Cargando…

Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pengpid, Supa, Peltzer, Karl, Puckpinyo, Apa, Viripiromgool, Somchai, Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak, Suthisukhon, Kawinarat, Dumee, Dussanee, Kongtapan, Thiprada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1
_version_ 1782373669691981824
author Pengpid, Supa
Peltzer, Karl
Puckpinyo, Apa
Viripiromgool, Somchai
Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak
Suthisukhon, Kawinarat
Dumee, Dussanee
Kongtapan, Thiprada
author_facet Pengpid, Supa
Peltzer, Karl
Puckpinyo, Apa
Viripiromgool, Somchai
Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak
Suthisukhon, Kawinarat
Dumee, Dussanee
Kongtapan, Thiprada
author_sort Pengpid, Supa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and alcohol moderate risk in four hospitals were randomized into 2 control and 1 intervention condition using the hospital as a unit of randomization (2 intervention and 2 control hospitals) to 405 patients in the two control groups (tobacco only intervention, n = 199, and alcohol only intervention, n = 206) and 215 in the intervention group. The intervention or control consisted of three counselling sessions. RESULTS: Results of the interaction (Group × Time) effects using GEE indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the three study groups over the 6-month follow-up on the ASSIST tobacco score (Wald χ(2) = 8.43, P = 0.004), and past week tobacco use abstinence (Wald χ(2) = 7.34, P = 0.007). Although there were no significant interaction effects on the other outcomes (Alcohol ASSIST score, low alcohol risk score, past week tobacco abstinence or low alcohol risk score, and past week tobacco abstinence and low alcohol risk score), the scores in all of the six outcome measures showed consistent improvements. For past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention. For the outcome of low alcohol risk, the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention was more effective than the tobacco only or alcohol only intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that for past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the polydrug use (alcohol and tobacco) integrated intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44482132015-05-30 Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial Pengpid, Supa Peltzer, Karl Puckpinyo, Apa Viripiromgool, Somchai Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak Suthisukhon, Kawinarat Dumee, Dussanee Kongtapan, Thiprada Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and alcohol moderate risk in four hospitals were randomized into 2 control and 1 intervention condition using the hospital as a unit of randomization (2 intervention and 2 control hospitals) to 405 patients in the two control groups (tobacco only intervention, n = 199, and alcohol only intervention, n = 206) and 215 in the intervention group. The intervention or control consisted of three counselling sessions. RESULTS: Results of the interaction (Group × Time) effects using GEE indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the three study groups over the 6-month follow-up on the ASSIST tobacco score (Wald χ(2) = 8.43, P = 0.004), and past week tobacco use abstinence (Wald χ(2) = 7.34, P = 0.007). Although there were no significant interaction effects on the other outcomes (Alcohol ASSIST score, low alcohol risk score, past week tobacco abstinence or low alcohol risk score, and past week tobacco abstinence and low alcohol risk score), the scores in all of the six outcome measures showed consistent improvements. For past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention. For the outcome of low alcohol risk, the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention was more effective than the tobacco only or alcohol only intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that for past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the polydrug use (alcohol and tobacco) integrated intervention. BioMed Central 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4448213/ /pubmed/26013537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1 Text en © Pengpid et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pengpid, Supa
Peltzer, Karl
Puckpinyo, Apa
Viripiromgool, Somchai
Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak
Suthisukhon, Kawinarat
Dumee, Dussanee
Kongtapan, Thiprada
Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in thailand: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pengpidsupa screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peltzerkarl screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT puckpinyoapa screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT viripiromgoolsomchai screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thammaaphipholkriengsak screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suthisukhonkawinarat screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dumeedussanee screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kongtapanthiprada screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial