Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women

We explored potential cost-effectiveness of a chlamydia vaccine for young women in the United States by using a compartmental heterosexual transmission model. We tracked health outcomes (acute infections and sequelae measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and determined incremental cost-ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owusu-Edusei, Kwame, Chesson, Harrell W., Gift, Thomas L., Brunham, Robert C., Bolan, Gail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2106.141270
_version_ 1782374212761026560
author Owusu-Edusei, Kwame
Chesson, Harrell W.
Gift, Thomas L.
Brunham, Robert C.
Bolan, Gail
author_facet Owusu-Edusei, Kwame
Chesson, Harrell W.
Gift, Thomas L.
Brunham, Robert C.
Bolan, Gail
author_sort Owusu-Edusei, Kwame
collection PubMed
description We explored potential cost-effectiveness of a chlamydia vaccine for young women in the United States by using a compartmental heterosexual transmission model. We tracked health outcomes (acute infections and sequelae measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and determined incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over a 50-year analytic horizon. We assessed vaccination of 14-year-old girls and catch-up vaccination for 15–24-year-old women in the context of an existing chlamydia screening program and assumed 2 prevaccination prevalences of 3.2% by main analysis and 3.7% by additional analysis. Estimated ICERs of vaccinating 14-year-old girls were $35,300/QALY by main analysis and $16,200/QALY by additional analysis compared with only screening. Catch-up vaccination for 15–24-year-old women resulted in estimated ICERs of $53,200/QALY by main analysis and $26,300/QALY by additional analysis. The ICER was most sensitive to prevaccination prevalence for women, followed by cost of vaccination, duration of vaccine-conferred immunity, and vaccine efficacy. Our results suggest that a successful chlamydia vaccine could be cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44518852015-06-09 Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women Owusu-Edusei, Kwame Chesson, Harrell W. Gift, Thomas L. Brunham, Robert C. Bolan, Gail Emerg Infect Dis Research We explored potential cost-effectiveness of a chlamydia vaccine for young women in the United States by using a compartmental heterosexual transmission model. We tracked health outcomes (acute infections and sequelae measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and determined incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over a 50-year analytic horizon. We assessed vaccination of 14-year-old girls and catch-up vaccination for 15–24-year-old women in the context of an existing chlamydia screening program and assumed 2 prevaccination prevalences of 3.2% by main analysis and 3.7% by additional analysis. Estimated ICERs of vaccinating 14-year-old girls were $35,300/QALY by main analysis and $16,200/QALY by additional analysis compared with only screening. Catch-up vaccination for 15–24-year-old women resulted in estimated ICERs of $53,200/QALY by main analysis and $26,300/QALY by additional analysis. The ICER was most sensitive to prevaccination prevalence for women, followed by cost of vaccination, duration of vaccine-conferred immunity, and vaccine efficacy. Our results suggest that a successful chlamydia vaccine could be cost-effective. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4451885/ /pubmed/25989525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2106.141270 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Owusu-Edusei, Kwame
Chesson, Harrell W.
Gift, Thomas L.
Brunham, Robert C.
Bolan, Gail
Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia Vaccination Programs for Young Women
title_sort cost-effectiveness of chlamydia vaccination programs for young women
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2106.141270
work_keys_str_mv AT owusueduseikwame costeffectivenessofchlamydiavaccinationprogramsforyoungwomen
AT chessonharrellw costeffectivenessofchlamydiavaccinationprogramsforyoungwomen
AT giftthomasl costeffectivenessofchlamydiavaccinationprogramsforyoungwomen
AT brunhamrobertc costeffectivenessofchlamydiavaccinationprogramsforyoungwomen
AT bolangail costeffectivenessofchlamydiavaccinationprogramsforyoungwomen