Cargando…
Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models
OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113 |
_version_ | 1782373417018720256 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hyejoon Kim, Minji Chun, Youn-Sic |
author_facet | Lee, Hyejoon Kim, Minji Chun, Youn-Sic |
author_sort | Lee, Hyejoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models. RESULTS: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4446372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Korean Association of Orthodontists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44463722015-05-28 Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models Lee, Hyejoon Kim, Minji Chun, Youn-Sic Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models. RESULTS: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2015-05 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4446372/ /pubmed/26023539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113 Text en © 2015 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Hyejoon Kim, Minji Chun, Youn-Sic Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title | Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title_full | Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title_fullStr | Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title_short | Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
title_sort | comparison of occlusal contact areas of class i and class ii molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehyejoon comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels AT kimminji comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels AT chunyounsic comparisonofocclusalcontactareasofclassiandclassiimolarrelationshipsatfinishingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodels |