Cargando…

Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake

BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gidlow, Christopher, Ellis, Naomi, Randall, Jason, Cowap, Lisa, Smith, Graham, Iqbal, Zafar, Kumar, Jagdish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092
_version_ 1782373552410853376
author Gidlow, Christopher
Ellis, Naomi
Randall, Jason
Cowap, Lisa
Smith, Graham
Iqbal, Zafar
Kumar, Jagdish
author_facet Gidlow, Christopher
Ellis, Naomi
Randall, Jason
Cowap, Lisa
Smith, Graham
Iqbal, Zafar
Kumar, Jagdish
author_sort Gidlow, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohort study used data from all 4855 individuals invited for an NHS Health Check (September 2010–February 2014) at five general practices in Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable. Predictor variables included the method of invitation, general practice, demographics, deprivation and distance to Health Check location. RESULTS: Mean attendance (61.6%) was above the city and national average, but varied by practice (47.5–83.3%; P < 0.001). Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26–3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained. Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance. Increasing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03–1.04), female gender (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.30–1.68) and living in the least deprived areas (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23–2.05) were all independent positive predictors of attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Using verbal or telephone invitations should be considered to improve Health Check uptake. Other differences in recruitment and delivery that might explain remaining practice-level variation in uptake warrant further exploration. Geographical proximity may not be an important predictor of uptake in urban populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4447133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44471332015-06-15 Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake Gidlow, Christopher Ellis, Naomi Randall, Jason Cowap, Lisa Smith, Graham Iqbal, Zafar Kumar, Jagdish J Public Health (Oxf) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohort study used data from all 4855 individuals invited for an NHS Health Check (September 2010–February 2014) at five general practices in Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable. Predictor variables included the method of invitation, general practice, demographics, deprivation and distance to Health Check location. RESULTS: Mean attendance (61.6%) was above the city and national average, but varied by practice (47.5–83.3%; P < 0.001). Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26–3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained. Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance. Increasing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03–1.04), female gender (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.30–1.68) and living in the least deprived areas (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23–2.05) were all independent positive predictors of attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Using verbal or telephone invitations should be considered to improve Health Check uptake. Other differences in recruitment and delivery that might explain remaining practice-level variation in uptake warrant further exploration. Geographical proximity may not be an important predictor of uptake in urban populations. Oxford University Press 2015-06 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4447133/ /pubmed/25427882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gidlow, Christopher
Ellis, Naomi
Randall, Jason
Cowap, Lisa
Smith, Graham
Iqbal, Zafar
Kumar, Jagdish
Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title_full Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title_fullStr Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title_full_unstemmed Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title_short Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
title_sort method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of nhs health check uptake
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092
work_keys_str_mv AT gidlowchristopher methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT ellisnaomi methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT randalljason methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT cowaplisa methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT smithgraham methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT iqbalzafar methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake
AT kumarjagdish methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake