Cargando…

It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) offers pregnant women a new risk assessment tool for fetal aneuploidy that is superior to conventional screening tests. We conducted focus groups with women who were currently pregnant or had recently delivered in the past year to characterize their perspectives a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrell, Ruth M., Mercer, Mary Beth, Agatisa, Patricia K., Smith, Marissa B., Philipson, Elliot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3020614
_version_ 1782373899855462400
author Farrell, Ruth M.
Mercer, Mary Beth
Agatisa, Patricia K.
Smith, Marissa B.
Philipson, Elliot
author_facet Farrell, Ruth M.
Mercer, Mary Beth
Agatisa, Patricia K.
Smith, Marissa B.
Philipson, Elliot
author_sort Farrell, Ruth M.
collection PubMed
description Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) offers pregnant women a new risk assessment tool for fetal aneuploidy that is superior to conventional screening tests. We conducted focus groups with women who were currently pregnant or had recently delivered in the past year to characterize their perspectives about NIPT and to explore factors they would consider during decision making about its use. Women identified accuracy, early timing, testing ease, and determination of fetal sex as advantages of NIPT over other screens, and the noninvasive method of NIPT as an advantage over diagnostic tests. False positive and false negative results, anxiety, cost and insurance coverage were seen as disadvantages of NIPT. Women who do not want fetal aneuploidy information most likely will not undergo NIPT, despite its advantages over other screening tests. However, given its advantages, the decision to have NIPT is straightforward for women who want genetic information about the fetus. Women emphasized the need to make autonomous, private, and informed choices about NIPT, as they would with any prenatal genetic testing option. These perspectives may guide clinicians to conduct effective and clinically relevant counseling with pregnant women who consider utilizing this new genetic technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4449684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44496842015-07-28 It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Farrell, Ruth M. Mercer, Mary Beth Agatisa, Patricia K. Smith, Marissa B. Philipson, Elliot J Clin Med Article Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) offers pregnant women a new risk assessment tool for fetal aneuploidy that is superior to conventional screening tests. We conducted focus groups with women who were currently pregnant or had recently delivered in the past year to characterize their perspectives about NIPT and to explore factors they would consider during decision making about its use. Women identified accuracy, early timing, testing ease, and determination of fetal sex as advantages of NIPT over other screens, and the noninvasive method of NIPT as an advantage over diagnostic tests. False positive and false negative results, anxiety, cost and insurance coverage were seen as disadvantages of NIPT. Women who do not want fetal aneuploidy information most likely will not undergo NIPT, despite its advantages over other screening tests. However, given its advantages, the decision to have NIPT is straightforward for women who want genetic information about the fetus. Women emphasized the need to make autonomous, private, and informed choices about NIPT, as they would with any prenatal genetic testing option. These perspectives may guide clinicians to conduct effective and clinically relevant counseling with pregnant women who consider utilizing this new genetic technology. MDPI 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4449684/ /pubmed/26237393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3020614 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farrell, Ruth M.
Mercer, Mary Beth
Agatisa, Patricia K.
Smith, Marissa B.
Philipson, Elliot
It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title_full It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title_fullStr It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title_full_unstemmed It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title_short It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
title_sort it’s more than a blood test: patients’ perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4449684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm3020614
work_keys_str_mv AT farrellruthm itsmorethanabloodtestpatientsperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT mercermarybeth itsmorethanabloodtestpatientsperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT agatisapatriciak itsmorethanabloodtestpatientsperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT smithmarissab itsmorethanabloodtestpatientsperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltesting
AT philipsonelliot itsmorethanabloodtestpatientsperspectivesonnoninvasiveprenataltesting