Cargando…

For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases

Background. Open access (OA) journals allows access to research papers free of charge to the reader. Traditionally, biomedical researchers use databases like MEDLINE and EMBASE to discover new advances. However, biomedical OA journals might not fulfill such databases’ criteria, hindering disseminati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liljekvist, Mads Svane, Andresen, Kristoffer, Pommergaard, Hans-Christian, Rosenberg, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.972
_version_ 1782374090647011328
author Liljekvist, Mads Svane
Andresen, Kristoffer
Pommergaard, Hans-Christian
Rosenberg, Jacob
author_facet Liljekvist, Mads Svane
Andresen, Kristoffer
Pommergaard, Hans-Christian
Rosenberg, Jacob
author_sort Liljekvist, Mads Svane
collection PubMed
description Background. Open access (OA) journals allows access to research papers free of charge to the reader. Traditionally, biomedical researchers use databases like MEDLINE and EMBASE to discover new advances. However, biomedical OA journals might not fulfill such databases’ criteria, hindering dissemination. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is a database exclusively listing OA journals. The aim of this study was to investigate DOAJ’s coverage of biomedical OA journals compared with the conventional biomedical databases. Methods. Information on all journals listed in four conventional biomedical databases (MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE and SCOPUS) and DOAJ were gathered. Journals were included if they were (1) actively publishing, (2) full OA, (3) prospectively indexed in one or more database, and (4) of biomedical subject. Impact factor and journal language were also collected. DOAJ was compared with conventional databases regarding the proportion of journals covered, along with their impact factor and publishing language. The proportion of journals with articles indexed by DOAJ was determined. Results. In total, 3,236 biomedical OA journals were included in the study. Of the included journals, 86.7% were listed in DOAJ. Combined, the conventional biomedical databases listed 75.0% of the journals; 18.7% in MEDLINE; 36.5% in PubMed Central; 51.5% in SCOPUS and 50.6% in EMBASE. Of the journals in DOAJ, 88.7% published in English and 20.6% had received impact factor for 2012 compared with 93.5% and 26.0%, respectively, for journals in the conventional biomedical databases. A subset of 51.1% and 48.5% of the journals in DOAJ had articles indexed from 2012 and 2013, respectively. Of journals exclusively listed in DOAJ, one journal had received an impact factor for 2012, and 59.6% of the journals had no content from 2013 indexed in DOAJ. Conclusions. DOAJ is the most complete registry of biomedical OA journals compared with five conventional biomedical databases. However, DOAJ only indexes articles for half of the biomedical journals listed, making it an incomplete source for biomedical research papers in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44510412015-06-02 For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases Liljekvist, Mads Svane Andresen, Kristoffer Pommergaard, Hans-Christian Rosenberg, Jacob PeerJ Science and Medical Education Background. Open access (OA) journals allows access to research papers free of charge to the reader. Traditionally, biomedical researchers use databases like MEDLINE and EMBASE to discover new advances. However, biomedical OA journals might not fulfill such databases’ criteria, hindering dissemination. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is a database exclusively listing OA journals. The aim of this study was to investigate DOAJ’s coverage of biomedical OA journals compared with the conventional biomedical databases. Methods. Information on all journals listed in four conventional biomedical databases (MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE and SCOPUS) and DOAJ were gathered. Journals were included if they were (1) actively publishing, (2) full OA, (3) prospectively indexed in one or more database, and (4) of biomedical subject. Impact factor and journal language were also collected. DOAJ was compared with conventional databases regarding the proportion of journals covered, along with their impact factor and publishing language. The proportion of journals with articles indexed by DOAJ was determined. Results. In total, 3,236 biomedical OA journals were included in the study. Of the included journals, 86.7% were listed in DOAJ. Combined, the conventional biomedical databases listed 75.0% of the journals; 18.7% in MEDLINE; 36.5% in PubMed Central; 51.5% in SCOPUS and 50.6% in EMBASE. Of the journals in DOAJ, 88.7% published in English and 20.6% had received impact factor for 2012 compared with 93.5% and 26.0%, respectively, for journals in the conventional biomedical databases. A subset of 51.1% and 48.5% of the journals in DOAJ had articles indexed from 2012 and 2013, respectively. Of journals exclusively listed in DOAJ, one journal had received an impact factor for 2012, and 59.6% of the journals had no content from 2013 indexed in DOAJ. Conclusions. DOAJ is the most complete registry of biomedical OA journals compared with five conventional biomedical databases. However, DOAJ only indexes articles for half of the biomedical journals listed, making it an incomplete source for biomedical research papers in general. PeerJ Inc. 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4451041/ /pubmed/26038727 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.972 Text en © 2015 Liljekvist et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Science and Medical Education
Liljekvist, Mads Svane
Andresen, Kristoffer
Pommergaard, Hans-Christian
Rosenberg, Jacob
For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title_full For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title_fullStr For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title_full_unstemmed For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title_short For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
title_sort for 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the directory of open access journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
topic Science and Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038727
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.972
work_keys_str_mv AT liljekvistmadssvane for481biomedicalopenaccessjournalsarticlesarenotsearchableinthedirectoryofopenaccessjournalsnorinconventionalbiomedicaldatabases
AT andresenkristoffer for481biomedicalopenaccessjournalsarticlesarenotsearchableinthedirectoryofopenaccessjournalsnorinconventionalbiomedicaldatabases
AT pommergaardhanschristian for481biomedicalopenaccessjournalsarticlesarenotsearchableinthedirectoryofopenaccessjournalsnorinconventionalbiomedicaldatabases
AT rosenbergjacob for481biomedicalopenaccessjournalsarticlesarenotsearchableinthedirectoryofopenaccessjournalsnorinconventionalbiomedicaldatabases