Cargando…
Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines
Grape berry composition mainly consists of primary and secondary metabolites. Both are sensitive to environment and viticultural management. As a consequence, climate change can affect berry composition and modify wine quality and typicity. Leaf removal techniques can impact berry composition by mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26074942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00382 |
_version_ | 1782373642952245248 |
---|---|
author | Bobeica, Natalia Poni, Stefano Hilbert, Ghislaine Renaud, Christel Gomès, Eric Delrot, Serge Dai, Zhanwu |
author_facet | Bobeica, Natalia Poni, Stefano Hilbert, Ghislaine Renaud, Christel Gomès, Eric Delrot, Serge Dai, Zhanwu |
author_sort | Bobeica, Natalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grape berry composition mainly consists of primary and secondary metabolites. Both are sensitive to environment and viticultural management. As a consequence, climate change can affect berry composition and modify wine quality and typicity. Leaf removal techniques can impact berry composition by modulating the source-to-sink balance and, in turn, may mitigate some undesired effects due to climate change. The present study investigated the balance between technological maturity parameters such as sugars and organic acids, and phenolic maturity parameters such as anthocyanins in response to source-sink modulation. Sugar, organic acid, and anthocyanin profiles were compared under two contrasting carbon supply levels in berries of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese collected at 9 and 14 developmental stages respectively. In addition, whole-canopy net carbon exchange rate was monitored for Sangiovese vines and a mathematic model was used to calculate the balance between carbon fixation and berry sugar accumulation. Carbon limitation affected neither berry size nor the concentration of organic acids at harvest. However, it significantly reduced the accumulation of sugars and total anthocyanins in both cultivars. Most interestingly, carbon limitation decreased total anthocyanin concentration by 84.3% as compared to the non source-limited control, whereas it decreased sugar concentration only by 27.1%. This suggests that carbon limitation led to a strong imbalance between sugars and anthocyanins. Moreover, carbon limitation affected anthocyanin profiles in a cultivar dependent manner. Mathematical analysis of carbon-balance indicated that berries used a higher proportion of fixed carbon for sugar accumulation under carbon limitation (76.9%) than under carbon sufficiency (48%). Thus, under carbon limitation, the grape berry can manage the metabolic fate of carbon in such a way that sugar accumulation is maintained at the expense of secondary metabolites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4448006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44480062015-06-12 Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines Bobeica, Natalia Poni, Stefano Hilbert, Ghislaine Renaud, Christel Gomès, Eric Delrot, Serge Dai, Zhanwu Front Plant Sci Plant Science Grape berry composition mainly consists of primary and secondary metabolites. Both are sensitive to environment and viticultural management. As a consequence, climate change can affect berry composition and modify wine quality and typicity. Leaf removal techniques can impact berry composition by modulating the source-to-sink balance and, in turn, may mitigate some undesired effects due to climate change. The present study investigated the balance between technological maturity parameters such as sugars and organic acids, and phenolic maturity parameters such as anthocyanins in response to source-sink modulation. Sugar, organic acid, and anthocyanin profiles were compared under two contrasting carbon supply levels in berries of cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese collected at 9 and 14 developmental stages respectively. In addition, whole-canopy net carbon exchange rate was monitored for Sangiovese vines and a mathematic model was used to calculate the balance between carbon fixation and berry sugar accumulation. Carbon limitation affected neither berry size nor the concentration of organic acids at harvest. However, it significantly reduced the accumulation of sugars and total anthocyanins in both cultivars. Most interestingly, carbon limitation decreased total anthocyanin concentration by 84.3% as compared to the non source-limited control, whereas it decreased sugar concentration only by 27.1%. This suggests that carbon limitation led to a strong imbalance between sugars and anthocyanins. Moreover, carbon limitation affected anthocyanin profiles in a cultivar dependent manner. Mathematical analysis of carbon-balance indicated that berries used a higher proportion of fixed carbon for sugar accumulation under carbon limitation (76.9%) than under carbon sufficiency (48%). Thus, under carbon limitation, the grape berry can manage the metabolic fate of carbon in such a way that sugar accumulation is maintained at the expense of secondary metabolites. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4448006/ /pubmed/26074942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00382 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bobeica, Poni, Hilbert, Renaud, Gomès, Delrot and Dai. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Bobeica, Natalia Poni, Stefano Hilbert, Ghislaine Renaud, Christel Gomès, Eric Delrot, Serge Dai, Zhanwu Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title | Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title_full | Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title_fullStr | Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title_short | Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines |
title_sort | differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in cabernet sauvignon and sangiovese grapevines |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26074942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bobeicanatalia differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT ponistefano differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT hilbertghislaine differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT renaudchristel differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT gomeseric differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT delrotserge differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines AT daizhanwu differentialresponsesofsugarorganicacidsandanthocyaninstosourcesinkmodulationincabernetsauvignonandsangiovesegrapevines |