Cargando…

Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review

AIM: The intraocular silicone oil (SO) tamponades used in the treatment of retinal detachment (RD) have been associated with a difference ocular hypertension (OH) rate. To clarify, if this complication was associated to use of standard SO (SSO) versus heavy SO (HSO), we performed a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romano, Vito, Cruciani, Mario, Semeraro, Francesco, Costagliola, Ciro, Romano, Mario R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.156922
_version_ 1782373674760798208
author Romano, Vito
Cruciani, Mario
Semeraro, Francesco
Costagliola, Ciro
Romano, Mario R
author_facet Romano, Vito
Cruciani, Mario
Semeraro, Francesco
Costagliola, Ciro
Romano, Mario R
author_sort Romano, Vito
collection PubMed
description AIM: The intraocular silicone oil (SO) tamponades used in the treatment of retinal detachment (RD) have been associated with a difference ocular hypertension (OH) rate. To clarify, if this complication was associated to use of standard SO (SSO) versus heavy SO (HSO), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative study between two kind of SO (standard or light vs. heavy) for the treatment of RD and macular hole, without restriction to study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methodological quality of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the criteria given in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention, while three non-RCTs were assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists. We calculated Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The primary outcome was the rate of patients with OH treated with SSO compared to HSO. RESULTS: There were a higher number of rates of OH in HSO compared to SSO. This difference was statistically significant with the fixed effect model (Mantel-Haenszel RR; 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06–2.28; P = 0.02) while there was not significative difference with the random effect model (Mantel-Haenszel RR; 1.51; 95% CI, 0.98–2.33; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: We noted a trend that points out a higher OH rate in HSO group compared to SSO, but this finding, due to the small size and variable design of studies, needs to be confirmed in well-designed and large size RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44482352015-06-11 Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review Romano, Vito Cruciani, Mario Semeraro, Francesco Costagliola, Ciro Romano, Mario R Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: The intraocular silicone oil (SO) tamponades used in the treatment of retinal detachment (RD) have been associated with a difference ocular hypertension (OH) rate. To clarify, if this complication was associated to use of standard SO (SSO) versus heavy SO (HSO), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative study between two kind of SO (standard or light vs. heavy) for the treatment of RD and macular hole, without restriction to study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methodological quality of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the criteria given in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention, while three non-RCTs were assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists. We calculated Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The primary outcome was the rate of patients with OH treated with SSO compared to HSO. RESULTS: There were a higher number of rates of OH in HSO compared to SSO. This difference was statistically significant with the fixed effect model (Mantel-Haenszel RR; 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06–2.28; P = 0.02) while there was not significative difference with the random effect model (Mantel-Haenszel RR; 1.51; 95% CI, 0.98–2.33; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: We noted a trend that points out a higher OH rate in HSO group compared to SSO, but this finding, due to the small size and variable design of studies, needs to be confirmed in well-designed and large size RCTs. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4448235/ /pubmed/25971167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.156922 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Romano, Vito
Cruciani, Mario
Semeraro, Francesco
Costagliola, Ciro
Romano, Mario R
Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title_full Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title_fullStr Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title_short Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: A systematic review
title_sort development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.156922
work_keys_str_mv AT romanovito developmentofocularhypertensionsecondarytotamponadewithlightversusheavysiliconeoilasystematicreview
AT crucianimario developmentofocularhypertensionsecondarytotamponadewithlightversusheavysiliconeoilasystematicreview
AT semerarofrancesco developmentofocularhypertensionsecondarytotamponadewithlightversusheavysiliconeoilasystematicreview
AT costagliolaciro developmentofocularhypertensionsecondarytotamponadewithlightversusheavysiliconeoilasystematicreview
AT romanomarior developmentofocularhypertensionsecondarytotamponadewithlightversusheavysiliconeoilasystematicreview