Cargando…

Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients

Behavioral and EEG studies suggest spatial attention is allocated as a gradient in which processing benefits decrease away from an attended location. Yet the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical processes that contribute to attentional gradients are unclear. We measured EEG while participants (n = 35...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mock, Jeffrey R., Seay, Michael J., Charney, Danielle R., Holmes, John L., Golob, Edward J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00179
_version_ 1782374124878823424
author Mock, Jeffrey R.
Seay, Michael J.
Charney, Danielle R.
Holmes, John L.
Golob, Edward J.
author_facet Mock, Jeffrey R.
Seay, Michael J.
Charney, Danielle R.
Holmes, John L.
Golob, Edward J.
author_sort Mock, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description Behavioral and EEG studies suggest spatial attention is allocated as a gradient in which processing benefits decrease away from an attended location. Yet the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical processes that contribute to attentional gradients are unclear. We measured EEG while participants (n = 35) performed an auditory spatial attention task that required a button press to sounds at one target location on either the left or right. Distractor sounds were randomly presented at four non-target locations evenly spaced up to 180° from the target location. Attentional gradients were quantified by regressing ERP amplitudes elicited by distractors against their spatial location relative to the target. Independent component analysis was applied to each subject's scalp channel data, allowing isolation of distinct cortical sources. Results from scalp ERPs showed a tri-phasic response with gradient slope peaks at ~300 ms (frontal, positive), ~430 ms (posterior, negative), and a plateau starting at ~550 ms (frontal, positive). Corresponding to the first slope peak, a positive gradient was found within a central component when attending to both target locations and for two lateral frontal components when contralateral to the target location. Similarly, a central posterior component had a negative gradient that corresponded to the second slope peak regardless of target location. A right posterior component had both an ipsilateral followed by a contralateral gradient. Lateral posterior clusters also had decreases in α and β oscillatory power with a negative slope and contralateral tuning. Only the left posterior component (120–200 ms) corresponded to absolute sound location. The findings indicate a rapid, temporally-organized sequence of gradients thought to reflect interplay between frontal and parietal regions. We conclude these gradients support a target-based saliency map exhibiting aspects of both right-hemisphere dominance and opponent process models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44513432015-06-16 Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients Mock, Jeffrey R. Seay, Michael J. Charney, Danielle R. Holmes, John L. Golob, Edward J. Front Neurosci Psychology Behavioral and EEG studies suggest spatial attention is allocated as a gradient in which processing benefits decrease away from an attended location. Yet the spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical processes that contribute to attentional gradients are unclear. We measured EEG while participants (n = 35) performed an auditory spatial attention task that required a button press to sounds at one target location on either the left or right. Distractor sounds were randomly presented at four non-target locations evenly spaced up to 180° from the target location. Attentional gradients were quantified by regressing ERP amplitudes elicited by distractors against their spatial location relative to the target. Independent component analysis was applied to each subject's scalp channel data, allowing isolation of distinct cortical sources. Results from scalp ERPs showed a tri-phasic response with gradient slope peaks at ~300 ms (frontal, positive), ~430 ms (posterior, negative), and a plateau starting at ~550 ms (frontal, positive). Corresponding to the first slope peak, a positive gradient was found within a central component when attending to both target locations and for two lateral frontal components when contralateral to the target location. Similarly, a central posterior component had a negative gradient that corresponded to the second slope peak regardless of target location. A right posterior component had both an ipsilateral followed by a contralateral gradient. Lateral posterior clusters also had decreases in α and β oscillatory power with a negative slope and contralateral tuning. Only the left posterior component (120–200 ms) corresponded to absolute sound location. The findings indicate a rapid, temporally-organized sequence of gradients thought to reflect interplay between frontal and parietal regions. We conclude these gradients support a target-based saliency map exhibiting aspects of both right-hemisphere dominance and opponent process models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4451343/ /pubmed/26082679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00179 Text en Copyright © 2015 Mock, Seay, Charney, Holmes and Golob. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mock, Jeffrey R.
Seay, Michael J.
Charney, Danielle R.
Holmes, John L.
Golob, Edward J.
Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title_full Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title_fullStr Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title_full_unstemmed Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title_short Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
title_sort rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00179
work_keys_str_mv AT mockjeffreyr rapidcorticaldynamicsassociatedwithauditoryspatialattentiongradients
AT seaymichaelj rapidcorticaldynamicsassociatedwithauditoryspatialattentiongradients
AT charneydanieller rapidcorticaldynamicsassociatedwithauditoryspatialattentiongradients
AT holmesjohnl rapidcorticaldynamicsassociatedwithauditoryspatialattentiongradients
AT golobedwardj rapidcorticaldynamicsassociatedwithauditoryspatialattentiongradients