Cargando…

Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in brief and very brief behaviour change interventions for physical activity as they are potentially scalable to the population level. However, few very brief interventions (VBIs) have been published, and evidence is lacking about their feasibility, acceptabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pears, Sally, Morton, Katie, Bijker, Maaike, Sutton, Stephen, Hardeman, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8
_version_ 1782374182434111488
author Pears, Sally
Morton, Katie
Bijker, Maaike
Sutton, Stephen
Hardeman, Wendy
author_facet Pears, Sally
Morton, Katie
Bijker, Maaike
Sutton, Stephen
Hardeman, Wendy
author_sort Pears, Sally
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in brief and very brief behaviour change interventions for physical activity as they are potentially scalable to the population level. However, few very brief interventions (VBIs) have been published, and evidence is lacking about their feasibility, acceptability and which ‘active ingredients’ (behaviour change techniques) would maximise their effectiveness. The aim of this research was to identify and develop promising VBIs for physical activity and test their feasibility and acceptability in the context of preventive health checks in primary care. METHODS: The process included two stages, guided by four criteria: effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and cost. In Stage 1, we used an iterative approach informed by systematic reviews, a scoping review of BCTs, team discussion, stakeholder consultation, a qualitative study, and cost estimation to guide the development of promising VBIs. In Stage 2, a feasibility study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the short-listed VBIs, using tape-recordings and interviews with practitioners (n = 4) and patients (n = 68), to decide which VBIs merited further evaluation in a pilot trial. RESULTS: Four VBIs were short-listed: Motivational intervention; Action Planning intervention; Pedometer intervention; and Physical Activity Diary intervention. All were deliverable in around five minutes and were feasible and acceptable to participants and practitioners. Based on the results of interviews with practitioners and patients, techniques from the VBIs were combined into three new VBIs for further evaluation in a pilot trial. CONCLUSIONS: Using a two-stage approach, in which we considered the practicability of VBIs (acceptability, feasibility and cost) alongside potential efficacy from the outset, we developed a short-list of four promising VBIs for physical activity and demonstrated that they were acceptable and feasible as part of a preventive health check in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02863077. Registered 5 October 2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44517192015-06-03 Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care Pears, Sally Morton, Katie Bijker, Maaike Sutton, Stephen Hardeman, Wendy BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in brief and very brief behaviour change interventions for physical activity as they are potentially scalable to the population level. However, few very brief interventions (VBIs) have been published, and evidence is lacking about their feasibility, acceptability and which ‘active ingredients’ (behaviour change techniques) would maximise their effectiveness. The aim of this research was to identify and develop promising VBIs for physical activity and test their feasibility and acceptability in the context of preventive health checks in primary care. METHODS: The process included two stages, guided by four criteria: effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and cost. In Stage 1, we used an iterative approach informed by systematic reviews, a scoping review of BCTs, team discussion, stakeholder consultation, a qualitative study, and cost estimation to guide the development of promising VBIs. In Stage 2, a feasibility study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the short-listed VBIs, using tape-recordings and interviews with practitioners (n = 4) and patients (n = 68), to decide which VBIs merited further evaluation in a pilot trial. RESULTS: Four VBIs were short-listed: Motivational intervention; Action Planning intervention; Pedometer intervention; and Physical Activity Diary intervention. All were deliverable in around five minutes and were feasible and acceptable to participants and practitioners. Based on the results of interviews with practitioners and patients, techniques from the VBIs were combined into three new VBIs for further evaluation in a pilot trial. CONCLUSIONS: Using a two-stage approach, in which we considered the practicability of VBIs (acceptability, feasibility and cost) alongside potential efficacy from the outset, we developed a short-list of four promising VBIs for physical activity and demonstrated that they were acceptable and feasible as part of a preventive health check in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02863077. Registered 5 October 2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4451719/ /pubmed/25887643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8 Text en © Pears et al. 2015
spellingShingle Research Article
Pears, Sally
Morton, Katie
Bijker, Maaike
Sutton, Stephen
Hardeman, Wendy
Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title_full Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title_fullStr Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title_short Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
title_sort development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pearssally developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare
AT mortonkatie developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare
AT bijkermaaike developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare
AT suttonstephen developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare
AT hardemanwendy developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare
AT developmentandfeasibilitystudyofverybriefinterventionsforphysicalactivityinprimarycare