Cargando…

Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result

Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenata...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Forum T., Steinhaus French, Kathryn, Osann, Kathryn E., Bocian, Maureen, Jones, Marilyn C., Korty, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849
_version_ 1782373893846073344
author Shah, Forum T.
Steinhaus French, Kathryn
Osann, Kathryn E.
Bocian, Maureen
Jones, Marilyn C.
Korty, Lauren
author_facet Shah, Forum T.
Steinhaus French, Kathryn
Osann, Kathryn E.
Bocian, Maureen
Jones, Marilyn C.
Korty, Lauren
author_sort Shah, Forum T.
collection PubMed
description Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenatal Screening Program (CPSP) results have the option of diagnostic testing to determine definitively if the fetus has a chromosomal abnormality. Cell-free fetal (cff-) DNA screening for Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 was first offered in 2012, allowing women with positive screens to choose additional screening before diagnostic testing. Cff-DNA sensitivity rates are as high as 99.9% and 99.1%, with false positive rates of 0.4% and 0.1%, for Trisomies 18 and 21, respectively. A retrospective chart review was performed in 2012 on 500 CPSP referrals at the University of California, San Diego Thornton Hospital. Data were collected prior to and after the introduction of cff-DNA. There was a significant increase in the number of participants who chose to pursue additional testing and a decrease in the number of invasive procedures performed after cff-DNA screening was available. We conclude that as fetal aneuploidy screening improves, the number of invasive procedures will continue to decrease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44496552015-07-28 Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result Shah, Forum T. Steinhaus French, Kathryn Osann, Kathryn E. Bocian, Maureen Jones, Marilyn C. Korty, Lauren J Clin Med Article Until recently, maternal serum analyte levels paired with sonographic fetal nuchal translucency measurement was the most accurate prenatal screen available for Trisomies 18 and 21, (91% and 94% detection and false positive rates of 0.31% and 4.5% respectively). Women with positive California Prenatal Screening Program (CPSP) results have the option of diagnostic testing to determine definitively if the fetus has a chromosomal abnormality. Cell-free fetal (cff-) DNA screening for Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 was first offered in 2012, allowing women with positive screens to choose additional screening before diagnostic testing. Cff-DNA sensitivity rates are as high as 99.9% and 99.1%, with false positive rates of 0.4% and 0.1%, for Trisomies 18 and 21, respectively. A retrospective chart review was performed in 2012 on 500 CPSP referrals at the University of California, San Diego Thornton Hospital. Data were collected prior to and after the introduction of cff-DNA. There was a significant increase in the number of participants who chose to pursue additional testing and a decrease in the number of invasive procedures performed after cff-DNA screening was available. We conclude that as fetal aneuploidy screening improves, the number of invasive procedures will continue to decrease. MDPI 2014-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4449655/ /pubmed/26237481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shah, Forum T.
Steinhaus French, Kathryn
Osann, Kathryn E.
Bocian, Maureen
Jones, Marilyn C.
Korty, Lauren
Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title_full Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title_fullStr Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title_short Impact of Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening on Patients’ Choice of Invasive Procedures after a Positive California Prenatal Screen Result
title_sort impact of cell-free fetal dna screening on patients’ choice of invasive procedures after a positive california prenatal screen result
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3030849
work_keys_str_mv AT shahforumt impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult
AT steinhausfrenchkathryn impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult
AT osannkathryne impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult
AT bocianmaureen impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult
AT jonesmarilync impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult
AT kortylauren impactofcellfreefetaldnascreeningonpatientschoiceofinvasiveproceduresafterapositivecaliforniaprenatalscreenresult