Cargando…

A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study

OBJECTIVES: Cefditoren pivoxil (CDT) has been used in the treatment of rhinosinusitis. However, little is known about the efficacy of this drug at low and high doses. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of low dose (8-12 mg/kg/day) and high dose (16-20 mg/kg/day) CDT in the treatment o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poachanukoon, Orapan, Tangsathapornpong, Auchara, Tanuchit, Sermkiat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26045911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.129
_version_ 1782374152092516352
author Poachanukoon, Orapan
Tangsathapornpong, Auchara
Tanuchit, Sermkiat
author_facet Poachanukoon, Orapan
Tangsathapornpong, Auchara
Tanuchit, Sermkiat
author_sort Poachanukoon, Orapan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cefditoren pivoxil (CDT) has been used in the treatment of rhinosinusitis. However, little is known about the efficacy of this drug at low and high doses. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of low dose (8-12 mg/kg/day) and high dose (16-20 mg/kg/day) CDT in the treatment of children with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). METHODS: This investigation was a randomized, investigator-blinded, and parallel study, conducted in patients (aged 1-15 years) with a clinical diagnosis of uncomplicated ARS. Two groups of patients randomly received low dose or high dose CDT for 14 days. Patients' symptoms were assessed quantitatively using a quantitative symptom score (the S5 score). The changes in sinus symptoms and adverse events were provided by patients and their parents/caregivers. The response rate and adverse effects were evaluated at days 7 and 14. The relapse rate was recorded at days 21 and 28. The recurrences of sinus symptoms at day 60 were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were recruited and randomized; 72 received low dose CDT (group I) and 68 received high dose CDT (group II). There were no significant differences in demographic data including sex, age, presenting symptoms, medical history, and X-ray findings between two groups. The responses rate at day 14 in groups I and II were 95.5% and 95.4%, respectively (P>0.99). There were no significant differences between groups in relapse rate at day 28 and no recurrence at day 60 in either group. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (4.2% in group I vs. 2.9% in group II) and vomiting (2.8% in group I vs. 10.3% in group II). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between groups. CONCLUSION: Both low and high doses regimens of CDT appeared a similar clinical outcome for treatment in uncomplicated ARS in pediatric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44515372015-06-04 A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study Poachanukoon, Orapan Tangsathapornpong, Auchara Tanuchit, Sermkiat Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Cefditoren pivoxil (CDT) has been used in the treatment of rhinosinusitis. However, little is known about the efficacy of this drug at low and high doses. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of low dose (8-12 mg/kg/day) and high dose (16-20 mg/kg/day) CDT in the treatment of children with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). METHODS: This investigation was a randomized, investigator-blinded, and parallel study, conducted in patients (aged 1-15 years) with a clinical diagnosis of uncomplicated ARS. Two groups of patients randomly received low dose or high dose CDT for 14 days. Patients' symptoms were assessed quantitatively using a quantitative symptom score (the S5 score). The changes in sinus symptoms and adverse events were provided by patients and their parents/caregivers. The response rate and adverse effects were evaluated at days 7 and 14. The relapse rate was recorded at days 21 and 28. The recurrences of sinus symptoms at day 60 were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were recruited and randomized; 72 received low dose CDT (group I) and 68 received high dose CDT (group II). There were no significant differences in demographic data including sex, age, presenting symptoms, medical history, and X-ray findings between two groups. The responses rate at day 14 in groups I and II were 95.5% and 95.4%, respectively (P>0.99). There were no significant differences between groups in relapse rate at day 28 and no recurrence at day 60 in either group. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (4.2% in group I vs. 2.9% in group II) and vomiting (2.8% in group I vs. 10.3% in group II). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between groups. CONCLUSION: Both low and high doses regimens of CDT appeared a similar clinical outcome for treatment in uncomplicated ARS in pediatric patients. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2015-06 2015-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4451537/ /pubmed/26045911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.129 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Poachanukoon, Orapan
Tangsathapornpong, Auchara
Tanuchit, Sermkiat
A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title_full A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title_short A Comparison of Cefditoren Pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and Cefditoren Pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in Treatment of Children With Acute Presumed Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-Blinded, Parallel-Group Study
title_sort comparison of cefditoren pivoxil 8-12 mg/kg/day and cefditoren pivoxil 16-20 mg/kg/day in treatment of children with acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel-group study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26045911
http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.129
work_keys_str_mv AT poachanukoonorapan acomparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy
AT tangsathapornpongauchara acomparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy
AT tanuchitsermkiat acomparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy
AT poachanukoonorapan comparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy
AT tangsathapornpongauchara comparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy
AT tanuchitsermkiat comparisonofcefditorenpivoxil812mgkgdayandcefditorenpivoxil1620mgkgdayintreatmentofchildrenwithacutepresumedbacterialrhinosinusitisaprospectiverandomizedinvestigatorblindedparallelgroupstudy