Cargando…
Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review
Food consumption surveys are performed in many countries. Comparison of results from those surveys across nations is difficult because of differences in methodological approaches. While consensus about the preferred methodology associated with national food consumption surveys is increasing, no inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25984745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7053587 |
_version_ | 1782373490671747072 |
---|---|
author | De Keyzer, Willem Bracke, Tatiana McNaughton, Sarah A. Parnell, Winsome Moshfegh, Alanna J. Pereira, Rosangela A. Lee, Haeng-Shin van’t Veer, Pieter De Henauw, Stefaan Huybrechts, Inge |
author_facet | De Keyzer, Willem Bracke, Tatiana McNaughton, Sarah A. Parnell, Winsome Moshfegh, Alanna J. Pereira, Rosangela A. Lee, Haeng-Shin van’t Veer, Pieter De Henauw, Stefaan Huybrechts, Inge |
author_sort | De Keyzer, Willem |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food consumption surveys are performed in many countries. Comparison of results from those surveys across nations is difficult because of differences in methodological approaches. While consensus about the preferred methodology associated with national food consumption surveys is increasing, no inventory of methodological aspects across continents is available. The aims of the present review are (1) to develop a framework of key methodological elements related to national food consumption surveys, (2) to create an inventory of these properties of surveys performed in the continents North-America, South-America, Asia and Australasia, and (3) to discuss and compare these methodological properties cross-continentally. A literature search was performed using a fixed set of search terms in different databases. The inventory was completed with all accessible information from all retrieved publications and corresponding authors were requested to provide additional information where missing. Surveys from ten individual countries, originating from four continents are listed in the inventory. The results are presented according to six major aspects of food consumption surveys. The most common dietary intake assessment method used in food consumption surveys worldwide is the 24-HDR (24 h dietary recall), occasionally administered repeatedly, mostly using interview software. Only three countries have incorporated their national food consumption surveys into continuous national health and nutrition examination surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4446769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44467692015-05-29 Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review De Keyzer, Willem Bracke, Tatiana McNaughton, Sarah A. Parnell, Winsome Moshfegh, Alanna J. Pereira, Rosangela A. Lee, Haeng-Shin van’t Veer, Pieter De Henauw, Stefaan Huybrechts, Inge Nutrients Review Food consumption surveys are performed in many countries. Comparison of results from those surveys across nations is difficult because of differences in methodological approaches. While consensus about the preferred methodology associated with national food consumption surveys is increasing, no inventory of methodological aspects across continents is available. The aims of the present review are (1) to develop a framework of key methodological elements related to national food consumption surveys, (2) to create an inventory of these properties of surveys performed in the continents North-America, South-America, Asia and Australasia, and (3) to discuss and compare these methodological properties cross-continentally. A literature search was performed using a fixed set of search terms in different databases. The inventory was completed with all accessible information from all retrieved publications and corresponding authors were requested to provide additional information where missing. Surveys from ten individual countries, originating from four continents are listed in the inventory. The results are presented according to six major aspects of food consumption surveys. The most common dietary intake assessment method used in food consumption surveys worldwide is the 24-HDR (24 h dietary recall), occasionally administered repeatedly, mostly using interview software. Only three countries have incorporated their national food consumption surveys into continuous national health and nutrition examination surveys. MDPI 2015-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4446769/ /pubmed/25984745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7053587 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review De Keyzer, Willem Bracke, Tatiana McNaughton, Sarah A. Parnell, Winsome Moshfegh, Alanna J. Pereira, Rosangela A. Lee, Haeng-Shin van’t Veer, Pieter De Henauw, Stefaan Huybrechts, Inge Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title | Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title_full | Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title_short | Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review |
title_sort | cross-continental comparison of national food consumption survey methods—a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25984745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7053587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekeyzerwillem crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT bracketatiana crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT mcnaughtonsaraha crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT parnellwinsome crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT moshfeghalannaj crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT pereirarosangelaa crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT leehaengshin crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT vantveerpieter crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT dehenauwstefaan crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview AT huybrechtsinge crosscontinentalcomparisonofnationalfoodconsumptionsurveymethodsanarrativereview |