Cargando…

Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient’s own wishes, the surgeon’s core medical values, exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandell, Eva, Berg, Maria, Sandblom, Gabriel, Sundman, Joar, Fränneby, Ulf, Boström, Lennart, Andrén-Sandberg, Åke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26032861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
_version_ 1782374059357503488
author Sandell, Eva
Berg, Maria
Sandblom, Gabriel
Sundman, Joar
Fränneby, Ulf
Boström, Lennart
Andrén-Sandberg, Åke
author_facet Sandell, Eva
Berg, Maria
Sandblom, Gabriel
Sundman, Joar
Fränneby, Ulf
Boström, Lennart
Andrén-Sandberg, Åke
author_sort Sandell, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient’s own wishes, the surgeon’s core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than “soft” clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. METHODS: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three- month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Södersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. RESULTS: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. CONCLUSION: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4450839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44508392015-06-02 Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis Sandell, Eva Berg, Maria Sandblom, Gabriel Sundman, Joar Fränneby, Ulf Boström, Lennart Andrén-Sandberg, Åke BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient’s own wishes, the surgeon’s core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than “soft” clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. METHODS: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three- month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Södersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. RESULTS: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. CONCLUSION: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision. BioMed Central 2015-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4450839/ /pubmed/26032861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x Text en © Sandell et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandell, Eva
Berg, Maria
Sandblom, Gabriel
Sundman, Joar
Fränneby, Ulf
Boström, Lennart
Andrén-Sandberg, Åke
Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title_full Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title_fullStr Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title_short Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
title_sort surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26032861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sandelleva surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT bergmaria surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT sandblomgabriel surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT sundmanjoar surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT frannebyulf surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT bostromlennart surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis
AT andrensandbergake surgicaldecisionmakinginacuteappendicitis