Cargando…

Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program

BACKGROUND: Decision aids educate patients about treatment options and outcomes. Communication aids include question lists, consultation summaries, and audio-recordings. In efficacy studies, decision aids increased patient knowledge, while communication aids increased patient question-asking and inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belkora, Jeff, Volz, Shelley, Loth, Meredith, Teng, Alexandra, Zarin-Pass, Margot, Moore, Dan, Esserman, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0872-6
_version_ 1782373508028825600
author Belkora, Jeff
Volz, Shelley
Loth, Meredith
Teng, Alexandra
Zarin-Pass, Margot
Moore, Dan
Esserman, Laura
author_facet Belkora, Jeff
Volz, Shelley
Loth, Meredith
Teng, Alexandra
Zarin-Pass, Margot
Moore, Dan
Esserman, Laura
author_sort Belkora, Jeff
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision aids educate patients about treatment options and outcomes. Communication aids include question lists, consultation summaries, and audio-recordings. In efficacy studies, decision aids increased patient knowledge, while communication aids increased patient question-asking and information recall. Starting in 2004, we trained successive cohorts of post-baccalaureate, pre-medical interns to coach patients in the use of decision and communication aids at our university-based breast cancer clinic. METHODS: From July 2005 through June 2012, we used the RE-AIM framework to measure Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of our interventions. RESULTS: 1. Reach: Over the study period, our program sent a total of 5,153 decision aids and directly administered 2,004 communication aids. In the most recent program year (2012), out of 1,524 eligible patient appointments, we successfully contacted 1,212 (80 %); coached 1,110 (73 %) in the self-administered use of decision and communication aids; sent 958 (63 %) decision aids; and directly administered communication aids for 419 (27 %) patients. In a 2010 survey, coached patients reported self-administering one or more communication aids in 81 % of visits. 2. Effectiveness: In our pre-post comparisons, decision aids were associated with increased patient knowledge and decreased decisional conflict. Communication aids were associated with increased self-efficacy and number of questions; and with high ratings of patient preparedness and satisfaction. 3. Adoption: Among visitors sent decision aids, 82 % of survey respondents reviewed some or all; among those administered communication aids, 86 % reviewed one or more after the visit. 4. Implementation: Through continuous quality adaptations, we increased the proportion of available staff time used for patient support (i.e. exploitation of workforce capacity) from 29 % in 2005 to 84 % in 2012. 5. Maintenance: The main barrier to sustainability was the cost of paid intern labor. We addressed this by testing a service learning model in which student interns work as program coaches in exchange for academic credit rather than salary. The feasibility test succeeded, and we are now expanding the use of unpaid interns. CONCLUSION: We have sustained a clinic-wide implementation of decision and communication aids through a novel staffing model that uses paid and unpaid student interns as coaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4446845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44468452015-05-29 Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program Belkora, Jeff Volz, Shelley Loth, Meredith Teng, Alexandra Zarin-Pass, Margot Moore, Dan Esserman, Laura BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Decision aids educate patients about treatment options and outcomes. Communication aids include question lists, consultation summaries, and audio-recordings. In efficacy studies, decision aids increased patient knowledge, while communication aids increased patient question-asking and information recall. Starting in 2004, we trained successive cohorts of post-baccalaureate, pre-medical interns to coach patients in the use of decision and communication aids at our university-based breast cancer clinic. METHODS: From July 2005 through June 2012, we used the RE-AIM framework to measure Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of our interventions. RESULTS: 1. Reach: Over the study period, our program sent a total of 5,153 decision aids and directly administered 2,004 communication aids. In the most recent program year (2012), out of 1,524 eligible patient appointments, we successfully contacted 1,212 (80 %); coached 1,110 (73 %) in the self-administered use of decision and communication aids; sent 958 (63 %) decision aids; and directly administered communication aids for 419 (27 %) patients. In a 2010 survey, coached patients reported self-administering one or more communication aids in 81 % of visits. 2. Effectiveness: In our pre-post comparisons, decision aids were associated with increased patient knowledge and decreased decisional conflict. Communication aids were associated with increased self-efficacy and number of questions; and with high ratings of patient preparedness and satisfaction. 3. Adoption: Among visitors sent decision aids, 82 % of survey respondents reviewed some or all; among those administered communication aids, 86 % reviewed one or more after the visit. 4. Implementation: Through continuous quality adaptations, we increased the proportion of available staff time used for patient support (i.e. exploitation of workforce capacity) from 29 % in 2005 to 84 % in 2012. 5. Maintenance: The main barrier to sustainability was the cost of paid intern labor. We addressed this by testing a service learning model in which student interns work as program coaches in exchange for academic credit rather than salary. The feasibility test succeeded, and we are now expanding the use of unpaid interns. CONCLUSION: We have sustained a clinic-wide implementation of decision and communication aids through a novel staffing model that uses paid and unpaid student interns as coaches. BioMed Central 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4446845/ /pubmed/26017564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0872-6 Text en © Belkora et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belkora, Jeff
Volz, Shelley
Loth, Meredith
Teng, Alexandra
Zarin-Pass, Margot
Moore, Dan
Esserman, Laura
Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title_full Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title_fullStr Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title_full_unstemmed Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title_short Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
title_sort coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: re-aim evaluation of a patient support program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0872-6
work_keys_str_mv AT belkorajeff coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT volzshelley coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT lothmeredith coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT tengalexandra coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT zarinpassmargot coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT mooredan coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram
AT essermanlaura coachingpatientsintheuseofdecisionandcommunicationaidsreaimevaluationofapatientsupportprogram