Cargando…

Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review

Background: Reconstruction of scrotal defects after Fournier gangrene is often achieved with skin grafts or flaps, but there is no general consensus on the best method of reconstruction or how to approach the exposed testicle. We systematically reviewed the literature addressing methods of reconstru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karian, Laurel S., Chung, Stella Y., Lee, Edward S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171090
_version_ 1782373549639467008
author Karian, Laurel S.
Chung, Stella Y.
Lee, Edward S.
author_facet Karian, Laurel S.
Chung, Stella Y.
Lee, Edward S.
author_sort Karian, Laurel S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Reconstruction of scrotal defects after Fournier gangrene is often achieved with skin grafts or flaps, but there is no general consensus on the best method of reconstruction or how to approach the exposed testicle. We systematically reviewed the literature addressing methods of reconstruction of Fournier defects after debridement. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from 1950 to 2013. Inclusion criteria were reconstruction for Fournier defects, patients 18 to 90 years old, and reconstructive complication rates reported as whole numbers or percentages. Exclusion criteria were studies focused on methods of debridement or other phases of care rather than reconstruction, studies with fewer than 5 male patients with Fournier defects, literature reviews, and articles not in English. Results: The initial search yielded 982 studies, which was refined to 16 studies with a total pool of 425 patients. There were 25 (5.9%) patients with defects that healed by secondary intention, 44 (10.4%) with delayed primary closure, 36 (8.5%) with implantation of the testicle in a medial thigh pocket, 6 (1.4%) with loose wound approximation, 96 (22.6%) with skin grafts, 68 (16.0%) with scrotal advancement flaps, 128 (30.1%) with flaps, and 22 (5.2%) with flaps or skin grafts in combination with tissue adhesives. Four outcomes were evaluated: number of patients, defect size, method of reconstruction, and wound-healing complications. Conclusions: Most reconstructive techniques provide reliable coverage and protection of testicular function with an acceptable cosmetic result. There is no conclusive evidence to support flap coverage of exposed testes rather than skin graft. A reconstructive algorithm is proposed. Skin grafting or flap reconstruction is recommended for defects larger than 50% of the scrotum or extending beyond the scrotum, whereas scrotal advancement flap reconstruction or healing by secondary intention is best for defects confined to less than 50% of the scrotum that cannot be closed primarily without tension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4447098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44470982015-07-13 Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review Karian, Laurel S. Chung, Stella Y. Lee, Edward S. Eplasty Review Background: Reconstruction of scrotal defects after Fournier gangrene is often achieved with skin grafts or flaps, but there is no general consensus on the best method of reconstruction or how to approach the exposed testicle. We systematically reviewed the literature addressing methods of reconstruction of Fournier defects after debridement. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from 1950 to 2013. Inclusion criteria were reconstruction for Fournier defects, patients 18 to 90 years old, and reconstructive complication rates reported as whole numbers or percentages. Exclusion criteria were studies focused on methods of debridement or other phases of care rather than reconstruction, studies with fewer than 5 male patients with Fournier defects, literature reviews, and articles not in English. Results: The initial search yielded 982 studies, which was refined to 16 studies with a total pool of 425 patients. There were 25 (5.9%) patients with defects that healed by secondary intention, 44 (10.4%) with delayed primary closure, 36 (8.5%) with implantation of the testicle in a medial thigh pocket, 6 (1.4%) with loose wound approximation, 96 (22.6%) with skin grafts, 68 (16.0%) with scrotal advancement flaps, 128 (30.1%) with flaps, and 22 (5.2%) with flaps or skin grafts in combination with tissue adhesives. Four outcomes were evaluated: number of patients, defect size, method of reconstruction, and wound-healing complications. Conclusions: Most reconstructive techniques provide reliable coverage and protection of testicular function with an acceptable cosmetic result. There is no conclusive evidence to support flap coverage of exposed testes rather than skin graft. A reconstructive algorithm is proposed. Skin grafting or flap reconstruction is recommended for defects larger than 50% of the scrotum or extending beyond the scrotum, whereas scrotal advancement flap reconstruction or healing by secondary intention is best for defects confined to less than 50% of the scrotum that cannot be closed primarily without tension. Open Science Company, LLC 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4447098/ /pubmed/26171090 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Karian, Laurel S.
Chung, Stella Y.
Lee, Edward S.
Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title_full Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title_short Reconstruction of Defects After Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review
title_sort reconstruction of defects after fournier gangrene: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171090
work_keys_str_mv AT karianlaurels reconstructionofdefectsafterfourniergangreneasystematicreview
AT chungstellay reconstructionofdefectsafterfourniergangreneasystematicreview
AT leeedwards reconstructionofdefectsafterfourniergangreneasystematicreview