Cargando…

Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feichtinger, Michael, Stopp, Tina, Göbl, Christian, Feichtinger, Elisabeth, Vaccari, Enrico, Mädel, Ulrike, Laccone, Franco, Stroh-Weigert, Monika, Hengstschläger, Markus, Feichtinger, Wilfried, Neesen, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128317
_version_ 1782373807097380864
author Feichtinger, Michael
Stopp, Tina
Göbl, Christian
Feichtinger, Elisabeth
Vaccari, Enrico
Mädel, Ulrike
Laccone, Franco
Stroh-Weigert, Monika
Hengstschläger, Markus
Feichtinger, Wilfried
Neesen, Jürgen
author_facet Feichtinger, Michael
Stopp, Tina
Göbl, Christian
Feichtinger, Elisabeth
Vaccari, Enrico
Mädel, Ulrike
Laccone, Franco
Stroh-Weigert, Monika
Hengstschläger, Markus
Feichtinger, Wilfried
Neesen, Jürgen
author_sort Feichtinger, Michael
collection PubMed
description Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays is widely applied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cells. Recently, an increase in the pregnancy rate has been demonstrated using array-CGH to evaluate trophectoderm cells. However, in some countries, the analysis of embryonic cells is restricted by law. Therefore, we used BAC array-CGH to assess the impact of polar body analysis on the live birth rate. A disadvantage of polar body aneuploidy screening is the necessity of the analysis of both the first and second polar bodies, resulting in increases in costs for the patient and complex data interpretation. Aneuploidy screening results may sometimes be ambiguous if the first and second polar bodies show reciprocal chromosomal aberrations. To overcome this disadvantage, we tested a strategy involving the pooling of DNA from both polar bodies before DNA amplification. We retrospectively studied 351 patients, of whom 111 underwent polar body array-CGH before embryo transfer. In the group receiving pooled polar body array-CGH (aCGH) analysis, 110 embryos were transferred, and 29 babies were born, corresponding to live birth rates of 26.4% per embryo and 35.7% per patient. In contrast, in the control group, the IVF treatment was performed without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). For this group, 403 embryos were transferred, and 60 babies were born, resulting in live birth rates of 14.9% per embryo and 22.7% per patient. In conclusion, our data show that in the aCGH group, the use of aneuploidy screening resulted in a significantly higher live birth rate compared with the control group, supporting the benefit of PGS for IVF couples in addition to the suitability and effectiveness of our polar body pooling strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44490322015-06-09 Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Feichtinger, Michael Stopp, Tina Göbl, Christian Feichtinger, Elisabeth Vaccari, Enrico Mädel, Ulrike Laccone, Franco Stroh-Weigert, Monika Hengstschläger, Markus Feichtinger, Wilfried Neesen, Jürgen PLoS One Research Article Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays is widely applied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cells. Recently, an increase in the pregnancy rate has been demonstrated using array-CGH to evaluate trophectoderm cells. However, in some countries, the analysis of embryonic cells is restricted by law. Therefore, we used BAC array-CGH to assess the impact of polar body analysis on the live birth rate. A disadvantage of polar body aneuploidy screening is the necessity of the analysis of both the first and second polar bodies, resulting in increases in costs for the patient and complex data interpretation. Aneuploidy screening results may sometimes be ambiguous if the first and second polar bodies show reciprocal chromosomal aberrations. To overcome this disadvantage, we tested a strategy involving the pooling of DNA from both polar bodies before DNA amplification. We retrospectively studied 351 patients, of whom 111 underwent polar body array-CGH before embryo transfer. In the group receiving pooled polar body array-CGH (aCGH) analysis, 110 embryos were transferred, and 29 babies were born, corresponding to live birth rates of 26.4% per embryo and 35.7% per patient. In contrast, in the control group, the IVF treatment was performed without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). For this group, 403 embryos were transferred, and 60 babies were born, resulting in live birth rates of 14.9% per embryo and 22.7% per patient. In conclusion, our data show that in the aCGH group, the use of aneuploidy screening resulted in a significantly higher live birth rate compared with the control group, supporting the benefit of PGS for IVF couples in addition to the suitability and effectiveness of our polar body pooling strategy. Public Library of Science 2015-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4449032/ /pubmed/26024488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128317 Text en © 2015 Feichtinger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feichtinger, Michael
Stopp, Tina
Göbl, Christian
Feichtinger, Elisabeth
Vaccari, Enrico
Mädel, Ulrike
Laccone, Franco
Stroh-Weigert, Monika
Hengstschläger, Markus
Feichtinger, Wilfried
Neesen, Jürgen
Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_full Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_fullStr Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_short Increasing Live Birth Rate by Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Pooled Polar Bodies Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_sort increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128317
work_keys_str_mv AT feichtingermichael increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT stopptina increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT goblchristian increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT feichtingerelisabeth increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT vaccarienrico increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT madelulrike increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT lacconefranco increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT strohweigertmonika increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT hengstschlagermarkus increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT feichtingerwilfried increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT neesenjurgen increasinglivebirthratebypreimplantationgeneticscreeningofpooledpolarbodiesusingarraycomparativegenomichybridization