Cargando…

Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the Activating Schoolyards Study is to develop, implement, document and assess a comprehensive schoolyard intervention to promote physical activity (PA) during school recess for primary school children (grade 4-8). The intervention is designed to implement organizational and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Henriette Bondo, Pawlowski, Charlotte Skau, Scheller, Hanne Bebendorf, Troelsen, Jens, Toftager, Mette, Schipperijn, Jasper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1828-9
_version_ 1782373866250698752
author Andersen, Henriette Bondo
Pawlowski, Charlotte Skau
Scheller, Hanne Bebendorf
Troelsen, Jens
Toftager, Mette
Schipperijn, Jasper
author_facet Andersen, Henriette Bondo
Pawlowski, Charlotte Skau
Scheller, Hanne Bebendorf
Troelsen, Jens
Toftager, Mette
Schipperijn, Jasper
author_sort Andersen, Henriette Bondo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the Activating Schoolyards Study is to develop, implement, document and assess a comprehensive schoolyard intervention to promote physical activity (PA) during school recess for primary school children (grade 4-8). The intervention is designed to implement organizational and structural changes in the physical environment. METHOD: The study builds on a quasi-experimental study design using a mixed method approach including: 1) an exploratory study aimed at providing input for the developing process; 2) an evaluation of the effect of the interventions using a combination of accelerometer, GPS and GIS; 3) a process evaluation facilitating the intervention development process and identifying barriers and facilitators in the implementation process; 4) a post-intervention end-user evaluation aimed at exploring who uses the schoolyards and how the schoolyards are used. The seven project schools (cases) were selected by means of an open competition and the interventions were developed using a participatory bottom-up approach. DISCUSSION: The participatory approach and case selection strategy make the study design novel. The use of a mixed methods design including qualitative as well as quantitative methods can be seen as a strength, as the different types of data complement each other and results of one part of the study informed the following parts. A unique aspect of our study is the use of accelerometers in combination with GPS and GIS in the effect evaluation to objectively determine where and how active the students are in the schoolyard, before and after the intervention. This provides a type of data that, to our knowledge, has not been used before in schoolyard interventions. Exploring the change in behavior in relation to specific intervention elements in the schoolyard will lead to recommendations for schools undergoing schoolyard renovations at some point in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44495172015-05-31 Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study Andersen, Henriette Bondo Pawlowski, Charlotte Skau Scheller, Hanne Bebendorf Troelsen, Jens Toftager, Mette Schipperijn, Jasper BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The aim of the Activating Schoolyards Study is to develop, implement, document and assess a comprehensive schoolyard intervention to promote physical activity (PA) during school recess for primary school children (grade 4-8). The intervention is designed to implement organizational and structural changes in the physical environment. METHOD: The study builds on a quasi-experimental study design using a mixed method approach including: 1) an exploratory study aimed at providing input for the developing process; 2) an evaluation of the effect of the interventions using a combination of accelerometer, GPS and GIS; 3) a process evaluation facilitating the intervention development process and identifying barriers and facilitators in the implementation process; 4) a post-intervention end-user evaluation aimed at exploring who uses the schoolyards and how the schoolyards are used. The seven project schools (cases) were selected by means of an open competition and the interventions were developed using a participatory bottom-up approach. DISCUSSION: The participatory approach and case selection strategy make the study design novel. The use of a mixed methods design including qualitative as well as quantitative methods can be seen as a strength, as the different types of data complement each other and results of one part of the study informed the following parts. A unique aspect of our study is the use of accelerometers in combination with GPS and GIS in the effect evaluation to objectively determine where and how active the students are in the schoolyard, before and after the intervention. This provides a type of data that, to our knowledge, has not been used before in schoolyard interventions. Exploring the change in behavior in relation to specific intervention elements in the schoolyard will lead to recommendations for schools undergoing schoolyard renovations at some point in the future. BioMed Central 2015-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4449517/ /pubmed/26026650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1828-9 Text en © Andersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Andersen, Henriette Bondo
Pawlowski, Charlotte Skau
Scheller, Hanne Bebendorf
Troelsen, Jens
Toftager, Mette
Schipperijn, Jasper
Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title_full Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title_fullStr Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title_short Activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
title_sort activating schoolyards: study design of a quasi-experimental schoolyard intervention study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1828-9
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenhenriettebondo activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy
AT pawlowskicharlotteskau activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy
AT schellerhannebebendorf activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy
AT troelsenjens activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy
AT toftagermette activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy
AT schipperijnjasper activatingschoolyardsstudydesignofaquasiexperimentalschoolyardinterventionstudy