Cargando…

Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey

INTRODUCTION: Resident aesthetic clinics (RACs) have demonstrated good outcomes and acceptable patient satisfaction, but few studies have evaluated their educational, financial, or medicolegal components. We sought to determine RAC best practices. METHODS: We surveyed American Council of Academic Pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hultman, C. Scott, Wu, Cindy, Bentz, Michael L., Redett, Richard J., Shack, R. Bruce, David, Lisa R., Taub, Peter J., Janis, Jeffrey E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26146599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000464864.49568.18
_version_ 1782373751898243072
author Hultman, C. Scott
Wu, Cindy
Bentz, Michael L.
Redett, Richard J.
Shack, R. Bruce
David, Lisa R.
Taub, Peter J.
Janis, Jeffrey E.
author_facet Hultman, C. Scott
Wu, Cindy
Bentz, Michael L.
Redett, Richard J.
Shack, R. Bruce
David, Lisa R.
Taub, Peter J.
Janis, Jeffrey E.
author_sort Hultman, C. Scott
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Resident aesthetic clinics (RACs) have demonstrated good outcomes and acceptable patient satisfaction, but few studies have evaluated their educational, financial, or medicolegal components. We sought to determine RAC best practices. METHODS: We surveyed American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members (n = 399), focusing on operational details, resident supervision, patient safety, medicolegal history, financial viability, and research opportunities. Of the 96 respondents, 63 reported having a RAC, and 56% of plastic surgery residency program directors responded. RESULTS: RACs averaged 243 patient encounters and 53.9 procedures annually, having been in existence for 19.6 years (mean). Full-time faculty (73%) supervised chief residents (84%) in all aspects of care (65%). Of the 63 RACs, 45 were accredited, 40 had licensed procedural suites, 28 had inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 31 used anesthesiologists. Seventeen had overnight capability, and 17 had a Life Safety Plan. No cases of malignant hyperthermia occurred, but 1 facility death was reported. Sixteen RACs had been involved in a lawsuit, and 33 respondents reported financial viability of the RACs. Net revenue was transferred to both the residents’ educational fund (41%) and divisional/departmental overhead (37%). Quality measures included case logs (78%), morbidity/mortality conference (62%), resident surveys (52%), and patient satisfaction scores (46%). Of 63 respondents, 14 have presented or published RAC-specific research; 80 of 96 of those who were surveyed believed RACs enhanced education. CONCLUSIONS: RACs are an important component of plastic surgery education. Most clinics are financially viable but carry high malpractice risk and consume significant resources. Best practices, to maximize patient safety and optimize resident education, include use of accredited procedural rooms and direct faculty supervision of all components of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44487222015-07-04 Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey Hultman, C. Scott Wu, Cindy Bentz, Michael L. Redett, Richard J. Shack, R. Bruce David, Lisa R. Taub, Peter J. Janis, Jeffrey E. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014 ACAPS Congress: Meeting Proceeding INTRODUCTION: Resident aesthetic clinics (RACs) have demonstrated good outcomes and acceptable patient satisfaction, but few studies have evaluated their educational, financial, or medicolegal components. We sought to determine RAC best practices. METHODS: We surveyed American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeon members (n = 399), focusing on operational details, resident supervision, patient safety, medicolegal history, financial viability, and research opportunities. Of the 96 respondents, 63 reported having a RAC, and 56% of plastic surgery residency program directors responded. RESULTS: RACs averaged 243 patient encounters and 53.9 procedures annually, having been in existence for 19.6 years (mean). Full-time faculty (73%) supervised chief residents (84%) in all aspects of care (65%). Of the 63 RACs, 45 were accredited, 40 had licensed procedural suites, 28 had inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 31 used anesthesiologists. Seventeen had overnight capability, and 17 had a Life Safety Plan. No cases of malignant hyperthermia occurred, but 1 facility death was reported. Sixteen RACs had been involved in a lawsuit, and 33 respondents reported financial viability of the RACs. Net revenue was transferred to both the residents’ educational fund (41%) and divisional/departmental overhead (37%). Quality measures included case logs (78%), morbidity/mortality conference (62%), resident surveys (52%), and patient satisfaction scores (46%). Of 63 respondents, 14 have presented or published RAC-specific research; 80 of 96 of those who were surveyed believed RACs enhanced education. CONCLUSIONS: RACs are an important component of plastic surgery education. Most clinics are financially viable but carry high malpractice risk and consume significant resources. Best practices, to maximize patient safety and optimize resident education, include use of accredited procedural rooms and direct faculty supervision of all components of care. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4448722/ /pubmed/26146599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000464864.49568.18 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle 2014 ACAPS Congress: Meeting Proceeding
Hultman, C. Scott
Wu, Cindy
Bentz, Michael L.
Redett, Richard J.
Shack, R. Bruce
David, Lisa R.
Taub, Peter J.
Janis, Jeffrey E.
Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title_full Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title_fullStr Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title_short Identification of Best Practices for Resident Aesthetic Clinics in Plastic Surgery Training: The ACAPS National Survey
title_sort identification of best practices for resident aesthetic clinics in plastic surgery training: the acaps national survey
topic 2014 ACAPS Congress: Meeting Proceeding
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26146599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000464864.49568.18
work_keys_str_mv AT hultmancscott identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT wucindy identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT bentzmichaell identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT redettrichardj identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT shackrbruce identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT davidlisar identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT taubpeterj identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey
AT janisjeffreye identificationofbestpracticesforresidentaestheticclinicsinplasticsurgerytrainingtheacapsnationalsurvey