Cargando…
Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Accurate and timely diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with confusion. Clinical manifestations, imaging techniques, biomarkers and surgical techniques are used as diagnostic approaches. This paper reviews current evidence on clinical manifestation in order to help practitioners and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25952159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0196-z |
_version_ | 1782374061240745984 |
---|---|
author | Riazi, Hedyeh Tehranian, Najmeh Ziaei, Saeideh Mohammadi, Easa Hajizadeh, Ebrahim Montazeri, Ali |
author_facet | Riazi, Hedyeh Tehranian, Najmeh Ziaei, Saeideh Mohammadi, Easa Hajizadeh, Ebrahim Montazeri, Ali |
author_sort | Riazi, Hedyeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate and timely diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with confusion. Clinical manifestations, imaging techniques, biomarkers and surgical techniques are used as diagnostic approaches. This paper reviews current evidence on clinical manifestation in order to help practitioners and perhaps improve women’s health. METHODS: A review of the literature on clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis that appeared in the English language biomedical journals was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The search strategy included the combination of key words ‘endometriosis’ and ‘diagnosis’ or ‘clinical diagnosis’ in the titles or abstracts of articles. The search included all papers published during the year 2000 to 2014. Then, the findings were classified in order to summarize the evidence. RESULTS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, in all 51 papers were found relevant and included in this review. In general we found three categories of diagnostic approaches for clinical manifestation including: i) diagnosis via symptoms obtained from history taking, ii) diagnosis via signs obtained from physical examination and iii) diagnosis via risk factors obtained from history taking. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of endometriosis is a matter of concern. Since the disease is associated with diverse clinical symptoms and signs, deeper and more comprehensive consideration according to patient’s history and clinical findings is recommended for early and more accurate detection in order to prioritize women for further investigation and contribute to its early management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4450847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44508472015-06-02 Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review Riazi, Hedyeh Tehranian, Najmeh Ziaei, Saeideh Mohammadi, Easa Hajizadeh, Ebrahim Montazeri, Ali BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate and timely diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with confusion. Clinical manifestations, imaging techniques, biomarkers and surgical techniques are used as diagnostic approaches. This paper reviews current evidence on clinical manifestation in order to help practitioners and perhaps improve women’s health. METHODS: A review of the literature on clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis that appeared in the English language biomedical journals was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The search strategy included the combination of key words ‘endometriosis’ and ‘diagnosis’ or ‘clinical diagnosis’ in the titles or abstracts of articles. The search included all papers published during the year 2000 to 2014. Then, the findings were classified in order to summarize the evidence. RESULTS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, in all 51 papers were found relevant and included in this review. In general we found three categories of diagnostic approaches for clinical manifestation including: i) diagnosis via symptoms obtained from history taking, ii) diagnosis via signs obtained from physical examination and iii) diagnosis via risk factors obtained from history taking. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of endometriosis is a matter of concern. Since the disease is associated with diverse clinical symptoms and signs, deeper and more comprehensive consideration according to patient’s history and clinical findings is recommended for early and more accurate detection in order to prioritize women for further investigation and contribute to its early management. BioMed Central 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4450847/ /pubmed/25952159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0196-z Text en © Riazi et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Riazi, Hedyeh Tehranian, Najmeh Ziaei, Saeideh Mohammadi, Easa Hajizadeh, Ebrahim Montazeri, Ali Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title | Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title_full | Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title_short | Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
title_sort | clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25952159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0196-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riazihedyeh clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview AT tehraniannajmeh clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview AT ziaeisaeideh clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview AT mohammadieasa clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview AT hajizadehebrahim clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview AT montazeriali clinicaldiagnosisofpelvicendometriosisascopingreview |