Cargando…

Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsuchida, Kouhei, Iwasaki, Mari, Tsubouchi, Misako, Suzuki, Tsunehiro, Tsuchida, Chieko, Yoshitake, Naoto, Sasai, Takako, Hiraishi, Hideyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25980964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
_version_ 1782373498471055360
author Tsuchida, Kouhei
Iwasaki, Mari
Tsubouchi, Misako
Suzuki, Tsunehiro
Tsuchida, Chieko
Yoshitake, Naoto
Sasai, Takako
Hiraishi, Hideyuki
author_facet Tsuchida, Kouhei
Iwasaki, Mari
Tsubouchi, Misako
Suzuki, Tsunehiro
Tsuchida, Chieko
Yoshitake, Naoto
Sasai, Takako
Hiraishi, Hideyuki
author_sort Tsuchida, Kouhei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. METHODS: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, ≥15 mm) or ≥ 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. RESULTS: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4446805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44468052015-05-29 Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones Tsuchida, Kouhei Iwasaki, Mari Tsubouchi, Misako Suzuki, Tsunehiro Tsuchida, Chieko Yoshitake, Naoto Sasai, Takako Hiraishi, Hideyuki BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (≥3) or large (≥15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. METHODS: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, ≥15 mm) or ≥ 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. RESULTS: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone. BioMed Central 2015-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4446805/ /pubmed/25980964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6 Text en © Tsuchida et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsuchida, Kouhei
Iwasaki, Mari
Tsubouchi, Misako
Suzuki, Tsunehiro
Tsuchida, Chieko
Yoshitake, Naoto
Sasai, Takako
Hiraishi, Hideyuki
Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title_full Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title_fullStr Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title_short Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
title_sort comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25980964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tsuchidakouhei comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT iwasakimari comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT tsubouchimisako comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT suzukitsunehiro comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT tsuchidachieko comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT yoshitakenaoto comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT sasaitakako comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones
AT hiraishihideyuki comparisonoftheusefulnessofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationwithendoscopicsphincterotomyforlargeandmultiplecommonbileductstones