Cargando…
Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenata...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849 |
_version_ | 1782373893846073344 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Forum T. Steinhaus French, Kathryn Osann, Kathryn E. Bocian, Maureen Jones, Marilyn C. Korty, Lauren |
author_facet | Shah, Forum T. Steinhaus French, Kathryn Osann, Kathryn E. Bocian, Maureen Jones, Marilyn C. Korty, Lauren |
author_sort | Shah, Forum T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenatal Screening Program (CPSP) results have the option of diagnostic testing to determine definitively if the fetus has a chromosomal abnormality. Cell-free fetal (cff-) DNA screening for Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 was first offered in 2012, allowing women with positive screens to choose additional screening before diagnostic testing. Cff-DNA sensitivity rates are as high as 99.9% and 99.1%, with false positive rates of 0.4% and 0.1%, for Trisomies 18 and 21, respectively. A retrospective chart review was performed in 2012 on 500 CPSP referrals at the University of California, San Diego Thornton Hospital. Data were collected prior to and after the introduction of cff-DNA. There was a significant increase in the number of participants who chose to pursue additional testing and a decrease in the number of invasive procedures performed after cff-DNA screening was available. We conclude that as fetal aneuploidy screening improves, the number of invasive procedures will continue to decrease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4449655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44496552015-07-28 Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result Shah, Forum T. Steinhaus French, Kathryn Osann, Kathryn E. Bocian, Maureen Jones, Marilyn C. Korty, Lauren J Clin Med Article Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenatal Screening Program (CPSP) results have the option of diagnostic testing to determine definitively if the fetus has a chromosomal abnormality. Cell-free fetal (cff-) DNA screening for Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 was first offered in 2012, allowing women with positive screens to choose additional screening before diagnostic testing. Cff-DNA sensitivity rates are as high as 99.9% and 99.1%, with false positive rates of 0.4% and 0.1%, for Trisomies 18 and 21, respectively. A retrospective chart review was performed in 2012 on 500 CPSP referrals at the University of California, San Diego Thornton Hospital. Data were collected prior to and after the introduction of cff-DNA. There was a significant increase in the number of participants who chose to pursue additional testing and a decrease in the number of invasive procedures performed after cff-DNA screening was available. We conclude that as fetal aneuploidy screening improves, the number of invasive procedures will continue to decrease. MDPI 2014-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4449655/ /pubmed/26237481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shah, Forum T. Steinhaus French, Kathryn Osann, Kathryn E. Bocian, Maureen Jones, Marilyn C. Korty, Lauren Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title | Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title_full | Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title_fullStr | Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title_short | Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result |
title_sort | impact of cell-free fetal dna screening on patients’ choice of invasive procedures after a positive california prenatal screen result |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahforumt impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult AT steinhausfrenchkathryn impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult AT osannkathryne impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult AT bocianmaureen impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult AT jonesmarilync impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult AT kortylauren impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult |