Cargando…

Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities

CONTEXT: National efforts are underway to classify a minimum set of public health services that all jurisdictions throughout the United States should provide regardless of location. Such a set of basic programs would be supported by crosscutting services, known as the “foundational capabilities” (FC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leider, Jonathon P., Juliano, Chrissie, Castrucci, Brian C., Beitsch, Leslie M., Dilley, Abby, Nelson, Rachel, Kaiman, Sherry, Sprague, James B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25486134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000189
_version_ 1782373744811966464
author Leider, Jonathon P.
Juliano, Chrissie
Castrucci, Brian C.
Beitsch, Leslie M.
Dilley, Abby
Nelson, Rachel
Kaiman, Sherry
Sprague, James B.
author_facet Leider, Jonathon P.
Juliano, Chrissie
Castrucci, Brian C.
Beitsch, Leslie M.
Dilley, Abby
Nelson, Rachel
Kaiman, Sherry
Sprague, James B.
author_sort Leider, Jonathon P.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: National efforts are underway to classify a minimum set of public health services that all jurisdictions throughout the United States should provide regardless of location. Such a set of basic programs would be supported by crosscutting services, known as the “foundational capabilities” (FCs). These FCs are assessment services, preparedness and disaster response, policy development, communications, community partnership, and organizational support activities. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain familiarity with the term and concept of FCs and gather related perspectives from state and local public health practitioners. DESIGN: In fall 2013, we interviewed 50 leaders from state and local health departments. We asked about familiarity with the term “foundational capabilities,” as well as the broader concept of FCs. We attempted to triangulate the utility of the FC concept by asking respondents about priority programs and services, about perceived unique contributions made by public health, and about prevalence and funding for the FCs. SETTING: Telephone-based interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty leaders of state and local health departments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practitioner familiarity with and perspectives on the FCs, information about current funding streams for public health, and the likelihood of creating nationwide FCs that would be recognized and accepted by all jurisdictions. RESULTS: Slightly more than half of the leaders interviewed said that they were familiar with the concept of FCs. In most cases, health departments had all of the capabilities to some degree, although operationalization varied. Few indicated that current funding levels were sufficient to support implementing a minimum level of FCs nationally. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were not able to articulate the current or optimal levels of services for the various capabilities, nor the costs associated with them. Further research is needed to understand the role of FCs as part of the foundational public health services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44486702015-08-19 Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities Leider, Jonathon P. Juliano, Chrissie Castrucci, Brian C. Beitsch, Leslie M. Dilley, Abby Nelson, Rachel Kaiman, Sherry Sprague, James B. J Public Health Manag Pract Original Articles CONTEXT: National efforts are underway to classify a minimum set of public health services that all jurisdictions throughout the United States should provide regardless of location. Such a set of basic programs would be supported by crosscutting services, known as the “foundational capabilities” (FCs). These FCs are assessment services, preparedness and disaster response, policy development, communications, community partnership, and organizational support activities. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain familiarity with the term and concept of FCs and gather related perspectives from state and local public health practitioners. DESIGN: In fall 2013, we interviewed 50 leaders from state and local health departments. We asked about familiarity with the term “foundational capabilities,” as well as the broader concept of FCs. We attempted to triangulate the utility of the FC concept by asking respondents about priority programs and services, about perceived unique contributions made by public health, and about prevalence and funding for the FCs. SETTING: Telephone-based interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty leaders of state and local health departments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Practitioner familiarity with and perspectives on the FCs, information about current funding streams for public health, and the likelihood of creating nationwide FCs that would be recognized and accepted by all jurisdictions. RESULTS: Slightly more than half of the leaders interviewed said that they were familiar with the concept of FCs. In most cases, health departments had all of the capabilities to some degree, although operationalization varied. Few indicated that current funding levels were sufficient to support implementing a minimum level of FCs nationally. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were not able to articulate the current or optimal levels of services for the various capabilities, nor the costs associated with them. Further research is needed to understand the role of FCs as part of the foundational public health services. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-07 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4448670/ /pubmed/25486134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000189 Text en © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Leider, Jonathon P.
Juliano, Chrissie
Castrucci, Brian C.
Beitsch, Leslie M.
Dilley, Abby
Nelson, Rachel
Kaiman, Sherry
Sprague, James B.
Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title_full Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title_fullStr Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title_short Practitioner Perspectives on Foundational Capabilities
title_sort practitioner perspectives on foundational capabilities
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25486134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000189
work_keys_str_mv AT leiderjonathonp practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT julianochrissie practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT castruccibrianc practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT beitschlesliem practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT dilleyabby practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT nelsonrachel practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT kaimansherry practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities
AT spraguejamesb practitionerperspectivesonfoundationalcapabilities