Cargando…

Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines

BACKGROUND: Host genetic makeup plays a role in early gut microbial colonization and immune programming. Interactions between gut microbiota and host cells of the mucosal layer are of paramount importance for a proper development of host defence mechanisms. For different livestock species, it has al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schokker, Dirkjan, Veninga, Gosse, Vastenhouw, Stephanie A., Bossers, Alex, de Bree, Freddy M., Kaal-Lansbergen, Lucia M. T. E., Rebel, Johanna M. J., Smits, Mari A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6
_version_ 1782373525632319488
author Schokker, Dirkjan
Veninga, Gosse
Vastenhouw, Stephanie A.
Bossers, Alex
de Bree, Freddy M.
Kaal-Lansbergen, Lucia M. T. E.
Rebel, Johanna M. J.
Smits, Mari A.
author_facet Schokker, Dirkjan
Veninga, Gosse
Vastenhouw, Stephanie A.
Bossers, Alex
de Bree, Freddy M.
Kaal-Lansbergen, Lucia M. T. E.
Rebel, Johanna M. J.
Smits, Mari A.
author_sort Schokker, Dirkjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Host genetic makeup plays a role in early gut microbial colonization and immune programming. Interactions between gut microbiota and host cells of the mucosal layer are of paramount importance for a proper development of host defence mechanisms. For different livestock species, it has already been shown that particular genotypes have increased susceptibilities towards disease causing pathogens. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of genotypic variation on both early microbial colonization of the gut and functional development of intestinal tissue. From two genetically diverse chicken lines intestinal content samples were taken for microbiota analyses and intestinal tissue samples were extracted for gene expression analyses, both at three subsequent time-points (days 0, 4, and 16). RESULTS: The microbiota composition was significantly different between lines on each time point. In contrast, no significant differences were observed regarding changes in the microbiota diversity between the two lines throughout this study. We also observed trends in the microbiota data at genus level when comparing lines X and Y. We observed that approximately 2000 genes showed different temporal gene expression patterns when comparing line X to line Y. Immunological related differences seem to be only present at day 0, because at day 4 and 16 similar gene expression is observed for these two lines. However, for genes involved in cell cycle related processes the data show higher expression over the whole course of time in line Y in comparison to line X. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the genetic background influences colonization of gut microbiota after hatch in combination with the functional development of intestinal mucosal tissue, including the programming of the immune system. The results indicate that genetically different chicken lines have different coping mechanisms in early life to cope with the outside world. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4446945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44469452015-05-29 Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines Schokker, Dirkjan Veninga, Gosse Vastenhouw, Stephanie A. Bossers, Alex de Bree, Freddy M. Kaal-Lansbergen, Lucia M. T. E. Rebel, Johanna M. J. Smits, Mari A. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Host genetic makeup plays a role in early gut microbial colonization and immune programming. Interactions between gut microbiota and host cells of the mucosal layer are of paramount importance for a proper development of host defence mechanisms. For different livestock species, it has already been shown that particular genotypes have increased susceptibilities towards disease causing pathogens. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of genotypic variation on both early microbial colonization of the gut and functional development of intestinal tissue. From two genetically diverse chicken lines intestinal content samples were taken for microbiota analyses and intestinal tissue samples were extracted for gene expression analyses, both at three subsequent time-points (days 0, 4, and 16). RESULTS: The microbiota composition was significantly different between lines on each time point. In contrast, no significant differences were observed regarding changes in the microbiota diversity between the two lines throughout this study. We also observed trends in the microbiota data at genus level when comparing lines X and Y. We observed that approximately 2000 genes showed different temporal gene expression patterns when comparing line X to line Y. Immunological related differences seem to be only present at day 0, because at day 4 and 16 similar gene expression is observed for these two lines. However, for genes involved in cell cycle related processes the data show higher expression over the whole course of time in line Y in comparison to line X. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the genetic background influences colonization of gut microbiota after hatch in combination with the functional development of intestinal mucosal tissue, including the programming of the immune system. The results indicate that genetically different chicken lines have different coping mechanisms in early life to cope with the outside world. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4446945/ /pubmed/26017153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6 Text en © Schokker et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schokker, Dirkjan
Veninga, Gosse
Vastenhouw, Stephanie A.
Bossers, Alex
de Bree, Freddy M.
Kaal-Lansbergen, Lucia M. T. E.
Rebel, Johanna M. J.
Smits, Mari A.
Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title_full Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title_fullStr Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title_full_unstemmed Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title_short Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
title_sort early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4446945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6
work_keys_str_mv AT schokkerdirkjan earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT veningagosse earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT vastenhouwstephaniea earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT bossersalex earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT debreefreddym earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT kaallansbergenluciamte earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT rebeljohannamj earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines
AT smitsmaria earlylifemicrobialcolonizationofthegutandintestinaldevelopmentdifferbetweengeneticallydivergentbroilerlines