Cargando…

Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models

OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyejoon, Kim, Minji, Chun, Youn-Sic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023539
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113
_version_ 1782373417018720256
author Lee, Hyejoon
Kim, Minji
Chun, Youn-Sic
author_facet Lee, Hyejoon
Kim, Minji
Chun, Youn-Sic
author_sort Lee, Hyejoon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models. RESULTS: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4446372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44463722015-05-28 Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models Lee, Hyejoon Kim, Minji Chun, Youn-Sic Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models. RESULTS: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015-05 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4446372/ /pubmed/26023539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113 Text en © 2015 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hyejoon
Kim, Minji
Chun, Youn-Sic
Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title_full Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title_fullStr Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title_short Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
title_sort comparison of occlusal contact areas of class i and class ii molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023539
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyejoon comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels
AT kimminji comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels
AT chunyounsic comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels