Cargando…

Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk

Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogilvie, Caroline, Akolekar, Ranjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030741
_version_ 1782373893625872384
author Ogilvie, Caroline
Akolekar, Ranjit
author_facet Ogilvie, Caroline
Akolekar, Ranjit
author_sort Ogilvie, Caroline
collection PubMed
description Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion that accurate and evidence-based information concerning miscarriage risk is vital when counseling women, as exaggeration of this risk may deter women from testing, or cause unjustified remorse if a miscarriage ensues. It is also essential that health-care economists are aware of the up-to-date evidence on “procedure-related risk” when applying risk-benefit analysis to assess new technology for non-invasive screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44496542015-07-28 Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk Ogilvie, Caroline Akolekar, Ranjit J Clin Med Communication Risk of procedure-related pregnancy loss is currently widely quoted in the UK as 1% for amniocentesis and 1.5% for chorionic villus sampling. Published data suggest that these risk figures are out of date and inaccurate, and that new guidelines are required for pre-test counseling. It is our opinion that accurate and evidence-based information concerning miscarriage risk is vital when counseling women, as exaggeration of this risk may deter women from testing, or cause unjustified remorse if a miscarriage ensues. It is also essential that health-care economists are aware of the up-to-date evidence on “procedure-related risk” when applying risk-benefit analysis to assess new technology for non-invasive screening. MDPI 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4449654/ /pubmed/26237475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030741 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Ogilvie, Caroline
Akolekar, Ranjit
Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title_full Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title_fullStr Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title_short Pregnancy Loss Following Amniocentesis or CVS Sampling—Time for a Reassessment of Risk
title_sort pregnancy loss following amniocentesis or cvs sampling—time for a reassessment of risk
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030741
work_keys_str_mv AT ogilviecaroline pregnancylossfollowingamniocentesisorcvssamplingtimeforareassessmentofrisk
AT akolekarranjit pregnancylossfollowingamniocentesisorcvssamplingtimeforareassessmentofrisk