Cargando…

Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity

Using a strict subject selection procedure, we tested in High and Low Hypnotizable subjects (HHs and LHs) whether treatments of hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia, as compared to a relaxation-control, differentially affected subjective pain ratings and somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Pascalis, Vilfredo, Varriale, Vincenzo, Cacace, Immacolata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128474
_version_ 1782374273053097984
author De Pascalis, Vilfredo
Varriale, Vincenzo
Cacace, Immacolata
author_facet De Pascalis, Vilfredo
Varriale, Vincenzo
Cacace, Immacolata
author_sort De Pascalis, Vilfredo
collection PubMed
description Using a strict subject selection procedure, we tested in High and Low Hypnotizable subjects (HHs and LHs) whether treatments of hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia, as compared to a relaxation-control, differentially affected subjective pain ratings and somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) during painful electric stimulation. Treatments were administered in waking and hypnosis conditions. LHs showed little differentiation in pain and distress ratings between hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia treatments, whereas HHs showed a greater spread in the instructed direction. HHs had larger prefrontal N140 and P200 waves of the SERPs during hypnotic hyperalgesia as compared to relaxation-control treatment. Importantly, HHs showed significant smaller frontocentral N140 and frontotemporal P200 waves during hypnotic hypoalgesia. LHs did not show significant differences for these SERP waves among treatments in both waking and hypnosis conditions. Source localization (sLORETA) method revealed significant activations of the bilateral primary somatosensory (BA3), middle frontal gyrus (BA6) and anterior cingulate cortices (BA24). Activity of these contralateral regions significantly correlated with subjective numerical pain scores for control treatment in waking condition. Moreover, multivariate regression analyses distinguished the contralateral BA3 as the only region reflecting a stable pattern of pain coding changes across all treatments in waking and hypnosis conditions. More direct testing showed that hypnosis reduced the strength of the association of pain modulation and brain activity changes at BA3. sLORETA in HHs revealed, for the N140 wave, that during hypnotic hyperalgesia, there was an increased activity within medial, supramarginal and superior frontal gyri, and cingulated gyrus (BA32), while for the P200 wave, activity was increased in the superior (BA22), middle (BA37), inferior temporal (BA19) gyri and superior parietal lobule (BA7). Hypnotic hypoalgesia in HHs, for N140 wave, showed reduced activity within medial and superior frontal gyri (BA9,8), paraippocampal gyrus (BA34), and postcentral gyrus (BA1), while for the P200, activity was reduced within middle and superior frontal gyri (BA9 and BA10), anterior cingulate (BA33), cuneus (BA19) and sub-lobar insula (BA13). These findings demonstrate that hypnotic suggestions can exert a top-down modulatory effect on attention/preconscious brain processes involved in pain perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4452240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44522402015-06-09 Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity De Pascalis, Vilfredo Varriale, Vincenzo Cacace, Immacolata PLoS One Research Article Using a strict subject selection procedure, we tested in High and Low Hypnotizable subjects (HHs and LHs) whether treatments of hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia, as compared to a relaxation-control, differentially affected subjective pain ratings and somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) during painful electric stimulation. Treatments were administered in waking and hypnosis conditions. LHs showed little differentiation in pain and distress ratings between hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia treatments, whereas HHs showed a greater spread in the instructed direction. HHs had larger prefrontal N140 and P200 waves of the SERPs during hypnotic hyperalgesia as compared to relaxation-control treatment. Importantly, HHs showed significant smaller frontocentral N140 and frontotemporal P200 waves during hypnotic hypoalgesia. LHs did not show significant differences for these SERP waves among treatments in both waking and hypnosis conditions. Source localization (sLORETA) method revealed significant activations of the bilateral primary somatosensory (BA3), middle frontal gyrus (BA6) and anterior cingulate cortices (BA24). Activity of these contralateral regions significantly correlated with subjective numerical pain scores for control treatment in waking condition. Moreover, multivariate regression analyses distinguished the contralateral BA3 as the only region reflecting a stable pattern of pain coding changes across all treatments in waking and hypnosis conditions. More direct testing showed that hypnosis reduced the strength of the association of pain modulation and brain activity changes at BA3. sLORETA in HHs revealed, for the N140 wave, that during hypnotic hyperalgesia, there was an increased activity within medial, supramarginal and superior frontal gyri, and cingulated gyrus (BA32), while for the P200 wave, activity was increased in the superior (BA22), middle (BA37), inferior temporal (BA19) gyri and superior parietal lobule (BA7). Hypnotic hypoalgesia in HHs, for N140 wave, showed reduced activity within medial and superior frontal gyri (BA9,8), paraippocampal gyrus (BA34), and postcentral gyrus (BA1), while for the P200, activity was reduced within middle and superior frontal gyri (BA9 and BA10), anterior cingulate (BA33), cuneus (BA19) and sub-lobar insula (BA13). These findings demonstrate that hypnotic suggestions can exert a top-down modulatory effect on attention/preconscious brain processes involved in pain perception. Public Library of Science 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4452240/ /pubmed/26030417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128474 Text en © 2015 De Pascalis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Pascalis, Vilfredo
Varriale, Vincenzo
Cacace, Immacolata
Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title_full Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title_fullStr Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title_full_unstemmed Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title_short Pain Modulation in Waking and Hypnosis in Women: Event-Related Potentials and Sources of Cortical Activity
title_sort pain modulation in waking and hypnosis in women: event-related potentials and sources of cortical activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128474
work_keys_str_mv AT depascalisvilfredo painmodulationinwakingandhypnosisinwomeneventrelatedpotentialsandsourcesofcorticalactivity
AT varrialevincenzo painmodulationinwakingandhypnosisinwomeneventrelatedpotentialsandsourcesofcorticalactivity
AT cacaceimmacolata painmodulationinwakingandhypnosisinwomeneventrelatedpotentialsandsourcesofcorticalactivity