Cargando…

Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center

OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique, Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem, Monsignore, Lucas Moretti, dos Santos, Daniela, Camilo, Millene Rodrigues, Dias, Francisco Antunes, Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles, Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes, Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes, Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette, Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques, Abud, Daniel Giansante
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017648
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05
_version_ 1782373855336071168
author de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique
Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem
Monsignore, Lucas Moretti
dos Santos, Daniela
Camilo, Millene Rodrigues
Dias, Francisco Antunes
Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles
Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes
Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes
Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette
Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques
Abud, Daniel Giansante
author_facet de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique
Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem
Monsignore, Lucas Moretti
dos Santos, Daniela
Camilo, Millene Rodrigues
Dias, Francisco Antunes
Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles
Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes
Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes
Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette
Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques
Abud, Daniel Giansante
author_sort de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had undergone carotid artery stenting as a first-intention treatment. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting by our interventional neuroradiology team was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The secondary endpoints included ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage, ipsilateral transient ischemic attack and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 1- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients were evaluated. The primary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral stroke (2.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.00), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.71). The secondary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral ischemic stroke (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral TIA (0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (11.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, carotid artery stenting was similarly safe and effective when performed as a first-intention treatment in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The study results comply with the safety requirements from current recommendations to perform carotid artery stenting as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44494702015-07-08 Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem Monsignore, Lucas Moretti dos Santos, Daniela Camilo, Millene Rodrigues Dias, Francisco Antunes Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques Abud, Daniel Giansante Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had undergone carotid artery stenting as a first-intention treatment. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting by our interventional neuroradiology team was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The secondary endpoints included ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage, ipsilateral transient ischemic attack and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 1- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients were evaluated. The primary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral stroke (2.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.00), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.71). The secondary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral ischemic stroke (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral TIA (0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (11.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, carotid artery stenting was similarly safe and effective when performed as a first-intention treatment in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The study results comply with the safety requirements from current recommendations to perform carotid artery stenting as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2015-03 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4449470/ /pubmed/26017648 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique
Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem
Monsignore, Lucas Moretti
dos Santos, Daniela
Camilo, Millene Rodrigues
Dias, Francisco Antunes
Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles
Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes
Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes
Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette
Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques
Abud, Daniel Giansante
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title_full Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title_fullStr Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title_short Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
title_sort outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017648
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05
work_keys_str_mv AT decastroafonsoluishenrique outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT nakiriguilhermeseizem outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT monsignorelucasmoretti outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT dossantosdaniela outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT camilomillenerodrigues outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT diasfranciscoantunes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT cougopintopedrotelles outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT barreiraclaramonteiroantunes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT alessioalvesfredericofernandes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT fabiosoraiaramoscabette outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT pontesnetooctaviomarques outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter
AT abuddanielgiansante outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter