Cargando…

From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data

Modern 3D electron microscopy approaches have recently allowed unprecedented insight into the 3D ultrastructural organization of cells and tissues, enabling the visualization of large macromolecular machines, such as adhesion complexes, as well as higher-order structures, such as the cytoskeleton an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Wen-Ting, Hassan, Ahmed, Sarkar, Purbasha, Correa, Joaquin, Metlagel, Zoltan, Jorgens, Danielle M., Auer, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MyJove Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25145678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/51673
_version_ 1782373792185581568
author Tsai, Wen-Ting
Hassan, Ahmed
Sarkar, Purbasha
Correa, Joaquin
Metlagel, Zoltan
Jorgens, Danielle M.
Auer, Manfred
author_facet Tsai, Wen-Ting
Hassan, Ahmed
Sarkar, Purbasha
Correa, Joaquin
Metlagel, Zoltan
Jorgens, Danielle M.
Auer, Manfred
author_sort Tsai, Wen-Ting
collection PubMed
description Modern 3D electron microscopy approaches have recently allowed unprecedented insight into the 3D ultrastructural organization of cells and tissues, enabling the visualization of large macromolecular machines, such as adhesion complexes, as well as higher-order structures, such as the cytoskeleton and cellular organelles in their respective cell and tissue context. Given the inherent complexity of cellular volumes, it is essential to first extract the features of interest in order to allow visualization, quantification, and therefore comprehension of their 3D organization. Each data set is defined by distinct characteristics, e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, crispness (sharpness) of the data, heterogeneity of its features, crowdedness of features, presence or absence of characteristic shapes that allow for easy identification, and the percentage of the entire volume that a specific region of interest occupies. All these characteristics need to be considered when deciding on which approach to take for segmentation. The six different 3D ultrastructural data sets presented were obtained by three different imaging approaches: resin embedded stained electron tomography, focused ion beam- and serial block face- scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM, SBF-SEM) of mildly stained and heavily stained samples, respectively. For these data sets, four different segmentation approaches have been applied: (1) fully manual model building followed solely by visualization of the model, (2) manual tracing segmentation of the data followed by surface rendering, (3) semi-automated approaches followed by surface rendering, or (4) automated custom-designed segmentation algorithms followed by surface rendering and quantitative analysis. Depending on the combination of data set characteristics, it was found that typically one of these four categorical approaches outperforms the others, but depending on the exact sequence of criteria, more than one approach may be successful. Based on these data, we propose a triage scheme that categorizes both objective data set characteristics and subjective personal criteria for the analysis of the different data sets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4448944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MyJove Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44489442015-08-13 From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data Tsai, Wen-Ting Hassan, Ahmed Sarkar, Purbasha Correa, Joaquin Metlagel, Zoltan Jorgens, Danielle M. Auer, Manfred J Vis Exp Bioengineering Modern 3D electron microscopy approaches have recently allowed unprecedented insight into the 3D ultrastructural organization of cells and tissues, enabling the visualization of large macromolecular machines, such as adhesion complexes, as well as higher-order structures, such as the cytoskeleton and cellular organelles in their respective cell and tissue context. Given the inherent complexity of cellular volumes, it is essential to first extract the features of interest in order to allow visualization, quantification, and therefore comprehension of their 3D organization. Each data set is defined by distinct characteristics, e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, crispness (sharpness) of the data, heterogeneity of its features, crowdedness of features, presence or absence of characteristic shapes that allow for easy identification, and the percentage of the entire volume that a specific region of interest occupies. All these characteristics need to be considered when deciding on which approach to take for segmentation. The six different 3D ultrastructural data sets presented were obtained by three different imaging approaches: resin embedded stained electron tomography, focused ion beam- and serial block face- scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM, SBF-SEM) of mildly stained and heavily stained samples, respectively. For these data sets, four different segmentation approaches have been applied: (1) fully manual model building followed solely by visualization of the model, (2) manual tracing segmentation of the data followed by surface rendering, (3) semi-automated approaches followed by surface rendering, or (4) automated custom-designed segmentation algorithms followed by surface rendering and quantitative analysis. Depending on the combination of data set characteristics, it was found that typically one of these four categorical approaches outperforms the others, but depending on the exact sequence of criteria, more than one approach may be successful. Based on these data, we propose a triage scheme that categorizes both objective data set characteristics and subjective personal criteria for the analysis of the different data sets. MyJove Corporation 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4448944/ /pubmed/25145678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/51673 Text en Copyright © 2014, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Bioengineering
Tsai, Wen-Ting
Hassan, Ahmed
Sarkar, Purbasha
Correa, Joaquin
Metlagel, Zoltan
Jorgens, Danielle M.
Auer, Manfred
From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title_full From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title_fullStr From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title_full_unstemmed From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title_short From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
title_sort from voxels to knowledge: a practical guide to the segmentation of complex electron microscopy 3d-data
topic Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4448944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25145678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/51673
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaiwenting fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT hassanahmed fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT sarkarpurbasha fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT correajoaquin fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT metlagelzoltan fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT jorgensdaniellem fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata
AT auermanfred fromvoxelstoknowledgeapracticalguidetothesegmentationofcomplexelectronmicroscopy3ddata