Cargando…
Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1 |
_version_ | 1782373669691981824 |
---|---|
author | Pengpid, Supa Peltzer, Karl Puckpinyo, Apa Viripiromgool, Somchai Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak Suthisukhon, Kawinarat Dumee, Dussanee Kongtapan, Thiprada |
author_facet | Pengpid, Supa Peltzer, Karl Puckpinyo, Apa Viripiromgool, Somchai Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak Suthisukhon, Kawinarat Dumee, Dussanee Kongtapan, Thiprada |
author_sort | Pengpid, Supa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and alcohol moderate risk in four hospitals were randomized into 2 control and 1 intervention condition using the hospital as a unit of randomization (2 intervention and 2 control hospitals) to 405 patients in the two control groups (tobacco only intervention, n = 199, and alcohol only intervention, n = 206) and 215 in the intervention group. The intervention or control consisted of three counselling sessions. RESULTS: Results of the interaction (Group × Time) effects using GEE indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the three study groups over the 6-month follow-up on the ASSIST tobacco score (Wald χ(2) = 8.43, P = 0.004), and past week tobacco use abstinence (Wald χ(2) = 7.34, P = 0.007). Although there were no significant interaction effects on the other outcomes (Alcohol ASSIST score, low alcohol risk score, past week tobacco abstinence or low alcohol risk score, and past week tobacco abstinence and low alcohol risk score), the scores in all of the six outcome measures showed consistent improvements. For past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention. For the outcome of low alcohol risk, the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention was more effective than the tobacco only or alcohol only intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that for past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the polydrug use (alcohol and tobacco) integrated intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4448213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44482132015-05-30 Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial Pengpid, Supa Peltzer, Karl Puckpinyo, Apa Viripiromgool, Somchai Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak Suthisukhon, Kawinarat Dumee, Dussanee Kongtapan, Thiprada Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to conduct a cluster randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for conjoint alcohol and tobacco use among hospital out-patients. METHOD: In all 620 hospital out-patients who screened positive for both tobacco and alcohol moderate risk in four hospitals were randomized into 2 control and 1 intervention condition using the hospital as a unit of randomization (2 intervention and 2 control hospitals) to 405 patients in the two control groups (tobacco only intervention, n = 199, and alcohol only intervention, n = 206) and 215 in the intervention group. The intervention or control consisted of three counselling sessions. RESULTS: Results of the interaction (Group × Time) effects using GEE indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the three study groups over the 6-month follow-up on the ASSIST tobacco score (Wald χ(2) = 8.43, P = 0.004), and past week tobacco use abstinence (Wald χ(2) = 7.34, P = 0.007). Although there were no significant interaction effects on the other outcomes (Alcohol ASSIST score, low alcohol risk score, past week tobacco abstinence or low alcohol risk score, and past week tobacco abstinence and low alcohol risk score), the scores in all of the six outcome measures showed consistent improvements. For past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention. For the outcome of low alcohol risk, the alcohol only intervention and the integrated alcohol and tobacco intervention was more effective than the tobacco only or alcohol only intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that for past week tobacco abstinence the tobacco only intervention was more effective than the alcohol only intervention and the polydrug use (alcohol and tobacco) integrated intervention. BioMed Central 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4448213/ /pubmed/26013537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1 Text en © Pengpid et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pengpid, Supa Peltzer, Karl Puckpinyo, Apa Viripiromgool, Somchai Thamma-aphiphol, Kriengsak Suthisukhon, Kawinarat Dumee, Dussanee Kongtapan, Thiprada Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | screening and concurrent brief intervention of conjoint hazardous or harmful alcohol and tobacco use in hospital out-patients in thailand: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26013537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0018-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengpidsupa screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT peltzerkarl screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT puckpinyoapa screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT viripiromgoolsomchai screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thammaaphipholkriengsak screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suthisukhonkawinarat screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dumeedussanee screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kongtapanthiprada screeningandconcurrentbriefinterventionofconjointhazardousorharmfulalcoholandtobaccouseinhospitaloutpatientsinthailandarandomizedcontrolledtrial |