Cargando…
Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake
BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092 |
_version_ | 1782373552410853376 |
---|---|
author | Gidlow, Christopher Ellis, Naomi Randall, Jason Cowap, Lisa Smith, Graham Iqbal, Zafar Kumar, Jagdish |
author_facet | Gidlow, Christopher Ellis, Naomi Randall, Jason Cowap, Lisa Smith, Graham Iqbal, Zafar Kumar, Jagdish |
author_sort | Gidlow, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohort study used data from all 4855 individuals invited for an NHS Health Check (September 2010–February 2014) at five general practices in Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable. Predictor variables included the method of invitation, general practice, demographics, deprivation and distance to Health Check location. RESULTS: Mean attendance (61.6%) was above the city and national average, but varied by practice (47.5–83.3%; P < 0.001). Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26–3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained. Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance. Increasing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03–1.04), female gender (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.30–1.68) and living in the least deprived areas (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23–2.05) were all independent positive predictors of attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Using verbal or telephone invitations should be considered to improve Health Check uptake. Other differences in recruitment and delivery that might explain remaining practice-level variation in uptake warrant further exploration. Geographical proximity may not be an important predictor of uptake in urban populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4447133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44471332015-06-15 Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake Gidlow, Christopher Ellis, Naomi Randall, Jason Cowap, Lisa Smith, Graham Iqbal, Zafar Kumar, Jagdish J Public Health (Oxf) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Uptake of NHS Health Checks remains below the national target. Better understanding of predictors of uptake can inform targeting and delivery. We explored invitation method and geographical proximity as predictors of uptake in deprived urban communities. METHODS: This observational cohort study used data from all 4855 individuals invited for an NHS Health Check (September 2010–February 2014) at five general practices in Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Attendance/non-attendance was the binary outcome variable. Predictor variables included the method of invitation, general practice, demographics, deprivation and distance to Health Check location. RESULTS: Mean attendance (61.6%) was above the city and national average, but varied by practice (47.5–83.3%; P < 0.001). Telephone/verbal invitations were associated with higher uptake than postal invitations (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.26–3.64), yet significant practice-level variation remained. Distance to Health Check was not associated with attendance. Increasing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03–1.04), female gender (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.30–1.68) and living in the least deprived areas (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.23–2.05) were all independent positive predictors of attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Using verbal or telephone invitations should be considered to improve Health Check uptake. Other differences in recruitment and delivery that might explain remaining practice-level variation in uptake warrant further exploration. Geographical proximity may not be an important predictor of uptake in urban populations. Oxford University Press 2015-06 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4447133/ /pubmed/25427882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gidlow, Christopher Ellis, Naomi Randall, Jason Cowap, Lisa Smith, Graham Iqbal, Zafar Kumar, Jagdish Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title | Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title_full | Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title_fullStr | Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title_short | Method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of NHS Health Check uptake |
title_sort | method of invitation and geographical proximity as predictors of nhs health check uptake |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4447133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gidlowchristopher methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT ellisnaomi methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT randalljason methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT cowaplisa methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT smithgraham methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT iqbalzafar methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake AT kumarjagdish methodofinvitationandgeographicalproximityaspredictorsofnhshealthcheckuptake |