Cargando…

The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing

Pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their fetus. Therefore, we implemented whole genome microarray instead of conventional karyotyping (CK) for all indications for prenatal diagnosis (PND). The array detects more clinically relevant anomalies, including early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riedijk, Sam, Diderich, Karin E. M., van der Steen, Sanne L., Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P., Joosten, Marieke, Knapen, Maarten F. C. M., de Vries, Femke A. T., van Opstal, Diane, Tibben, Aad, Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030713
_version_ 1782373889449394176
author Riedijk, Sam
Diderich, Karin E. M.
van der Steen, Sanne L.
Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P.
Joosten, Marieke
Knapen, Maarten F. C. M.
de Vries, Femke A. T.
van Opstal, Diane
Tibben, Aad
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
author_facet Riedijk, Sam
Diderich, Karin E. M.
van der Steen, Sanne L.
Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P.
Joosten, Marieke
Knapen, Maarten F. C. M.
de Vries, Femke A. T.
van Opstal, Diane
Tibben, Aad
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
author_sort Riedijk, Sam
collection PubMed
description Pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their fetus. Therefore, we implemented whole genome microarray instead of conventional karyotyping (CK) for all indications for prenatal diagnosis (PND). The array detects more clinically relevant anomalies, including early onset disorders, not related to the indication and more genetic anomalies of yet unquantifiable risk, so-called susceptibility loci (SL) for mainly neurodevelopmental disorders. This manuscript highlights the psychological challenges in prenatal genetic counselling when using the array and provides counselling suggestions. First, we suggest that pre-test decision counselling should emphasize deliberation about what pregnant couples wish to learn about the future health of their fetus more than information about possible outcomes. Second, pregnant couples need support in dealing with SL. Therefore, in order to consider the SL in a proportionate perspective, the presence of phenotypes associated with SL in the family, the incidence of a particular SL in control populations and in postnatally ascertained patients needs highlighting during post-test genetic counselling. Finally, the decision that couples need to make about the course of their pregnancy is more complicated when the expected phenotype is variable and not quantifiable. Therefore, during post-test psychological counseling, couples should concretize the options of continuing and ending their pregnancy; all underlying feelings and thoughts should be made explicit, as well as the couple’s resources, in order to attain adequate decision-making. As such, pre- and post-test counselling aids pregnant couples in handling the uncertainties that may accompany offering a broader scope of genetic PND using the array.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44496352015-07-28 The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing Riedijk, Sam Diderich, Karin E. M. van der Steen, Sanne L. Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P. Joosten, Marieke Knapen, Maarten F. C. M. de Vries, Femke A. T. van Opstal, Diane Tibben, Aad Galjaard, Robert-Jan H. J Clin Med Review Pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their fetus. Therefore, we implemented whole genome microarray instead of conventional karyotyping (CK) for all indications for prenatal diagnosis (PND). The array detects more clinically relevant anomalies, including early onset disorders, not related to the indication and more genetic anomalies of yet unquantifiable risk, so-called susceptibility loci (SL) for mainly neurodevelopmental disorders. This manuscript highlights the psychological challenges in prenatal genetic counselling when using the array and provides counselling suggestions. First, we suggest that pre-test decision counselling should emphasize deliberation about what pregnant couples wish to learn about the future health of their fetus more than information about possible outcomes. Second, pregnant couples need support in dealing with SL. Therefore, in order to consider the SL in a proportionate perspective, the presence of phenotypes associated with SL in the family, the incidence of a particular SL in control populations and in postnatally ascertained patients needs highlighting during post-test genetic counselling. Finally, the decision that couples need to make about the course of their pregnancy is more complicated when the expected phenotype is variable and not quantifiable. Therefore, during post-test psychological counseling, couples should concretize the options of continuing and ending their pregnancy; all underlying feelings and thoughts should be made explicit, as well as the couple’s resources, in order to attain adequate decision-making. As such, pre- and post-test counselling aids pregnant couples in handling the uncertainties that may accompany offering a broader scope of genetic PND using the array. MDPI 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4449635/ /pubmed/26237473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030713 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Riedijk, Sam
Diderich, Karin E. M.
van der Steen, Sanne L.
Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P.
Joosten, Marieke
Knapen, Maarten F. C. M.
de Vries, Femke A. T.
van Opstal, Diane
Tibben, Aad
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title_full The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title_fullStr The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title_full_unstemmed The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title_short The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing
title_sort psychological challenges of replacing conventional karyotyping with genomic snp array analysis in prenatal testing
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030713
work_keys_str_mv AT riedijksam thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT diderichkarinem thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT vandersteensannel thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT govaertslutgardecp thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT joostenmarieke thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT knapenmaartenfcm thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT devriesfemkeat thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT vanopstaldiane thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT tibbenaad thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT galjaardrobertjanh thepsychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT riedijksam psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT diderichkarinem psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT vandersteensannel psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT govaertslutgardecp psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT joostenmarieke psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT knapenmaartenfcm psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT devriesfemkeat psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT vanopstaldiane psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT tibbenaad psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting
AT galjaardrobertjanh psychologicalchallengesofreplacingconventionalkaryotypingwithgenomicsnparrayanalysisinprenataltesting