Cargando…

Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration

This study assessed the osseointegrative effects of atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) surface treatment for implants in a canine model. Control surfaces were untreated textured titanium (Ti) and calcium phosphate (CaP). Experimental surfaces were their 80-second air-based APP-treated counterparts. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danna, Natalie R., Beutel, Bryan G., Tovar, Nick, Witek, Lukasz, Marin, Charles, Bonfante, Estevam A., Granato, Rodrigo, Suzuki, Marcelo, Coelho, Paulo G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26090443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/761718
_version_ 1782374279011106816
author Danna, Natalie R.
Beutel, Bryan G.
Tovar, Nick
Witek, Lukasz
Marin, Charles
Bonfante, Estevam A.
Granato, Rodrigo
Suzuki, Marcelo
Coelho, Paulo G.
author_facet Danna, Natalie R.
Beutel, Bryan G.
Tovar, Nick
Witek, Lukasz
Marin, Charles
Bonfante, Estevam A.
Granato, Rodrigo
Suzuki, Marcelo
Coelho, Paulo G.
author_sort Danna, Natalie R.
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the osseointegrative effects of atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) surface treatment for implants in a canine model. Control surfaces were untreated textured titanium (Ti) and calcium phosphate (CaP). Experimental surfaces were their 80-second air-based APP-treated counterparts. Physicochemical characterization was performed to assess topography, surface energy, and chemical composition. One implant from each control and experimental group (four in total) was placed in one radius of each of the seven male beagles for three weeks, and one implant from each group was placed in the contralateral radius for six weeks. After sacrifice, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were assessed. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed decreased surface levels of carbon and increased Ti and oxygen, and calcium and oxygen, posttreatment for Ti and CaP surfaces, respectively. There was a significant (P < 0.001) increase in BIC for APP-treated textured Ti surfaces at six weeks but not at three weeks or for CaP surfaces. There were no significant (P = 0.57) differences for BAFO between treated and untreated surfaces for either material at either time point. This suggests that air-based APP surface treatment may improve osseointegration of textured Ti surfaces but not CaP surfaces. Studies optimizing APP parameters and applications are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4452268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44522682015-06-18 Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration Danna, Natalie R. Beutel, Bryan G. Tovar, Nick Witek, Lukasz Marin, Charles Bonfante, Estevam A. Granato, Rodrigo Suzuki, Marcelo Coelho, Paulo G. Biomed Res Int Research Article This study assessed the osseointegrative effects of atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) surface treatment for implants in a canine model. Control surfaces were untreated textured titanium (Ti) and calcium phosphate (CaP). Experimental surfaces were their 80-second air-based APP-treated counterparts. Physicochemical characterization was performed to assess topography, surface energy, and chemical composition. One implant from each control and experimental group (four in total) was placed in one radius of each of the seven male beagles for three weeks, and one implant from each group was placed in the contralateral radius for six weeks. After sacrifice, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were assessed. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed decreased surface levels of carbon and increased Ti and oxygen, and calcium and oxygen, posttreatment for Ti and CaP surfaces, respectively. There was a significant (P < 0.001) increase in BIC for APP-treated textured Ti surfaces at six weeks but not at three weeks or for CaP surfaces. There were no significant (P = 0.57) differences for BAFO between treated and untreated surfaces for either material at either time point. This suggests that air-based APP surface treatment may improve osseointegration of textured Ti surfaces but not CaP surfaces. Studies optimizing APP parameters and applications are warranted. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4452268/ /pubmed/26090443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/761718 Text en Copyright © 2015 Natalie R. Danna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Danna, Natalie R.
Beutel, Bryan G.
Tovar, Nick
Witek, Lukasz
Marin, Charles
Bonfante, Estevam A.
Granato, Rodrigo
Suzuki, Marcelo
Coelho, Paulo G.
Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title_full Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title_fullStr Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title_short Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration
title_sort assessment of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment for implant osseointegration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26090443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/761718
work_keys_str_mv AT dannanatalier assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT beutelbryang assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT tovarnick assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT witeklukasz assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT marincharles assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT bonfanteestevama assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT granatorodrigo assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT suzukimarcelo assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration
AT coelhopaulog assessmentofatmosphericpressureplasmatreatmentforimplantosseointegration