Cargando…

Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the IS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kearney, R. S., Parsons, N., Underwood, M., Costa, M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25868938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.44.2000400
_version_ 1782373656346755072
author Kearney, R. S.
Parsons, N.
Underwood, M.
Costa, M. L.
author_facet Kearney, R. S.
Parsons, N.
Underwood, M.
Costa, M. L.
author_sort Kearney, R. S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger programme of research. METHODS: We report an online survey of current practice in the United Kingdom, approved by the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and completed by 181 of its members. A total of ten of these respondents were invited for a subsequent one-to-one interview to explore clinician views on proposed further research in this area. RESULTS: The survey showed wide variations in practice, with patients being managed in plaster cast alone (13%), plaster cast followed by orthoses management (68%), and orthoses alone (19%). Within these categories, further variation existed regarding the individual rehabilitation facets, such as the length of time worn, the foot position within them and weight-bearing status. The subsequent interviews reflected this clinical uncertainty and the pressing need for definitive research. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in evidence in this area has resulted in practice in the United Kingdom becoming varied and based on individual opinion. Future high-quality randomised trials on this subject are supported by the clinical community. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:65–9
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44481232015-06-09 Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom Kearney, R. S. Parsons, N. Underwood, M. Costa, M. L. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: The evidence base to inform the management of Achilles tendon rupture is sparse. The objectives of this research were to establish what current practice is in the United Kingdom and explore clinicians’ views on proposed further research in this area. This study was registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN68273773) as part of a larger programme of research. METHODS: We report an online survey of current practice in the United Kingdom, approved by the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and completed by 181 of its members. A total of ten of these respondents were invited for a subsequent one-to-one interview to explore clinician views on proposed further research in this area. RESULTS: The survey showed wide variations in practice, with patients being managed in plaster cast alone (13%), plaster cast followed by orthoses management (68%), and orthoses alone (19%). Within these categories, further variation existed regarding the individual rehabilitation facets, such as the length of time worn, the foot position within them and weight-bearing status. The subsequent interviews reflected this clinical uncertainty and the pressing need for definitive research. CONCLUSIONS: The gap in evidence in this area has resulted in practice in the United Kingdom becoming varied and based on individual opinion. Future high-quality randomised trials on this subject are supported by the clinical community. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:65–9 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4448123/ /pubmed/25868938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.44.2000400 Text en ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Kearney, R. S.
Parsons, N.
Underwood, M.
Costa, M. L.
Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title_full Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title_short Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom
title_sort achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation: a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the united kingdom
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25868938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.44.2000400
work_keys_str_mv AT kearneyrs achillestendonrupturerehabilitationamixedmethodsinvestigationofcurrentpracticeamongorthopaedicsurgeonsintheunitedkingdom
AT parsonsn achillestendonrupturerehabilitationamixedmethodsinvestigationofcurrentpracticeamongorthopaedicsurgeonsintheunitedkingdom
AT underwoodm achillestendonrupturerehabilitationamixedmethodsinvestigationofcurrentpracticeamongorthopaedicsurgeonsintheunitedkingdom
AT costaml achillestendonrupturerehabilitationamixedmethodsinvestigationofcurrentpracticeamongorthopaedicsurgeonsintheunitedkingdom