Cargando…

Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy

AIMS: Interval cancer is a key factor that influences the effectiveness of a cancer screening program. To evaluate the impact of interval cancer on the effectiveness of endoscopic screening, the survival rates of patients with interval cancer were analyzed. METHODS: We performed gastric cancer-speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamashima, Chisato, Shabana, Michiko, Okamoto, Mikizo, Osaki, Yoneatsu, Kishimoto, Takuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126796
_version_ 1782373830066438144
author Hamashima, Chisato
Shabana, Michiko
Okamoto, Mikizo
Osaki, Yoneatsu
Kishimoto, Takuji
author_facet Hamashima, Chisato
Shabana, Michiko
Okamoto, Mikizo
Osaki, Yoneatsu
Kishimoto, Takuji
author_sort Hamashima, Chisato
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Interval cancer is a key factor that influences the effectiveness of a cancer screening program. To evaluate the impact of interval cancer on the effectiveness of endoscopic screening, the survival rates of patients with interval cancer were analyzed. METHODS: We performed gastric cancer-specific and all-causes survival analyses of patients with screen-detected cancer and patients with interval cancer in the endoscopic screening group and radiographic screening group using the Kaplan-Meier method. Since the screening interval was 1 year, interval cancer was defined as gastric cancer detected within 1 year after a negative result. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the risk factors associated with gastric cancer-specific and all-causes death. RESULTS: A total of 1,493 gastric cancer patients (endoscopic screening group: n = 347; radiographic screening group: n = 166; outpatient group: n = 980) were identified from the Tottori Cancer Registry from 2001 to 2008. The gastric cancer-specific survival rates were higher in the endoscopic screening group than in the radiographic screening group and the outpatients group. In the endoscopic screening group, the gastric cancer-specific survival rate of the patients with screen-detected cancer and the patients with interval cancer were nearly equal (P = 0.869). In the radiographic screening group, the gastric cancer-specific survival rate of the patients with screen-detected cancer was higher than that of the patients with interval cancer (P = 0.009). For gastric cancer-specific death, the hazard ratio of interval cancer in the endoscopic screening group was 0.216 for gastric cancer death (95%CI: 0.054-0.868) compared with the outpatient group. CONCLUSION: The survival rate and the risk of gastric cancer death among the patients with screen-detected cancer and patients with interval cancer were not significantly different in the annual endoscopic screening. These results suggest the potential of endoscopic screening in reducing mortality from gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44492132015-06-09 Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy Hamashima, Chisato Shabana, Michiko Okamoto, Mikizo Osaki, Yoneatsu Kishimoto, Takuji PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Interval cancer is a key factor that influences the effectiveness of a cancer screening program. To evaluate the impact of interval cancer on the effectiveness of endoscopic screening, the survival rates of patients with interval cancer were analyzed. METHODS: We performed gastric cancer-specific and all-causes survival analyses of patients with screen-detected cancer and patients with interval cancer in the endoscopic screening group and radiographic screening group using the Kaplan-Meier method. Since the screening interval was 1 year, interval cancer was defined as gastric cancer detected within 1 year after a negative result. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the risk factors associated with gastric cancer-specific and all-causes death. RESULTS: A total of 1,493 gastric cancer patients (endoscopic screening group: n = 347; radiographic screening group: n = 166; outpatient group: n = 980) were identified from the Tottori Cancer Registry from 2001 to 2008. The gastric cancer-specific survival rates were higher in the endoscopic screening group than in the radiographic screening group and the outpatients group. In the endoscopic screening group, the gastric cancer-specific survival rate of the patients with screen-detected cancer and the patients with interval cancer were nearly equal (P = 0.869). In the radiographic screening group, the gastric cancer-specific survival rate of the patients with screen-detected cancer was higher than that of the patients with interval cancer (P = 0.009). For gastric cancer-specific death, the hazard ratio of interval cancer in the endoscopic screening group was 0.216 for gastric cancer death (95%CI: 0.054-0.868) compared with the outpatient group. CONCLUSION: The survival rate and the risk of gastric cancer death among the patients with screen-detected cancer and patients with interval cancer were not significantly different in the annual endoscopic screening. These results suggest the potential of endoscopic screening in reducing mortality from gastric cancer. Public Library of Science 2015-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4449213/ /pubmed/26023768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126796 Text en © 2015 Hamashima et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamashima, Chisato
Shabana, Michiko
Okamoto, Mikizo
Osaki, Yoneatsu
Kishimoto, Takuji
Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title_full Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title_fullStr Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title_short Survival Analysis of Patients with Interval Cancer Undergoing Gastric Cancer Screening by Endoscopy
title_sort survival analysis of patients with interval cancer undergoing gastric cancer screening by endoscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126796
work_keys_str_mv AT hamashimachisato survivalanalysisofpatientswithintervalcancerundergoinggastriccancerscreeningbyendoscopy
AT shabanamichiko survivalanalysisofpatientswithintervalcancerundergoinggastriccancerscreeningbyendoscopy
AT okamotomikizo survivalanalysisofpatientswithintervalcancerundergoinggastriccancerscreeningbyendoscopy
AT osakiyoneatsu survivalanalysisofpatientswithintervalcancerundergoinggastriccancerscreeningbyendoscopy
AT kishimototakuji survivalanalysisofpatientswithintervalcancerundergoinggastriccancerscreeningbyendoscopy