Cargando…
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center
OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017648 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05 |
_version_ | 1782373855336071168 |
---|---|
author | de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem Monsignore, Lucas Moretti dos Santos, Daniela Camilo, Millene Rodrigues Dias, Francisco Antunes Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques Abud, Daniel Giansante |
author_facet | de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem Monsignore, Lucas Moretti dos Santos, Daniela Camilo, Millene Rodrigues Dias, Francisco Antunes Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques Abud, Daniel Giansante |
author_sort | de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had undergone carotid artery stenting as a first-intention treatment. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting by our interventional neuroradiology team was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The secondary endpoints included ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage, ipsilateral transient ischemic attack and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 1- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients were evaluated. The primary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral stroke (2.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.00), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.71). The secondary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral ischemic stroke (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral TIA (0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (11.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, carotid artery stenting was similarly safe and effective when performed as a first-intention treatment in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The study results comply with the safety requirements from current recommendations to perform carotid artery stenting as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4449470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44494702015-07-08 Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem Monsignore, Lucas Moretti dos Santos, Daniela Camilo, Millene Rodrigues Dias, Francisco Antunes Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques Abud, Daniel Giansante Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery stenting is an emerging revascularization alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, guidelines have recommended carotid artery stenting only if the rate of periprocedural stroke or death is < 6% among symptomatic patients and < 3% among asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had undergone carotid artery stenting as a first-intention treatment. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting by our interventional neuroradiology team was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. The secondary endpoints included ipsilateral ischemic stroke, ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage, ipsilateral transient ischemic attack and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between the 1- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients were evaluated. The primary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral stroke (2.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.00), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (4.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.71). The secondary endpoints obtained in the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups were ipsilateral ischemic stroke (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage (0.0% vs. 0.0%), ipsilateral TIA (0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.00) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (11.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, carotid artery stenting was similarly safe and effective when performed as a first-intention treatment in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The study results comply with the safety requirements from current recommendations to perform carotid artery stenting as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2015-03 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4449470/ /pubmed/26017648 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science de Castro-Afonso, Luis Henrique Nakiri, Guilherme Seizem Monsignore, Lucas Moretti dos Santos, Daniela Camilo, Millene Rodrigues Dias, Francisco Antunes Cougo-Pinto, Pedro Telles Barreira, Clara Monteiro Antunes Alessio-Alves, Frederico Fernandes Fábio, Soraia Ramos Cabette Pontes-Neto, Octávio Marques Abud, Daniel Giansante Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title | Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title_full | Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title_short | Outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume Brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
title_sort | outcomes of carotid artery stenting at a high-volume brazilian interventional neuroradiology center |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017648 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(03)05 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decastroafonsoluishenrique outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT nakiriguilhermeseizem outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT monsignorelucasmoretti outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT dossantosdaniela outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT camilomillenerodrigues outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT diasfranciscoantunes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT cougopintopedrotelles outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT barreiraclaramonteiroantunes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT alessioalvesfredericofernandes outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT fabiosoraiaramoscabette outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT pontesnetooctaviomarques outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter AT abuddanielgiansante outcomesofcarotidarterystentingatahighvolumebrazilianinterventionalneuroradiologycenter |