Cargando…

The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury

BACKGROUND: Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α activator, has shown promising results as a neuroprotective therapy, with proposed anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. However, it displays poor blood-brain barrier permeability leading to some ambiguity over its mechanism of action. Experimentally induced b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Losey, Patrick, Ladds, Emma, Laprais, Maud, Geuvel, Borna, Burns, Laura, Bordet, Regis, Anthony, Daniel C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0295-7
_version_ 1782374007988813824
author Losey, Patrick
Ladds, Emma
Laprais, Maud
Geuvel, Borna
Burns, Laura
Bordet, Regis
Anthony, Daniel C
author_facet Losey, Patrick
Ladds, Emma
Laprais, Maud
Geuvel, Borna
Burns, Laura
Bordet, Regis
Anthony, Daniel C
author_sort Losey, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α activator, has shown promising results as a neuroprotective therapy, with proposed anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. However, it displays poor blood-brain barrier permeability leading to some ambiguity over its mechanism of action. Experimentally induced brain injury has been shown to elicit a hepatic acute phase response that modulates leukocyte recruitment to the injured brain. Here, we sought to discover whether one effect of fenofibrate might include the suppression of the acute phase response (APR) following brain injury. METHODS: A 1-h intraluminal thread middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model followed by a 6-h reperfusion was performed in C57/BL6 mice. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was then used to measure hepatic expression of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and serum amyloid A-1 (SAA-1), and immunohistochemical analysis was used to quantify brain and hepatic neutrophil infiltration following stroke. RESULTS: The MCAO and sham surgery induced the expression of all three acute phase reactants. A 14-day fenofibrate pre-treatment decreased reactant production, infarct volume, and neutrophil recruitment to the brain and liver, which is a hallmark of the APR. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight a novel mechanism of action for fenofibrate and lend further evidence towards the promotion of its use as a prophylactic therapy in patients at risk of cerebral ischaemia. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanistic explanation underlying its actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4450490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44504902015-06-02 The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury Losey, Patrick Ladds, Emma Laprais, Maud Geuvel, Borna Burns, Laura Bordet, Regis Anthony, Daniel C J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α activator, has shown promising results as a neuroprotective therapy, with proposed anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects. However, it displays poor blood-brain barrier permeability leading to some ambiguity over its mechanism of action. Experimentally induced brain injury has been shown to elicit a hepatic acute phase response that modulates leukocyte recruitment to the injured brain. Here, we sought to discover whether one effect of fenofibrate might include the suppression of the acute phase response (APR) following brain injury. METHODS: A 1-h intraluminal thread middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model followed by a 6-h reperfusion was performed in C57/BL6 mice. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was then used to measure hepatic expression of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and serum amyloid A-1 (SAA-1), and immunohistochemical analysis was used to quantify brain and hepatic neutrophil infiltration following stroke. RESULTS: The MCAO and sham surgery induced the expression of all three acute phase reactants. A 14-day fenofibrate pre-treatment decreased reactant production, infarct volume, and neutrophil recruitment to the brain and liver, which is a hallmark of the APR. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight a novel mechanism of action for fenofibrate and lend further evidence towards the promotion of its use as a prophylactic therapy in patients at risk of cerebral ischaemia. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanistic explanation underlying its actions. BioMed Central 2015-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4450490/ /pubmed/25994490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0295-7 Text en © Losey et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Losey, Patrick
Ladds, Emma
Laprais, Maud
Geuvel, Borna
Burns, Laura
Bordet, Regis
Anthony, Daniel C
The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title_full The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title_fullStr The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title_full_unstemmed The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title_short The role of PPAR activation during the systemic response to brain injury
title_sort role of ppar activation during the systemic response to brain injury
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0295-7
work_keys_str_mv AT loseypatrick theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT laddsemma theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT lapraismaud theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT geuvelborna theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT burnslaura theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT bordetregis theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT anthonydanielc theroleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT loseypatrick roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT laddsemma roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT lapraismaud roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT geuvelborna roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT burnslaura roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT bordetregis roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury
AT anthonydanielc roleofpparactivationduringthesystemicresponsetobraininjury