RESULTS: Four plotted standard protein graphs all had stages with sound linear relationships. It was found in a correlation analysis of the detection results that overall the two methods showed consistency. CONCLUSION: We developed a detection method for ultra-trace protein that can detect four tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragments, neuron-specific enolase, and DKK1 in a highly sensitive way within 1.5 hours by magnifying the signal of nanogold deposition based on protein chips and nanogold probes. By comparing the results from the different detection devices, we have developed an experimental basis for detection of tumor markers in the clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4446013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44460132015-06-08 Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices Tao, Rong Tu, Shaohua Liu, Chong Yang, Qi Zhu, Min Shen, Jiangfan Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: With the development of proteomics, tumor markers have attracted increasing attention for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. As biochip technology and nanotechnology continues to grow, rapid and highly sensitive joint detection of multi-tumor markers has become possible. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with lung cancer and 42 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Based on analysis of the detection results, we plotted four standard tumor marker graphs, and compared the results of the highly sensitive nanogold probe and protein chip detection with the results of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) detection used in the clinic. We then analyzed the relationship between the detection results and our clinical data. RESULTS: Four plotted standard protein graphs all had stages with sound linear relationships. It was found in a correlation analysis of the detection results that overall the two methods showed consistency. CONCLUSION: We developed a detection method for ultra-trace protein that can detect four tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragments, neuron-specific enolase, and DKK1 in a highly sensitive way within 1.5 hours by magnifying the signal of nanogold deposition based on protein chips and nanogold probes. By comparing the results from the different detection devices, we have developed an experimental basis for detection of tumor markers in the clinic. Dove Medical Press 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4446013/ /pubmed/26056472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109 Text en © 2015 Tao et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tao, Rong
Tu, Shaohua
Liu, Chong
Yang, Qi
Zhu, Min
Shen, Jiangfan
Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title_full Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title_fullStr Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title_short Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
title_sort comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S79109
work_keys_str_mv AT taorong comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices
AT tushaohua comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices
AT liuchong comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices
AT yangqi comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices
AT zhumin comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices
AT shenjiangfan comparisonoftumormarkersusingdifferentdetectiondevices